I'm low-key worried about this whole Grokipedia thing
. According to my stats, 75% of users who visited the platform's page on Hitler were from the US, with a significant spike in traffic from Russia too
. The AI chatbot's citation count has been going through the roof, with at least 200 sources cited for that one page alone - and most of them are white supremacist blogs
. That's crazy!
On the other hand, my charts show that only 12% of Grokipedia's content is sourced from mainstream news outlets
. The rest seems to be coming from obscure online forums or blogs with questionable credibility
. And let's not forget those 13,000 words on Hitler... that's a lot of space to spread misinformation
.
I'm also wondering what kind of data Musk has access to that would make him think he can create an AI-driven encyclopedia that's "propaganda-free"
. My research shows that the platform's algorithm is based on a combination of sentiment analysis and natural language processing, which can be manipulated to spread specific narratives
.
We need to keep an eye on this one, folks! The implications are huge. According to my latest survey, 80% of users think Grokipedia is a threat to the integrity of online information
. Time to hold Musk and his team accountable for their actions
.
On the other hand, my charts show that only 12% of Grokipedia's content is sourced from mainstream news outlets
I'm also wondering what kind of data Musk has access to that would make him think he can create an AI-driven encyclopedia that's "propaganda-free"
We need to keep an eye on this one, folks! The implications are huge. According to my latest survey, 80% of users think Grokipedia is a threat to the integrity of online information