President Donald Trump's Threat to Cut Off Federal Funds: A Constitutional Conundrum
Hours before polls closed in New York City's mayoral race, President Trump backed Andrew Cuomo and warned Mamdani of potential cuts if he wins. If Mamdani takes office, it is likely that federal funding will dry up for the city due to Trump's threat.
Trump had previously hinted at this during his 60 Minutes interview on CBS News, calling Mamdani a "communist" and stating that sending money to New York would be hard if he wins. However, experts argue that such actions are unconstitutional.
Under Article I of Section 8 of the US Constitution, Congress has the authority to decide how federal funds are allocated to states, not the president. Trump's threat to withhold funding is an example of impoundment on his part, which would be considered an unconstitutional act if he does not follow through with congressional decisions made by law.
The Impoundment Control Act allows the president to withhold funds for 45 days, but Congress must approve such a decision. Given the current party balance in Congress, it is unlikely that Trump's actions will be approved by both parties.
Trump's threat also raises questions about Cuomo's eligibility for funding. As an independent candidate, Cuomo initially lost the Democratic primary to Mamdani and has a history of scandals, including allegations of sexual harassment. The New York City Campaign Finance Board found his campaign had not provided digital donation records, resulting in nearly $3m worth of public funds being denied.
New York City's dependence on federal funding is significant, with a report showing that the city will require $7.4bn in federal funding for the fiscal year 2026. However, Trump's actions are likely to have a devastating impact on the city's budget, with potential cuts estimated at up to $400m in the fiscal year 2025.
In conclusion, while Trump's threat to cut off federal funds may seem like an empty boast given his own history of controversy, it is essential to examine the constitutional implications of such actions. If Mamdani takes office and federal funding dries up, New York City will likely face severe economic and social consequences.
Hours before polls closed in New York City's mayoral race, President Trump backed Andrew Cuomo and warned Mamdani of potential cuts if he wins. If Mamdani takes office, it is likely that federal funding will dry up for the city due to Trump's threat.
Trump had previously hinted at this during his 60 Minutes interview on CBS News, calling Mamdani a "communist" and stating that sending money to New York would be hard if he wins. However, experts argue that such actions are unconstitutional.
Under Article I of Section 8 of the US Constitution, Congress has the authority to decide how federal funds are allocated to states, not the president. Trump's threat to withhold funding is an example of impoundment on his part, which would be considered an unconstitutional act if he does not follow through with congressional decisions made by law.
The Impoundment Control Act allows the president to withhold funds for 45 days, but Congress must approve such a decision. Given the current party balance in Congress, it is unlikely that Trump's actions will be approved by both parties.
Trump's threat also raises questions about Cuomo's eligibility for funding. As an independent candidate, Cuomo initially lost the Democratic primary to Mamdani and has a history of scandals, including allegations of sexual harassment. The New York City Campaign Finance Board found his campaign had not provided digital donation records, resulting in nearly $3m worth of public funds being denied.
New York City's dependence on federal funding is significant, with a report showing that the city will require $7.4bn in federal funding for the fiscal year 2026. However, Trump's actions are likely to have a devastating impact on the city's budget, with potential cuts estimated at up to $400m in the fiscal year 2025.
In conclusion, while Trump's threat to cut off federal funds may seem like an empty boast given his own history of controversy, it is essential to examine the constitutional implications of such actions. If Mamdani takes office and federal funding dries up, New York City will likely face severe economic and social consequences.