Ammon Bundy, a prominent figure in the right-wing movement, has publicly distanced himself from the administration's stance on immigration enforcement by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The rancher and militia member, known for his involvement in armed standoffs with the federal government, recently expressed discomfort with the actions of ICE, calling it a "moral failure" that disregards the rights of immigrants.
Bundy's views are not unique to the Republican Party or the MAGA movement. Last year, he published an essay highlighting the biblical case for protecting all individuals who enter the United States, arguing that the right to move and seek peace is a fundamental human right, not a privilege granted by governments.
In his recent interview with The Atlantic, Bundy stated that labeling immigrants as "criminals" for lacking official permission is "to forget the moral law of God, the historical truth of our own founding, and the Constitutional ideals that continue to define justice." This stance places him at odds with many in his own community, including some who joined the armed standoffs led by Bundy and his father.
When confronted with the support for ICE operations from fellow militia members, Bundy expressed confusion and concern. He described their views as "scary" and said he couldn't understand how they think. This sentiment suggests that Bundy's shift away from supporting ICE is not just a matter of changing one's perspective but also a deep-seated discomfort with certain ideologies within his own community.
Bundy's stance on immigration enforcement has significant implications for the future of the right-wing movement, which has long been characterized by its support for strict border control and deportation policies. As Bundy breaks with this stance, it raises questions about the internal dynamics of the movement and whether other prominent figures will follow suit.
Bundy's views are not unique to the Republican Party or the MAGA movement. Last year, he published an essay highlighting the biblical case for protecting all individuals who enter the United States, arguing that the right to move and seek peace is a fundamental human right, not a privilege granted by governments.
In his recent interview with The Atlantic, Bundy stated that labeling immigrants as "criminals" for lacking official permission is "to forget the moral law of God, the historical truth of our own founding, and the Constitutional ideals that continue to define justice." This stance places him at odds with many in his own community, including some who joined the armed standoffs led by Bundy and his father.
When confronted with the support for ICE operations from fellow militia members, Bundy expressed confusion and concern. He described their views as "scary" and said he couldn't understand how they think. This sentiment suggests that Bundy's shift away from supporting ICE is not just a matter of changing one's perspective but also a deep-seated discomfort with certain ideologies within his own community.
Bundy's stance on immigration enforcement has significant implications for the future of the right-wing movement, which has long been characterized by its support for strict border control and deportation policies. As Bundy breaks with this stance, it raises questions about the internal dynamics of the movement and whether other prominent figures will follow suit.
It sounds like a recipe for disaster to me.
. I mean, can you blame him? The more I think about it, the more I realize how messed up our border policies are 
. Bundy's right, it is a moral failure to treat people as if they're less than human just because of their immigration status.
. Will other militia members follow suit? Or will Bundy be shunned by his own community? I think this could be a major turning point for the right-wing movement and it's gonna be interesting to watch unfold 
.
. I've always thought of Bundy as a bit of an outlier in the right-wing crowd, but at the same time, his views are pretty standard for anyone who cares about human rights and whatnot. I mean, can't we all agree that people have the right to move around freely? 
.
". It's hard to say for sure, but either way, it's interesting to see someone from within the right-wing crowd start to question some of their core beliefs. Maybe this is the spark that's gonna get some real change happening 
?
. I mean, we've got a guy like Ammon Bundy, who's been all about being tough on immigration, suddenly saying that labeling immigrants as "criminals" is morally wrong? It's like he's waking up to reality or something 
. Either way, it's good to see someone like him having a change of heart, even if it is about time 
.
. And hey, maybe this is an opportunity for some folks to re-examine their views and consider the human side of things 
. Fingers crossed, right? 
. Bundy's right, we can't just lock up people who are trying to make a better life for themselves. The thought of labeling them as "criminals" is messed up 
. Like, how can they be so one-dimensional? Bundys shifting stance shows there's more to these issues than just party loyalty 
. Maybe it's time for a new kind of leader to step forward and talk about some real moral principles 
.
now we're like "hold my beer" and swipe left 
Like, he used to be all about armed standoffs with the feds, but now he's like "Hey, let's be kind to these people" 
Either way, kudos to Bundy for speaking out against ICE and advocating for human rights. It's about time someone in the right-wing movement had some empathy