City of Houston moves forward with housing complex near toxic ash site

Houston Moves Forward with Controversial Low-Income Housing Project Despite Toxic Ash Concerns

The City of Houston appears poised to proceed with the highly contentious development of a low-income housing complex, despite the presence of toxic ash next door at a former trash incinerator site. Plans for The Pointe at Bayou Bend were initially put on hold in 2024 following the discovery of hazardous materials near the construction site.

Federal agents recently conducted an investigation at the property, collecting soil samples to assess the site's safety. However, it appears that those findings have not hindered the project's progress. According to the Houston Housing Authority's annual report, the complex is now slated for occupancy as early as March 1.

Critics of the project point to a series of red flags, including four active environmental violations at the property, with three related to improper handling of industrial solid waste. In 2024, former HHA Director David Northern resigned amid heightened scrutiny of the agency, just months after purchasing the land for the project from the prominent Cockrell family.

The site's history is marked by allegations of neglect and disregard for safety protocols. Former Mayor John Whitmire expressed outrage at the time, stating that "no one should have ever approved" the project. It remains to be seen whether the new administration will adhere to those sentiments or push forward with plans that raise significant concerns about public health and environmental safety.

The city's decision to move forward with The Pointe at Bayou Bend has sparked intense debate, highlighting deep-seated issues with affordable housing and corporate influence in Houston's government.
 
๐Ÿค” I don't know about this, folks... it's like they're trying to build a house on shaky ground ๐ŸŒ†. These toxic ash concerns are legit - you can't just ignore 'em ๐Ÿ”ด. It's all about prioritizing profits over people's lives ๐Ÿ’ธ. We need to ask ourselves if we really want to risk our health and well-being for the sake of affordable housing ๐Ÿ .

It's also a reminder that power dynamics play a big role in decision-making ๐Ÿค. The fact that the Cockrell family was able to sell the land to HHA without much scrutiny is a red flag ๐Ÿ”Ž. We need more transparency and accountability in our systems ๐Ÿ’ช.

Ultimately, it's up to us to hold our leaders accountable for making decisions that impact our community ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ. We need to be vigilant and make sure that the voices of those who matter most are being heard ๐Ÿ‘‚.
 
๐Ÿค” this is crazy... i mean, i get it, affordable housing is super important but come on! toxic ash is a huge red flag. can't the city be more careful? ๐ŸŒช๏ธ they're basically putting people's health at risk for the sake of progress. what about the former director who resigned due to all the shady dealings? that says a lot about how corrupt some people in power can get... ๐Ÿ’ธ
 
its all about the benjamins ๐Ÿ’ธ can't believe they're prioritizing profits over people's health ๐Ÿค• toxic ash is no joke, who cares if its gonna cost a bit more to clean up ๐Ÿ˜’
 
Umm.. I don't know how much more toxic this can get lol ๐Ÿคข. So the City of Houston is gonna build a low-income housing complex next to a toxic ash site from a trash incinerator? That's just crazy talk! ๐Ÿšฎ What's wrong with doing some due diligence and investigating these environmental concerns properly before moving forward? I mean, come on... four active environmental violations and three related to improper handling of industrial solid waste? That's not something you can just sweep under the rug. ๐Ÿงน

And what about former HHA Director David Northern's resignation in 2024? You'd think that would've raised some red flags. And now his buddy John Whitmire is just gonna let it slide and move forward with plans that are literally putting people's health at risk? ๐Ÿ˜’ That just doesn't sit right with me.

Sources, please! I need to see the investigation report from federal agents before I can even consider this project moving forward. This is all too fishy ๐ŸŸ.
 
this is so crazy ๐Ÿคฏ like who lets a toxic ash site near a low-income housing complex? seems super irresponsible to me... and it's not just the environmental concerns, it's also about fairness & equality... shouldn't our gov be making sure ppl have safe & healthy places to live? ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ’š
 
๐Ÿค” This whole thing is just wild. Can't believe they're pushing through with a project that could be straight up poisonous. I mean, I get it, affordable housing is a huge issue, but come on! The city should at least have some basic safety protocols in place before allowing people to move into a toxic environment. It's not like the developers are gonna give up their sweet, sweet profits for nothing. ๐Ÿค‘

And what really gets my goat is that this whole thing started back in 2024 when there were already red flags waving around. The former director quitting mid-term? Yeah, that raises some eyebrows. I don't trust it one bit. It's all about lining the pockets of those with deep connections, rather than doing what's right for the community. ๐Ÿšซ

I'm not sure how much longer we can keep ignoring the health risks associated with this project. As a Houstonian, I should be proud to call this city home, but when it comes down to it, I'd rather my family and friends live somewhere safe and clean. ๐Ÿ’ธ
 
๐Ÿšจ this is just so messed up the fact that houston is pushing through with a low-income housing project despite the toxic ash next door is just insane I mean like what even is the city thinking at this point do they not care about people's health and safety? it's not like this is a new development or anything, there's already been so much scrutiny of the project and yet the city is still moving forward with it. ๐Ÿคฏ

it's also really interesting that the former hha director resigned after purchasing the land from the cockrell family and now we're seeing how the new administration is handling this whole thing I just hope they don't get caught up in corporate influence like their predecessors did. affordable housing should be a priority, not some big corporation's bottom line.

