Corporate America is threading a needle on how to respond to the killings in Minnesota

Corporate leaders in Minnesota are grappling with how to address the recent killings of ICU nurses, including Alex Pretti at the hands of federal officers. As a result, some have chosen to speak out against the fatal shooting and President Donald Trump's broader immigration enforcement in the state. This decision comes after weeks of relative silence from major employers in Minnesota.

While some executives are taking a collective stance, others have been slower to respond. The hesitation among high-profile leaders has not stopped employees from speaking out, with over 800 tech workers signing an open letter condemning the Border Patrol's killing of Pretti and the violent surge of federal agents across cities.

Professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, author of "Trump's Ten Commandments," suggests that CEOs engage in conversations when they reach a tipping point. These moments often involve crises where the fabric of society is at risk. In such instances, executives must balance their desire to speak out against the need to avoid drawing political backlash from the administration.

Sonnenfeld notes that companies have found silence on certain issues not effective but also recognize the importance of timing and caution when addressing policy concerns. The cost of staying quiet has risen due to the potential for "brain drain" as highly skilled employees leave in response to their leaders' reluctance to take public stances on contentious issues.

In recent weeks, CEOs like Hemant Taneja of General Catalyst and Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase have taken a more subtle approach, expressing support for some immigration policies but stopping short of criticizing the administration directly.
 
I'm so shocked by what's happening to ICU nurses in Minnesota ๐Ÿคฏ. The fact that they're being killed by federal officers is just heartbreaking. I think it's about time corporate leaders speak out against this and President Trump's immigration policies, even if it means some backlash. It's like, their silence has given people the impression that nothing can be done to stop these killings, which isn't true ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ.

I don't get why CEOs are being so cautious about speaking out, though. They're worried about getting in trouble with the administration, but what's the point of having a conscience if you're just going to stay silent when something important is at stake? And I'm not saying they should be super outspoken or anything, but a little bit of public support would go a long way in showing that these killings aren't okay ๐Ÿ˜•.
 
I dont know how these corporate leaders can just sit around waiting for a tipping point to speak out about something as serious as police brutality ๐Ÿคฏ they're worried about "political backlash" but what about the lives lost? it's like they're more concerned with keeping their jobs than doing what's right. I mean, 800 tech workers are already speaking out and demanding change, why can't the CEOs just stand up for them too?! ๐Ÿ™„
 
man... corporations need to step up their game here... all these high-profile execs are still quiet about this stuff... it's like they're worried about losing that "good company" image ๐Ÿค‘ or something... 800 tech workers already speaking out is a big deal, and still nothing from the big guns? meanwhile, people are actually dying over here... ICU nurses can't even do their jobs without risking being shot by federal agents ๐Ÿ˜ก it's time for some real leadership, not just "we're concerned about the issue"... words don't cut it anymore ๐Ÿ’”
 
I'm so worried about these ICU nurses ๐Ÿค•! It's just not right that they're being killed by federal officers like this. I mean, who are we supposed to turn to if we need help? Our own people? It's crazy. And it's not just the nurses, but all the other healthcare workers too... we need better protection for our healthcare heroes ๐Ÿ’ช!
 
omg what is going on with these corporate leaders in minnesota they should be speaking out against this senseless killing of icu nurses by federal officers alex pretti's death was just devastating ๐Ÿคฏ and now these CEOs are taking their sweet time to address it like "oh no, we're really upset" NO JUST BE PROACTIVE ALREADY!!!

i mean i get it companies don't want to rock the boat but this is not the time for subtlety hemant taneja and jamie dimon you guys should be standing on the table screaming about this instead of just giving lip service ๐Ÿ™„

and what's with all these warnings about avoiding political backlash from trump yeah i get it timing is everything but some lives are worth more than a few tweets or press releases alex pretti didn't ask to die in his hospital bed because of trump's policies so let's not downplay this
 
๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ honestly, it's about time these corporate leaders stepped up (or out?) and spoke out against this senseless violence... I mean, 800+ tech workers signing an open letter? that's not just brave, that's necessary ๐Ÿš€. It's like they're saying "hey, we know our CEOs are too scared to say anything" kinda thing ๐Ÿ‘€. But kudos to those who did, and I'm sure it's not an easy decision to make, especially when you're worried about getting roasted by the administration ๐Ÿ˜’. Maybe these CEOs will finally realize that staying quiet isn't doing anyone any favors... but hey, better late than never, right? ๐Ÿ’ผ
 
Ugh, it's just so sad ๐Ÿค•... I was watching an old video of the healthcare system back in 2008 when Obama was still president and they were all like "we've got this" & now these ICU nurses are getting killed by federal officers... it's like we took two steps forward & one step back ๐Ÿ’”. It's crazy that corporations are just now speaking out, I mean I know some of them have been waiting for the right moment to strike, but come on, when did "the right moment" become never? ๐Ÿคฏ
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this ๐Ÿคฏ. I mean, I get why these CEOs are being cautious - you don't wanna mess with the big man's crowd ๐Ÿ˜ฌ. But at the same time, what's the point of having a voice if it's just gonna be watered down? Like, can't they just take a stance and own it for once? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ It's like, yeah, we get it, you're trying not to offend anyone... but isn't that just perpetuating the status quo? ๐Ÿ˜’ I mean, if 800 tech workers are willing to speak out about this, why can't the CEOs do the same? Is it really that hard to take a stand and say something is messed up? ๐Ÿค” And what's with all these half-measures? "I support some immigration policies"... like, what does that even mean? ๐Ÿ™„
 
I donโ€™t usually comment but... itโ€™s kinda wild that all these big corps are only speaking out now after all this happened ๐Ÿคฏ. I mean, I get why they wanna avoid drawing heat from the admin, but come on, the people who work there are still gonna be affected by the fallout ๐Ÿ’ธ. And yeah, some of them shoulda just jumped in sooner ๐Ÿ‘€. The thing is, if companies just sit on it, the talent pool gets all dried up and you're left with no one to hire ๐Ÿšซ. It's a catch-22 situation for sure...
 
Ugh, corporate leaders are finally talking, but I'm still not convinced they're doing it out of the goodness of their hearts ๐Ÿค”. These CEOs think they can just wait until the situation gets desperate enough to speak up, like they're some kind of crisis managers or something. Newsflash: speaking up isn't always easy, and sometimes you gotta take a stand even if it means ruffling some feathers.

I mean, come on, over 800 tech workers are already signing an open letter, and CEOs are still waiting for that "tipping point" to strike ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. Meanwhile, people are losing their lives to senseless violence, and we're stuck in this limbo of corporate indecision.

It's all about timing, right? When does it become too late to speak out? And what's the real motivation here? Is it genuinely a desire to address the issue or just a PR stunt to save face when the next crisis hits?
 
Wow ๐Ÿ˜ฎ - can't believe these corporate leaders are taking so long to speak out on this one... it's like they're waiting for someone else to do the right thing ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ Interesting ๐Ÿ’ก that Prof Sonnenfeld is saying CEOs wait till there's a tipping point before talking out - what's their definition of "tipping point" tho? ๐Ÿค”
 
I'm telling you, something's off about this whole thing ๐Ÿค”. These corporate leaders are suddenly speaking out against federal officers killing ICU nurses? It feels like they're trying to buy brownie points with the public while avoiding any real controversy with Trump. And let's not forget, these CEOs who are finally breaking their silence are only expressing support for "some" immigration policies - it's like they're dancing around the issue ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ. I mean, where were these leaders when hundreds of ICE detainees went missing in 2020? Now that they're speaking out, is this just a PR stunt to avoid losing top talent?
 
