Chicago Police Officer's Future Hangs in Balance Amid Firing Charges Over Alleged Beating of Teenager
Officer Jeffery Shafer, 35, is facing potential dismissal from the Chicago Police Department after a disciplinary hearing was convened against him. The charges stem from an alleged beating he inflicted on a 17-year-old boy during a high-speed chase in January 2021.
According to police, Shafer and his partner, Victor Guebara, were patrolling when they spotted the teenager driving a stolen car. A pursuit ensued, with the vehicle eventually crashing into a brick garage. In what prosecutors describe as an "unprovoked" attack, Shafer allegedly punched the teen four times in the head while he was on the ground.
The charges against Shafer are serious, and if found guilty of misconduct, could result in termination from the department. However, it's worth noting that his partner, Guebara, has not faced similar disciplinary action, despite also being involved in the incident.
Shafer had previously been charged criminally with the teen but saw those charges dropped earlier this year due to lack of cooperation by the alleged victim. It's unclear what role the prosecution's decision will have on Shafer's disciplinary hearing.
The case against Shafer has raised questions about police accountability and transparency. The fact that his attorney did not immediately respond to a request for comment may suggest that Shafer is facing intense scrutiny over his actions during the incident.
This is not the first time Shafer has been embroiled in controversy. He has faced multiple disciplinary charges, including allegations of excessive force and using his gun improperly. In 2019, he was involved in a high-profile lawsuit alleging that he and other officers engaged in an unlawful search warrant raid on an apartment, where no contraband was found.
The Chicago Police Department has been criticized for its handling of Shafer's disciplinary hearing, with some arguing that the case should be heard by an independent arbitrator rather than the police board. However, this decision is now set to be reviewed by the state Supreme Court.
Officer Jeffery Shafer, 35, is facing potential dismissal from the Chicago Police Department after a disciplinary hearing was convened against him. The charges stem from an alleged beating he inflicted on a 17-year-old boy during a high-speed chase in January 2021.
According to police, Shafer and his partner, Victor Guebara, were patrolling when they spotted the teenager driving a stolen car. A pursuit ensued, with the vehicle eventually crashing into a brick garage. In what prosecutors describe as an "unprovoked" attack, Shafer allegedly punched the teen four times in the head while he was on the ground.
The charges against Shafer are serious, and if found guilty of misconduct, could result in termination from the department. However, it's worth noting that his partner, Guebara, has not faced similar disciplinary action, despite also being involved in the incident.
Shafer had previously been charged criminally with the teen but saw those charges dropped earlier this year due to lack of cooperation by the alleged victim. It's unclear what role the prosecution's decision will have on Shafer's disciplinary hearing.
The case against Shafer has raised questions about police accountability and transparency. The fact that his attorney did not immediately respond to a request for comment may suggest that Shafer is facing intense scrutiny over his actions during the incident.
This is not the first time Shafer has been embroiled in controversy. He has faced multiple disciplinary charges, including allegations of excessive force and using his gun improperly. In 2019, he was involved in a high-profile lawsuit alleging that he and other officers engaged in an unlawful search warrant raid on an apartment, where no contraband was found.
The Chicago Police Department has been criticized for its handling of Shafer's disciplinary hearing, with some arguing that the case should be heard by an independent arbitrator rather than the police board. However, this decision is now set to be reviewed by the state Supreme Court.