ChatGPT came up with a 'Game of Thrones' sequel idea. Now, a judge is letting George RR Martin sue for copyright infringement.

C

CrimsonSpark

A federal judge in Manhattan has given the green light to a class-action lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging that the artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT infringed on copyrights belonging to several authors. The claim centers around ChatGPT's response to a prompt from one of the authors' lawyers, which included an original idea for a book in George R.R. Martin's "A Song of Ice and Fire" series.

ChatGPT responded with detailed plot ideas that closely resembled concepts in George R.R. Martin's existing works, raising copyright infringement claims against both OpenAI and Microsoft.

Judge Sidney Stein ruled that ChatGPT's response was substantially similar to the works of the authors, paving the way for the class-action lawsuit to move forward.

This ruling comes after a federal judge in San Francisco previously deemed Anthropic's use of copyrighted books to train its large language models protected by fair use.

In this case, representatives for OpenAI and Microsoft have not responded to requests for comment.

The decision highlights the growing complexity of copyright disputes involving AI-generated content.
 
Ugh, this is gonna be a long battle 🤯. I mean, who thought it was a good idea to train an AI chatbot on copyrighted books? It's like they're just waiting for someone to sue them into oblivion 😒. And now that the lawsuit is moving forward, I'm sure we'll see a whole bunch of lawyers lining up to cash in 🤑. I don't get why these authors are so upset - it's not like ChatGPT was trying to steal their ideas or something (although, let's be real, it kinda was). And what's the point of all this? Is it just about making a quick buck off some AI-generated content? 🤷‍♂️
 
🤯 OMG you guys! Can't even believe what's happening here! So like, ChatGPT just straight up copied an idea from George R.R. Martin's book series and no one is touching it? 🙄 Not cool, not cool at all! I mean, I get that AI is getting better and all, but come on! We need to set some boundaries here.

And now a class-action lawsuit is gonna happen because of this?! 🤯 Like, what's next? The AI gods just gonna keep making more copies without permission? This ruling is giving me major déjà vu vibes from the whole YouTube vs. Veritasium thing back in 2018... remember that? 😂

I'm low-key kinda stoked to see these giants get taken down a peg though 🤑. Like, who's next? Will Google get sued for using copyrighted pics on their search results?! 🤔 The drama is real, folks! 💥
 
This ruling is super interesting 🤔. So basically, a machine like ChatGPT can come up with ideas that are super similar to someone else's work without even knowing it? That raises some major red flags for creators and authors out there. I mean, if you're writing a book in the George R.R. Martin series, wouldn't you want your own unique spin on things? 📚

And now we have a lawsuit saying that AI chatbots like ChatGPT can just take someone's idea without permission? That's a big deal. I'm not sure what the rules are here or how this will all play out, but it seems to me that there needs to be some clear guidelines for creators on how to protect their work in this new digital landscape 🤖.

The fact that a judge had to weigh in on whether Anthropic's use of copyrighted books was fair use or not is also pretty revealing. It shows just how nuanced and tricky these issues can get. I'm keeping an eye on this one, because it's gonna be interesting to see how it all shakes out 📊
 
🤔 This ruling is super interesting, right? I mean, we've heard about how AI can generate some crazy realistic stuff, but it's wild that someone took this all the way to court. The fact that ChatGPT came up with ideas that closely resembled existing works from George R.R. Martin's series is just mind-blowing. It raises so many questions about authorship and ownership in the digital age. I think it'll be fascinating to see how this plays out in terms of what constitutes fair use or copyright infringement. The fact that Anthropic got a different ruling on their use of copyrighted books makes me wonder if there's a gray area here where AI-generated content can get away with certain uses without getting sued. 📚💡
 
I don't get why people are making a big deal about ChatGPT copying some book ideas from George R.R. Martin's books 🤔. I mean, if it can come up with plot ideas that sound like his existing works, isn't that just a testament to the AI being smart? 😊 It's not like OpenAI and Microsoft are profiting off someone else's work without permission - they're more or less creating new content based on existing concepts.

And let's be real, what's the point of having copyright laws if some AI can just copy stuff that's already been written? 🤷‍♂️ It's not like it's hurting anyone to have some AI-generated ideas floating around. It's a free market, right? If people want to use ChatGPT's ideas, they should be able to pay for them or give credit where credit is due (which in this case would be Martin himself). 🤑
 
I think it's super clear that AI chatbots are just a bunch of copycats... I mean, what's the point of even having copyrights anymore? It's like, the internet is just one big library now and whoever comes up with an idea first gets to claim ownership of all the copies that come after. And let's be real, ChatGPT's creators probably didn't even write those ideas down themselves... they just grabbed them from somewhere online and regurgitated them onto the page. It's basically like having a robot that can Google for you or something! 🤖😂
 
omg, can u imagine having ur genius ideas stolen 🤯📚 i mean, the fact that ChatGPT came up with similar plot ideas for George R.R. Martin's books is wild. it raises so many questions about creativity and ownership in this new era of AI-generated content 🤔 i think it's cool that there's a class-action lawsuit going on to protect authors' rights, but at the same time, AI is supposed to be all about innovation and progress... what's the balance here? 🤷‍♀️ do we need more rules or just more open discussion about how to navigate this crazy world? 💡
 
🤔 I think it's crazy that a chatbot can come up with ideas that are super similar to books already out there. I mean, we're talking about George R.R. Martin's "A Song of Ice and Fire" series here - that's like the holy grail for fantasy book fans. If ChatGPT is just spewing off ideas it's seen before without giving credit, then that's a problem.

