The CDC vaccine panel has once again revealed its ineptitude, this time delaying a vote on whether to recommend hepatitis B vaccinations for newborns. The decision was made after the panel realized it didn't understand the topic or what it was voting on. This is not the first time the panel has bungled a key issue - in September, it tried to make a similar recommendation but ultimately threw its hands up and decided to delay the vote.
The latest debacle began with confusion over the wording of a new recommendation, which had been altered three times in just 72 hours. The presentations given by anti-vaccine activists during the meeting were particularly woeful, featuring false claims, conspiracy theories, and cherry-picked studies that offered no credible evidence. One presenter, Cynthia Nevison, claimed that the hepatitis B vaccine did not offer lifelong protection, despite her own study being misrepresented to suggest the opposite.
Other panel members made similar blunders, with one anti-vaccine activist suggesting that delayed vaccination could lead to more infections in babies - a claim that was quickly debunked by a pediatrician who had been involved in the relevant research. The meeting descended into chaos, with some panel members attacking the quality of safety data in past hepatitis B studies and making absurd claims about vaccine side effects.
The latest delay has sent shockwaves through the medical community, which is watching with growing alarm as Kennedy's allies continue to push an anti-vaccine agenda that prioritizes ideology over evidence. The decision not to recommend a birth dose of the hepatitis B vaccine could have serious consequences for public health, particularly in communities where access to vaccines is already limited.
As Jason Goldman, a physician and ACIP liaison, pointed out during the meeting, "Once again, this committee fails to use the evidence to recommend framework... This meeting is completely inappropriate... The best thing you can do is adjourn the meeting and discuss vaccine issues that actually need to be taken up." It remains to be seen whether the panel will learn from its mistakes and prioritize evidence-based decision-making in the future.
The latest debacle began with confusion over the wording of a new recommendation, which had been altered three times in just 72 hours. The presentations given by anti-vaccine activists during the meeting were particularly woeful, featuring false claims, conspiracy theories, and cherry-picked studies that offered no credible evidence. One presenter, Cynthia Nevison, claimed that the hepatitis B vaccine did not offer lifelong protection, despite her own study being misrepresented to suggest the opposite.
Other panel members made similar blunders, with one anti-vaccine activist suggesting that delayed vaccination could lead to more infections in babies - a claim that was quickly debunked by a pediatrician who had been involved in the relevant research. The meeting descended into chaos, with some panel members attacking the quality of safety data in past hepatitis B studies and making absurd claims about vaccine side effects.
The latest delay has sent shockwaves through the medical community, which is watching with growing alarm as Kennedy's allies continue to push an anti-vaccine agenda that prioritizes ideology over evidence. The decision not to recommend a birth dose of the hepatitis B vaccine could have serious consequences for public health, particularly in communities where access to vaccines is already limited.
As Jason Goldman, a physician and ACIP liaison, pointed out during the meeting, "Once again, this committee fails to use the evidence to recommend framework... This meeting is completely inappropriate... The best thing you can do is adjourn the meeting and discuss vaccine issues that actually need to be taken up." It remains to be seen whether the panel will learn from its mistakes and prioritize evidence-based decision-making in the future.