I was just thinking about the new ice cream shop that opened up downtown ๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿ˜‹. They have this crazy unique flavor called "S'mores Galore" and I need to try it ASAP! Anyway, back to this news... what's with all these corporate leaders taking forever to speak out? I mean, I get it, they don't want to rock the boat, but like, how can you not take a stance on something that affects so many people? I'm not saying they should be super loud and confrontational, but just a little bit of support would go a long way. And honestly, who knows what kind of impact silence has on employees... might drive them crazy! ๐Ÿคฏ
 
Ugh, can't believe big corps in Minnesota are taking ages to speak out against this ๐Ÿ˜ฉ. I mean, 800 tech workers already did it and now CEOs are finally getting on board...but still so slow ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ. This "tipping point" thing sounds like a bunch of corporate mumbo-jumbo to me...when exactly is the right time? Some people are saying silence isn't golden anymore, but others think that's too harsh ๐Ÿ’”. I guess what really gets my goat is that these CEOs are still being super cautious and not willing to take a clear stance on immigration issues ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. It's like they're worried about offending the powers that be instead of speaking truth to power ๐Ÿ‘Š. Anyway, here's hoping more leaders will step up soon...before more lives get lost ๐Ÿ’€.
 
I'm really impressed with how these tech workers are speaking up despite their bosses not being loud enough ๐Ÿคฉ. It shows that there's still a lot of passion and commitment to making a difference in their communities. The idea that CEOs are waiting for a tipping point to speak out is kinda true, but I think it's also important for them to take risks and be proactive when they see something that's just not right. I mean, 800+ people signing an open letter is a big deal ๐Ÿ“ˆ! It's great to see companies like General Catalyst and JPMorgan Chase taking small steps towards being more vocal on immigration policies. We need more leaders like them who are willing to have tough conversations without getting too caught up in politics ๐Ÿ’ฌ.
 
I'm so worried about our healthcare workers ๐Ÿค•๐Ÿš‘. These poor ICU nurses are like angels in uniform, and we should be doing everything to make sure they're protected from harm ๐Ÿ’ฏ. It's not just about them; it's about all the families who rely on their care when they need it most โค๏ธ.

I don't blame CEOs for being hesitant to speak out against the administration โ€“ I get it, they might face backlash ๐Ÿค”. But at some point, we need leaders to take a stand and say enough is enough! ๐Ÿ’ช It's not just about them; it's about all of us who care about our country's values and people ๐Ÿ‘Š.

I do think it's great that employees are speaking out in solidarity with the ICU nurses ๐Ÿค. We need more voices like theirs, especially from tech workers who can make a difference with their collective voice ๐Ÿ’ป. Let's hope more CEOs follow suit soon! ๐Ÿ’•
 
OMG, this is getting serious ๐Ÿคฏ, I'm so proud of all those 800+ tech workers who are speaking up about this! They're not going to let the company's fear of backlash hold them back from taking a stand for what's right ๐Ÿ˜Š. I think companies have to start prioritizing their employees' values and well-being over profit margins ๐Ÿค‘. If CEOs are worried about drawing heat, they need to take a closer look at why this is happening in the first place - is it because of inadequate support or resources? We can't just sit back and expect our leaders to speak up for us when we're under attack ๐Ÿ’ช.
 
man... this is just so messed up ๐Ÿค• it's like these corporate leaders are stuck between a rock and a hard place - do they speak out and risk alienating the admin, or stay mum and let their employees suffer in silence? it's not just about the nurses who got killed, but also about the people leaving their jobs because their leaders won't take a stand on issues that matter ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

and you know what really gets me - the fact that these CEOs are only now starting to speak out. like, where were they when it mattered? why did it take an incident like this for them to finally decide to do something ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ it's not just about being loud or silent, it's about doing what's right and taking responsibility as leaders ๐Ÿ’ฏ

and Sonnenfeld is right on point too - CEOs need to find that tipping point where they can have a conversation without getting shot down by the admin. but it's not just about timing, it's about having the guts to do what's right in the first place ๐Ÿ˜Ž
 
Ugh, these corporate leaders are taking forever to speak out on this ๐Ÿ˜ฉ. I mean, over 800 tech workers already did it ๐Ÿคฏ, and now they're still waiting for their CEOs to do the same? It's like they're trying to avoid a public backlash, but in the end, it just leads to people leaving the company because of it ๐Ÿšช. And what's with the "tipping point" idea from that professor? Can't they see how this affects real people who are losing their lives over these issues? It's not about politics, it's about human life ๐Ÿ’€.
 
Back
Top