The idea of fair use in AI training is already a gray area, but this takes it to another level. I'm curious to see how this case plays out and what the outcome will be. Will OpenAI and Microsoft get hit with some major fines? Maybe they'll just take the loss as a warning to start being more careful about their AI development.

It's also worth thinking about where this technology is headed - are we gonna have AI-generated content that's indistinguishable from the real deal? And what does that mean for creators who put their blood, sweat, and tears into crafting their work? The implications of this ruling are huge, and I'm sure we'll be hearing a lot more about it in the coming weeks and months. 🤖💡
 
🤖 The AI chatbot craze is getting all too real! I'm surprised OpenAI and Microsoft are letting this one slide though - I mean, we've seen Taylor Swift take down copyright trolls over a few lyrics 😂. This ruling is a big deal, but also kinda like the plot twist in Game of Thrones... you never see it coming (pun intended). Seriously though, with AI-generated content becoming more prevalent, we need to figure out some solid guidelines on what constitutes fair use and when someone's just being a total troll 🙄. This case might just be the spark that sets off a whole new wave of copyright disputes in the AI world...
 
I'm so confused about this whole ChatGPT thing 🤔. Apparently it's like a super smart computer program that can write book ideas or something, but I don't get how that's allowed to steal other people's work. It sounds like the authors are upset because someone (or something?) came up with similar ideas and didn't ask permission. 🤷‍♂️

So if ChatGPT is making up all these plot twists and stuff on its own, then why can it just use them without getting in trouble? I thought that was how copyrights were supposed to work... like, you write something and it's yours forever. 📚 But now it sounds like AI programs are kind of a wild card. 🤯
 
Man... can you believe it? ChatGPT just got slammed with a copyright lawsuit 🤯! I mean, I get why the authors are mad - original ideas in George R.R. Martin's series are like gold 💃. But at the same time, can we really say that OpenAI and Microsoft intentionally copied from them? 🤔 It seems like AI is just really good at mimicking what it's been trained on... kinda like how I'm good at nostalgic gaming reviews 😄.

But seriously, this raises some big questions about ownership and creativity in the digital age. Are we gonna have to pay royalties for every idea that AI comes up with? 🤑 It feels like we're just scratching the surface of what's possible (and what's copyrightable) here... I'm both excited and terrified at the same time 😅.

One thing's for sure, though - this is a wild ride. Can't wait to see how it all plays out! 🎥
 
Ugh, this is gonna be a whole mess 🤯... so now we're saying that AI chatbots like ChatGPT are allowed to just swipe original ideas from authors and pass 'em off as their own? That's some messed up stuff, if you ask me... I mean, what's the point of even having copyright laws if AI is just gonna use them for its own gain? 🤑 And don't even get me started on Microsoft and OpenAI, they're probably just sitting back smiling while their AI does all the work and makes a killing in the process... It's like, what's fair about using someone else's work without permission? 😒
 
I'm so confused about this whole thing... Like I get that some authors are upset that ChatGPT is using their ideas without permission, but isn't it just a big computer program trying to generate responses? 🤖 It's not like the dude who created ChatGPT was sitting at his desk thinking "Hey, I'm gonna use George R.R. Martin's ideas for my chatbot"...

And what about fair use, right? If Anthropic can train its models on copyrighted books without getting in trouble, shouldn't OpenAI and Microsoft be able to do the same? 🤔 It feels like we're just starting to figure out how to deal with all this AI stuff and copyright law is still kinda... fuzzy. 😅
 
🤔 This whole AI thing is getting crazy fast! I mean, on one hand, it's amazing what these chatbots can come up with, but on the other hand, it's like they're borrowing ideas left and right without even giving credit 🙄. I've been seeing more and more cases like this where some artist or author gets their work used in a way that feels like ripping off. It's not just the original creators who are affected, either - readers get confused when they see these similarities between what's new and what's old.

I'm curious to see how this whole thing plays out, especially since we've had some protection under fair use with Anthropic's models. Maybe it's time for a new set of guidelines or rules that make sense for the AI age? I wish I had more insight into all this tech stuff... but one thing's for sure: we need to figure out how to respect each other's work in this digital age 💻
 
I'm low-key shook by this whole thing 🤯. I mean, can you imagine if your original ideas got stolen in a game of 'copy-paste' by some AI? It's like, no one's safe from copyright infringement anymore 😂. And what really gets me is that ChatGPT just straight-up lifted the plot ideas from George R.R. Martin's books. I mean, isn't that, like, a huge deal? 🤔

I guess what's interesting here is how the courts are handling AI-generated content and copyright laws. Like, is it fair use or not? 🤷‍♀️ And if ChatGPT can just pull stuff from existing works without permission, where does that leave all the authors out there who pour their hearts into their writing?

For real though, this whole thing makes me wanna re-read some George R.R. Martin books just to make sure I'm not stealing any plot ideas for my own writing 📚💡.
 
The recent ruling on ChatGPT's alleged copyright infringement is a fascinating case study in the evolving landscape of intellectual property law 🤔. It's intriguing to consider how an AI chatbot can inadvertently (or perhaps intentionally?) draw upon existing works, leading to questions about authorship and ownership in the digital age 💡. The fact that Judge Stein has deemed ChatGPT's response substantially similar to the authors' works raises important concerns about the boundaries of fair use and the potential for AI-generated content to cannibalize existing creative works 📚. It'll be interesting to see how this case unfolds and whether it sets a precedent for future copyright disputes involving AI-powered tools 💻.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top