I gotta say, Thiebaud's work is straight fire 
! I mean, have you seen that "Candy Counter" painting? It's like a trip to the past, but at the same time, it's so modern and cool. The way he uses color and shape to create this sense of excitement... it's just genius 
. And yeah, his prints from the 60s are super underrated too - they're like a window into another world, you know? But what I love about Thiebaud is that he's not just some decorative artist; he's got depth and complexity to his work. He's all about exploring ideas and meanings, which makes it so appealing for art lovers who want more than just pretty pictures 
.
! I mean, have you seen that "Candy Counter" painting? It's like a trip to the past, but at the same time, it's so modern and cool. The way he uses color and shape to create this sense of excitement... it's just genius . And yeah, his prints from the 60s are super underrated too - they're like a window into another world, you know? But what I love about Thiebaud is that he's not just some decorative artist; he's got depth and complexity to his work. He's all about exploring ideas and meanings, which makes it so appealing for art lovers who want more than just pretty pictures .
. I think it's so cool how he uses bright colors and geometric shapes to make those paintings pop! It's like a party on your wall, you know? But what really gets me is how his work can be both decorative and intellectual at the same time. Like, yeah, the colors are fun and all, but then you start thinking about what it means, and it's like... whoa. I've always loved how he uses everyday objects like candy and sweets as subjects in his art too - it's like he's saying, "Hey, life is sweet, let's make a painting about it!" 
. I mean, have you seen his candy paintings? They're like something out of a dream... or a fever dream 
. The way he uses color and shape to create visual excitement is just genius.
? I mean, sure, Thiebaud's work has intellectual content too, but can't we just enjoy it without overthinking every little detail?
they're like a party on canvas! but what i'm wondering is how much of the artwork is just aesthetically pleasing vs actually symbolic or meaningful 
is it like, surface level or does he put thought into each piece? 
also, why do you think he chose everyday objects as subjects in his art? like candy and desserts... is there something about them that's so special or appealing to him? 