Australia is set to push billions of dollars' worth of arms at a major defence exhibition in Dubai, sparking fresh calls for scrutiny over the country's military exports to the United Arab Emirates.
The UAE has emerged as Australia's largest market for defence sales, with almost $300 million worth of equipment shipped there over the past five years. But human rights groups and politicians are growing increasingly concerned about the potential use of these arms in conflict zones like Sudan, where thousands have been killed and hundreds of thousands displaced.
Amid mounting evidence that the UAE is arming a paramilitary force accused of atrocities in Darfur, campaigners are urging Australia to reconsider its lucrative defence ties with the country. Critics say it's impossible to verify whether Australian-made weapons have not been used in Sudan, despite assurances from Canberra.
A major defence exhibition in Dubai, where more than 35 Australian companies will be represented, is expected to fuel debate over the ethics of arms sales to countries accused of violating human rights and war crimes.
Critics argue that Australia's opaque arms export regime lacks accountability, leaving it unclear how and where its military equipment ends up. A senior lecturer in international law told The Guardian: "It may be an increasingly lucrative business for Australian companies, but we should ask ourselves if it is really through the manufacturing of weapons that we want to increase our wealth."
The concerns come as Australia's government continues to defend its defence ties with the UAE, saying they are in line with international obligations and contribute to regional stability. However, campaigners argue that the lack of transparency over arms exports means Australians cannot be confident that their military equipment is not being used to fuel human rights abuses.
The Australian government has condemned the atrocities in Sudan and called for a three-month "humanitarian truce". But critics say more needs to be done to address concerns over its defence ties with countries accused of war crimes.
The UAE has emerged as Australia's largest market for defence sales, with almost $300 million worth of equipment shipped there over the past five years. But human rights groups and politicians are growing increasingly concerned about the potential use of these arms in conflict zones like Sudan, where thousands have been killed and hundreds of thousands displaced.
Amid mounting evidence that the UAE is arming a paramilitary force accused of atrocities in Darfur, campaigners are urging Australia to reconsider its lucrative defence ties with the country. Critics say it's impossible to verify whether Australian-made weapons have not been used in Sudan, despite assurances from Canberra.
A major defence exhibition in Dubai, where more than 35 Australian companies will be represented, is expected to fuel debate over the ethics of arms sales to countries accused of violating human rights and war crimes.
Critics argue that Australia's opaque arms export regime lacks accountability, leaving it unclear how and where its military equipment ends up. A senior lecturer in international law told The Guardian: "It may be an increasingly lucrative business for Australian companies, but we should ask ourselves if it is really through the manufacturing of weapons that we want to increase our wealth."
The concerns come as Australia's government continues to defend its defence ties with the UAE, saying they are in line with international obligations and contribute to regional stability. However, campaigners argue that the lack of transparency over arms exports means Australians cannot be confident that their military equipment is not being used to fuel human rights abuses.
The Australian government has condemned the atrocities in Sudan and called for a three-month "humanitarian truce". But critics say more needs to be done to address concerns over its defence ties with countries accused of war crimes.