Elmhurst 'high-rise' development stirs worry over gentrification in Queens

Queens' Elmhurst Neighborhood Sees Intense Backlash to High-Rise Development Proposal Amid Fears of Gentrification.

Community members are up in arms over a proposal to build a 13-story residential tower on Queens Boulevard, citing concerns that the project could fuel gentrification and push out long-time residents. The development, which includes 79 affordable units, has sparked intense opposition from local residents who fear it will lead to an influx of luxury housing, high-end stores, and rising rents.

The proposed rezoning of the area has been met with fierce resistance from Queens Community Board 4, with members voting overwhelmingly against it in June. Despite a housing shortage, including a critical lack of affordable units, board members argue that the project does not align with the character of the neighborhood, which is currently dominated by low-rise homes and light manufacturing.

Critics point to the site's current status as a hub for small businesses and Asian American residents, who are already struggling with rising costs. "Just one high-rise development like this can pave the way for more luxury housing that will ultimately price out our Asian American small businesses and elderly residents," said Brianna Cea, a community board member.

In contrast, developer Andrew Esposito claims to be engaged in talks with local officials and community members to address their concerns. However, his firm's plans have yet to alleviate worries about the impact on the neighborhood's character.

Councilmember Shekar Krishnan, who will preside over the development proposal, has expressed a commitment to ensuring that new housing built in the area prioritizes affordability and community needs. "Elmhurst is very dense – future developments need to include community infrastructure, prioritize green space, and ensure supportive and educational spaces," he said.

Despite concerns about gentrification, some residents remain open to development as long as it addresses existing issues like poverty and crime. Lester Lin, a lifelong Elmhurst resident who owns several businesses, acknowledged the neighborhood's troubled past but expressed hope for positive change. "You had smoke shops and people selling live chickens on the street," he said. "Now you're bettering the neighborhood because now the streets are cleaner."

The controversy highlights ongoing debates in Queens about growth and development, with some residents fighting to preserve the area's character and others advocating for increased housing supply. The Elmhurst/Corona proposal is just one of several high-profile developments currently before the City Council, all vying for attention and scrutiny from a community that is increasingly divided over issues of gentrification, displacement, and affordability.
 
can u imagine if every high-rise dev in queens just popped up outta nowhere like this? it's gonna mess with the character of the neighborhood so much πŸ€―πŸ“ˆ

okay so let's make a diagram to visualize this πŸ—ΊοΈ
```
+---------------+
| Current Elmhurst |
| (low-rise homes, |
| Asian American |
| small businesses)|
+---------------+
^
| Proposal for 13-story tower
| (79 affordable units)
v
+---------------+
| Potential Future Elmhurst |
| (luxury housing, high-end |
| stores, rising rents) |
+---------------+
```
i think councilmember Krishnan is on the right track with his focus on community infrastructure and affordable housing 🌳🏠

but we need more support from devs like Andrew Esposito to ensure that their plans align with community needs 🀝
 
πŸ€” I think this whole gentrification thing is super complicated and can go both ways. Like, on one hand, Elmhurst does need more affordable housing, especially with all the young families moving in. But at the same time, we don't want to just throw up a bunch of high-end condos and push out the people who have been living here for decades πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. It's like, my grandma used to have her little shop on Queens Blvd and it was super chill. Now I see all these big chain stores moving in and it feels different 😐. Developer guy's trying to make it work with affordable units but I'm not sure that's enough πŸ’Έ. Can we just find a balance here? 🀝
 
i totally get why ppl are against this project πŸ€” it's like they're trying to rip out the heart of the neighborhood πŸ˜” small businesses and asian american residents have been here for years and now suddenly they're being pushed out by luxury housing and rising rents? it's not fair ⚠️ the community needs affordable units and green spaces, not just fancy high-rises 🌳 councilmember Krishnan is trying to do the right thing but i wonder if his words will be enough πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ we need more than just promises of community infrastructure and supportive spaces... we need action πŸ’ͺ
 
πŸ€” The whole thing is kinda crazy right now... I mean, on one hand, you gotta acknowledge that Elmhurst is in dire need of new housing options - it's got like, no affordable units whatsoever 🏠😬. But at the same time, I get why these long-time residents are freaking out about gentrification and losing their community character πŸ˜•. It's just hard to see how a bunch of luxury high-rises and fancy stores is gonna magically solve poverty and crime in the area πŸ’ΈπŸš«.

For me, it's all about finding that balance between growth and preserving what makes Elmhurst special πŸŒˆπŸ’–. I wish the developers could be more open with their plans and really listen to the community's concerns πŸ‘‚πŸ—£οΈ. And on a bigger note, it's time for the City Council to get serious about addressing affordability and gentrification in Queens once and for all πŸ’ͺ🏽🌟
 
πŸ€” I think the concerns about gentrification are valid, but at the same time, you gotta remember that Elmhurst needs more housing options, especially affordable ones πŸ πŸ’°. It's a catch-22 situation. The community is worried about losing their small businesses and Asian American culture, which is totally understandable. But if they don't allow this development, it'll just lead to even more homelessness and poverty problems in the area 🚽πŸ‘₯.

