US Election Officials Bracing for Potential Nationalization of Voting Under Trump's Plan
As President Donald Trump continues to push Republican lawmakers and officials to intervene in his behalf, a stark reminder of the 2020 US presidential election is becoming increasingly relevant. The current pressure campaign evokes memories of Trump's aggressive tactics during that time, which left many election officials feeling vulnerable and fearful for their safety.
In order to address growing concerns about widespread voter fraud claims made by Trump, Republican lawmakers are being urged to "nationalize the voting" process in at least 15 states, with a goal of taking over local control of elections. The idea is an alarmingly similar concept to the pressure campaigns that Trump and his allies mounted against election officials during the contentious 2020 presidential election.
During this time, election officials faced armed protests outside offices, threats against their families, subpoenas for voter data, and months of uncertainty about whether they would be sued or even arrested if they performed their duties. In the aftermath of the 2020 election, a number of election officials have received death threats and experienced increased security risks.
While Trump's most recent call to nationalize voting has sparked pushback from some Republican lawmakers and figures, there are concerns that internal guardrails within his administration that previously prevented him from implementing similar actions may no longer be in place.
Election experts believe that this has made it more difficult for election officials to protect themselves against future threats. The fact that the men and women of principle who would enforce these protections have largely been removed or retrained, leaving them to rely on courts and state and local election officials as their primary defenses is a significant concern.
"This line of defense is largely gone," said David Becker, an election lawyer with the nonprofit Center for Election Innovation & Research. "The primary qualification for being hired by this administration โ particularly in those key roles in the Justice Department and Department of Homeland Security โ is loyalty to this man."
Becker stated that courts and state and local election officials are now faced with a greater risk of damage if Trump's actions continue, warning that court challenges can take time, during which "untold damage" can be done to erode public trust and the officials caught in the middle.
Justin Levitt, an election law professor at Loyola Marymount University, noted that while the president has some ability to influence elections, his power is limited by the courts. Levitt warned that Trump's messaging will likely become "much, much worse" this year as a result of increased support from federal officials, and emphasized that it is up to individuals like him and others to choose whether or not to believe in Trump's claims.
Ultimately, it remains to be seen how far Trump's push for nationalizing elections will go.
As President Donald Trump continues to push Republican lawmakers and officials to intervene in his behalf, a stark reminder of the 2020 US presidential election is becoming increasingly relevant. The current pressure campaign evokes memories of Trump's aggressive tactics during that time, which left many election officials feeling vulnerable and fearful for their safety.
In order to address growing concerns about widespread voter fraud claims made by Trump, Republican lawmakers are being urged to "nationalize the voting" process in at least 15 states, with a goal of taking over local control of elections. The idea is an alarmingly similar concept to the pressure campaigns that Trump and his allies mounted against election officials during the contentious 2020 presidential election.
During this time, election officials faced armed protests outside offices, threats against their families, subpoenas for voter data, and months of uncertainty about whether they would be sued or even arrested if they performed their duties. In the aftermath of the 2020 election, a number of election officials have received death threats and experienced increased security risks.
While Trump's most recent call to nationalize voting has sparked pushback from some Republican lawmakers and figures, there are concerns that internal guardrails within his administration that previously prevented him from implementing similar actions may no longer be in place.
Election experts believe that this has made it more difficult for election officials to protect themselves against future threats. The fact that the men and women of principle who would enforce these protections have largely been removed or retrained, leaving them to rely on courts and state and local election officials as their primary defenses is a significant concern.
"This line of defense is largely gone," said David Becker, an election lawyer with the nonprofit Center for Election Innovation & Research. "The primary qualification for being hired by this administration โ particularly in those key roles in the Justice Department and Department of Homeland Security โ is loyalty to this man."
Becker stated that courts and state and local election officials are now faced with a greater risk of damage if Trump's actions continue, warning that court challenges can take time, during which "untold damage" can be done to erode public trust and the officials caught in the middle.
Justin Levitt, an election law professor at Loyola Marymount University, noted that while the president has some ability to influence elections, his power is limited by the courts. Levitt warned that Trump's messaging will likely become "much, much worse" this year as a result of increased support from federal officials, and emphasized that it is up to individuals like him and others to choose whether or not to believe in Trump's claims.
Ultimately, it remains to be seen how far Trump's push for nationalizing elections will go.