The US tech industry is once again kowtowing to President Donald Trump, the man who has been a thorn in its side for years. One year after his inauguration, the biggest players in Silicon Valley are still lavishing praise on him and showering him with cash.
Trump's administration has signed off on an executive order that prohibits states from passing laws regulating AI, handing the industry a significant victory. The move has been welcomed by the tech giants, who have donated millions of dollars to Trump's campaign and are now reaping the rewards of their efforts.
But what's driving this Faustian bargain? Trump is worried about the cost of running datacenters, which he claims could be a major liability for his party in the November election. In response, he has ordered the largest power grid operator to hold an emergency reliability power auction by September. This move could force tech giants to pay for the construction of new power plants and pay more for electricity.
It's a classic case of Trump trying to balance his desire for deregulation with the need to placate his base. But the problem is that the benefits of AI are increasingly concentrated in areas where renewable energy is still relatively cheap, like the Middle East and India.
European governments are facing similar challenges, as datacenters continue to gobble up electricity. In Germany, Chancellor Friedrich Merz has agreed to subsidize heavy industrial use of electricity until 2028, but this may not be enough to satisfy the growing demand for power from tech giants.
Meanwhile, Australia's social media ban for under-16s is having unintended consequences. Despite millions of accounts being deleted or restricted in the first days after the ban came into effect, new accounts are still being created and the age-verification tools have proven to be laughably easy to bypass.
As the US tech industry continues to bend the knee to Trump's demands, it's clear that this is a lose-lose situation for everyone involved. The industry gets more regulatory relief, but at what cost to its reputation and its ability to shape public policy? The answer, unfortunately, is that we don't yet know. But one thing is certain: the consequences of this Faustian bargain will be felt for years to come.
Trump's administration has signed off on an executive order that prohibits states from passing laws regulating AI, handing the industry a significant victory. The move has been welcomed by the tech giants, who have donated millions of dollars to Trump's campaign and are now reaping the rewards of their efforts.
But what's driving this Faustian bargain? Trump is worried about the cost of running datacenters, which he claims could be a major liability for his party in the November election. In response, he has ordered the largest power grid operator to hold an emergency reliability power auction by September. This move could force tech giants to pay for the construction of new power plants and pay more for electricity.
It's a classic case of Trump trying to balance his desire for deregulation with the need to placate his base. But the problem is that the benefits of AI are increasingly concentrated in areas where renewable energy is still relatively cheap, like the Middle East and India.
European governments are facing similar challenges, as datacenters continue to gobble up electricity. In Germany, Chancellor Friedrich Merz has agreed to subsidize heavy industrial use of electricity until 2028, but this may not be enough to satisfy the growing demand for power from tech giants.
Meanwhile, Australia's social media ban for under-16s is having unintended consequences. Despite millions of accounts being deleted or restricted in the first days after the ban came into effect, new accounts are still being created and the age-verification tools have proven to be laughably easy to bypass.
As the US tech industry continues to bend the knee to Trump's demands, it's clear that this is a lose-lose situation for everyone involved. The industry gets more regulatory relief, but at what cost to its reputation and its ability to shape public policy? The answer, unfortunately, is that we don't yet know. But one thing is certain: the consequences of this Faustian bargain will be felt for years to come.