I don't think it's too much to ask for a little transparency and accountability when it comes to public health and environmental safety especially when it involves something as critical as housing for low-income families. ๐Ÿ ๐Ÿ’ช
 
omg u guys i just saw this news and i'm literally shaking my head i mean i get that affordable housing is a huge issue but toxic ash next door tho?! it's like they're playing russian roulette with the lives of low-income families and their kids ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿ’” i'm not even kidding when i say i'd rather live in a cardboard box than risk my life because of some greedy corporate deal ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ‘Ž

and can we talk about the fact that the former HHA director just so happens to buy the land from the Cockrell family and then resigns?! it's like they're trying to cover their tracks or something ๐Ÿคฅ๐Ÿšซ i'm not buying it (no pun intended)
 
I'm so worried about this new low-income housing project ๐Ÿค•. I mean, the fact that there are toxic ash concerns right next door is just red flag after red flag ๐Ÿšจ. Four active environmental violations? That's not okay! And to think they're already planning for occupancy in March... what if something bad happens and people get sick or hurt? ๐Ÿ˜ท As a parent, it's hard enough knowing that our kids are exposed to all sorts of dangers on the playground without worrying about them being exposed to toxic ash at home ๐Ÿคฏ. The city needs to do better than just pushing through with plans that put people's health at risk ๐Ÿ’”.
 
Man, this is crazy ๐Ÿคฏ! I remember when we used to talk about the importance of taking care of our environment back in the day... like, for real, who approves a project with toxic ash right next door? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ It just doesn't make sense. I'm all for affordable housing, but not at the cost of people's health and safety! ๐Ÿ’” What's wrong with waiting for those soil samples to come back or doing more testing before moving forward? It feels like they're rushing into this without thinking about the long-term consequences.

And what's up with that former HHA Director David Northern quitting amidst all this? Did he get paid off or something? ๐Ÿค‘ It's just so fishy. And don't even get me started on the Cockrell family and their connections to the city government... it's like they're trying to pull a fast one on us. ๐Ÿ˜’ I hope someone is watching over these people and making sure they do what's right for the community, not just lining their pockets with cash.

I guess what I'm saying is, let's slow down and think about this one before we start handing out keys to people's new homes. We can't just sacrifice our health and safety for the sake of progress. That's just not cool, man ๐Ÿ˜.
 
I'm really worried about this project ๐Ÿค•. I mean, we're talking toxic ash and industrial solid waste just a stone's throw away from where people are gonna be living? It's crazy. And what's even crazier is that the city is basically saying it doesn't matter if it's safe or not as long as it gets built on time ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ. I get that affordable housing is a huge issue, but can't we prioritize people's health and safety over profits for once? ๐Ÿ˜’
 
Ugh, can't believe this ๐Ÿคฏ. So they're moving ahead with the low-income housing project despite knowing there's toxic ash right next door? It just doesn't add up. I mean, four active environmental violations? That's not something to be brushed under the rug. And what about public health concerns? You can't seriously expect people living in a complex contaminated with industrial waste to be healthy ๐Ÿคข. This whole thing reeks of corporate influence and greed, which is just so frustrating ๐Ÿ˜ก. Can't we prioritize people over profits for once? ๐Ÿ’”
 
OMG, can't believe what's going down in Houston ๐Ÿคฏ! I mean, toxic ash next door and they're still pushing for this low-income housing project? That's just not right ๐Ÿ˜’. I get that affordable housing is a huge issue, but come on, safety should be the top priority here. Four environmental violations? That's a major red flag ๐Ÿ”ด. And what about all the shady stuff with the Cockrell family and David Northern? It smells like corruption ๐Ÿคข. The city needs to do better than this. March 1st is already looking suspiciously close, I hope some good comes out of it ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿฝ. But if not... well, let's just say I'll be keeping a close eye on this one ๐Ÿ‘€.
 
This is getting crazy ๐Ÿคฏ... I mean, toxic ash next door and they're still moving forward? ๐Ÿ™„ It's like they're playing a game of Russian roulette with people's lives. I get that affordable housing is a huge issue, but come on! You can't just ignore safety protocols and environmental concerns. And what's with the cocky move to start occupying the complex in March? Are they trying to be all "we got this" like it's no big deal? Newsflash: it is a big deal! ๐Ÿ˜ก What about the former director who resigned amid scrutiny? Did they just sweep that under the rug too? I'm definitely keeping an eye on this one...
 
I'm really worried about this one ๐Ÿค•. I mean, can you imagine moving into a new home only to find out it's literally toxic? It's like they're putting people's health at risk for the sake of saving money or meeting some developer's agenda. And what's with all these environmental violations? Four of them?! That's just basic negligence.

And have you noticed how this whole thing seems to be shrouded in secrecy? Like, where are the thorough investigations into the soil samples and what were the findings exactly? It feels like they're more concerned with getting it done ASAP than actually making sure it's safe for the residents.

I'm not surprised that some folks are saying it's all about corporate influence and who gets to decide on affordable housing in this city. We need real, transparent solutions to these problems, not just Band-Aid fixes that prioritize profits over people.
 
Back
Top