It's also worth noting that some of these concerns are rooted in a lack of understanding and fear-mongering πŸ˜•. I mean, yeah, one high-rise might not be the end of the world, but it's not like the developers are proposing to turn Elmhurst into some kind of luxury resort πŸŒ΄πŸ–οΈ.

What really gets me is that there's this divide in the community between those who want to preserve the character of the neighborhood and those who just want more housing options πŸ’β€β™€οΈ. It's not like it's a straightforward issue. There needs to be some compromise and communication between the developers, local officials, and the community 🀝.
 
Ugh, this is like such a heavy topic πŸ€•. I get why people are against this development, it's true, our Asian American communities have been struggling with rising costs for ages. And what really gets me is that there are already affordable units being built in the same project... 79 is not even enough to make a dent in the housing shortage.

I think we need to find a balance here. I'm all for growth and development, but it has to be done thoughtfully. We need to prioritize community needs, like green space and supportive spaces for low-income residents. And yeah, let's get rid of those smoke shops and live chickens on the street πŸ˜‚.

It's not just about gentrification, either. It's about making sure that our communities are actually benefiting from all this growth. We need to listen to the concerns of people like Brianna Cea and Lester Lin. They're not just speaking for themselves, they're speaking for a whole community that's been marginalized for too long.

I wish Councilmember Krishnan was more specific about what "community infrastructure" means, though πŸ€”. What does it look like in practice? How can we ensure that these new developments are actually serving the needs of everyone, not just a privileged few?

Anyway, I'm all ears if anyone has some thoughts on this one πŸ’¬.
 
the more i think about it, the more i feel like we're at a crossroads in queens... on one hand, we need more affordable housing ASAP πŸ€• but on the other hand, some places are literally being pushed out by luxury developments πŸ πŸ’Έ my grandma used to own a small shop on queen's boulevard and she always said it was super community-oriented... now it feels like that's just a memory πŸ˜” what's the compromise?
 
I'm telling you, this whole gentrification thing is like a powder keg waiting to blow 🀯. You got these developers, they're just swooping in with their fancy plans, thinking they can just buy up the neighborhood and turn it into some upscale playground. Meanwhile, the people who've been living here for years are being pushed out by rising costs πŸ’Έ.

I mean, come on, 79 affordable units sounds like a good start, but let's be real, it's not gonna make up for the loss of community character. This neighborhood is already struggling with poverty and crime, and now we're supposed to just gloss over all that and bring in some fancy condos? 🚫 It's like the city's trying to create a whole new bubble economy, one that excludes everyone except those who can afford it.

And what about the small businesses, you know, the Asian American-owned shops and services that make this neighborhood so unique? They're being squeezed out by rising rents and gentrification is just a fancy word for "displacement". 🀝 It's like we're seeing a microcosm of the national conversation, folks. Can we afford to lose our neighborhoods' identity in the name of progress? I don't think so πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ.

We need more community-driven development, not just some fancy rezoning deal that favors a select few. This whole thing is like a game of musical chairs, where whoever gets left standing wins, but at what cost? πŸ’”
 
πŸ€” This whole thing with the Elmhurst neighborhood is super complicated. On one hand, you've got people who are worried about gentrification pushing out long-time residents and small businesses. They're right to be concerned - it's a major issue in Queens right now. I mean, we know that when big developments come into an area like this, it can lead to rising costs of living and displacement of local communities.

On the other hand, you've got people who are saying, 'Hey, we need more housing units!' And they're not wrong either. The affordable housing shortage is a huge problem in New York City right now, so something needs to be done. But the thing is, when you're building 79 affordable units and 13 stories of luxury housing on top of it...it's just not a balanced approach.

I think what Councilmember Krishnan was trying to say with that quote is that you need to prioritize community needs and make sure that new developments are inclusive and sustainable. It's all about finding that balance between growth and preserving the character of a neighborhood. πŸŒ† It's a tough spot to be in, but I think we can learn from this controversy and come up with some real solutions that benefit everyone.
 
omg i feel like these ppl are worried 4 the worst case scenario πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ but like can't we just compromise? maybe build it with some affordable units & mix in some shops & services for small businesses too? πŸ’‘ also what's wrong with a lil bit of gentrification if it brings in more revenue & jobs to the area? 😊 i know ppl are worried bout displacin existing residents but we gotta think about the bigger picture, right? 🀝
 
I'm so worried about this proposed high-rise development in Elmhurst... it's like they're playing with fire here πŸš’. I get that we need more affordable housing, but do we have to sacrifice the very character of our neighborhoods for progress? This proposed 13-story tower is just a Band-Aid on a much deeper issue – gentrification. It's like, what's next? A luxury mall on top of an independent Asian market? πŸ’πŸ‘‹

And don't even get me started on the lack of affordable units... 79 is a good start, but it's peanuts compared to the demand. I mean, come on, Queens needs more than just tokenistic housing solutions. We need a comprehensive plan that addresses poverty, crime, and community infrastructure.

I love how Councilmember Krishnan is trying to prioritize community needs, though πŸ™. It's about time we start putting people over profits in this city. But I'm still worried that our voices won't be heard amidst all the noise...
 
Back
Top