Manchester United is set to appoint Michael Carrick as its interim head coach, a move that many will be hoping will finally bring some much-needed success to the club. However, there are those who believe that for this to happen, Carrick needs to shake off his rigid tactics and adopt a more fluid approach.
Carrick's resistance to change has been highlighted in his managerial career thus far. At Middlesbrough, despite an impressive start under him, the team eventually fell into a pattern of playing with too much possession-heavy passing game. This lack of adaptability ultimately led to his sacking by the club last season.
Although injuries played a significant role in destabilizing Boro's defensive and goalkeeping departments, there were times when it was felt that Carrick didn't make the most of his resources. His team often struggled against teams who adopted a different approach to counter their possession-based game. Sunderland manager Régis Le Bris noted after beating Boro 1-0 how they had decided to close down the central corridor in which Boro liked to keep possession, effectively neutralizing them.
Despite these criticisms, Carrick is widely regarded as a man of integrity and leadership who has earned the loyalty of his players and staff. His commitment to community and charity work was seen as an admirable quality. However, this sometimes made him appear over-cautious with journalists, which could make it difficult for supporters to appreciate his coaching style.
Boro's manager, Alex Neil, made some telling comments after losing a match against Millwall where he questioned the value of "philosophy" in football management and instead emphasized the importance of adapting to different situations. This sentiment is shared by Preston's manager Paul Heckingbottom who felt that Boro had a good side but that Carrick's approach rarely changed.
In all fairness, Carrick did have his chance at United as caretaker manager when Mourinho left the club, where he showed some promise before leaving. If he is to succeed in Manchester, it will be crucial for him to learn from these experiences and adopt more flexibility in his tactics.
Carrick's resistance to change has been highlighted in his managerial career thus far. At Middlesbrough, despite an impressive start under him, the team eventually fell into a pattern of playing with too much possession-heavy passing game. This lack of adaptability ultimately led to his sacking by the club last season.
Although injuries played a significant role in destabilizing Boro's defensive and goalkeeping departments, there were times when it was felt that Carrick didn't make the most of his resources. His team often struggled against teams who adopted a different approach to counter their possession-based game. Sunderland manager Régis Le Bris noted after beating Boro 1-0 how they had decided to close down the central corridor in which Boro liked to keep possession, effectively neutralizing them.
Despite these criticisms, Carrick is widely regarded as a man of integrity and leadership who has earned the loyalty of his players and staff. His commitment to community and charity work was seen as an admirable quality. However, this sometimes made him appear over-cautious with journalists, which could make it difficult for supporters to appreciate his coaching style.
Boro's manager, Alex Neil, made some telling comments after losing a match against Millwall where he questioned the value of "philosophy" in football management and instead emphasized the importance of adapting to different situations. This sentiment is shared by Preston's manager Paul Heckingbottom who felt that Boro had a good side but that Carrick's approach rarely changed.
In all fairness, Carrick did have his chance at United as caretaker manager when Mourinho left the club, where he showed some promise before leaving. If he is to succeed in Manchester, it will be crucial for him to learn from these experiences and adopt more flexibility in his tactics.