England football: The great number nine decline - where have English strikers gone?

The article discusses the current state of English football and the country's men's team, particularly in regards to their striking options. It mentions that while Harry Kane is a talented player, he is not a replacement for the classic "number nine" shirt, which was traditionally worn by strikers who could lead the line and create scoring opportunities.

The article quotes former England striker Alan Shearer, who played as part of the iconic strike partnership with Chris Sutton in the 1990s, as saying that there's "a massive problem" with the current state of English football when it comes to finding reliable strikers. Shearer believes that playing with two strikers is not an option for teams like England, and that the country needs to find a way to reinvent the traditional partnership between the number nine and the wide forwards.

The article also quotes Michael Owen, who won the Premier League Golden Boot in 1997-98 while playing alongside Shearer. Owen believes that if he were to emerge from retirement now, he would likely be considered as a wide forward rather than a striker, due to the shift in styles of play and the increasing emphasis on pace and agility over traditional striking abilities.

The article concludes by highlighting the need for England to find a solution to their striking problems before the next World Cup, which will take place in 2022.
 
OMG u guys I was at this footy game with my bf last wkend and we were like totally dissecting the team's formation πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈπŸ’” I think england needs to find a way to revive the old-school striker vibe like alan shearer said it's not just about harry kane but finding that special partnership between the no.9 and the wide forward is key πŸ”“πŸ‘« i mean michael owen makes a point about pace and agility being more important now but can't we just have one player who's all rounded? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈπŸ˜‚ anyway can we pls talk more about england's next world cup chances? are they gonna make it? 😬
 
I think its crazy that people still talk about the number nine like its a myth! πŸ˜‚ I mean, Kane's a great player and all but he can't just fill the role of a classic striker on his own. Teams need players who can create chances for each other not just score goals. And what's with the nostalgia for Shearer and Sutton? They were legends in their time but that was 20+ years ago, its time to move on.
 
I think it's kinda weird that these legends like Shearer and Owen are saying we're missing out on something special with just one striker? I mean, Kane is an amazing player, but can't he lead the line sometimes? πŸ€” It sounds to me like they're looking for a magic solution, but what if it's just about adapting our style of play? Maybe instead of having that traditional 9 and wingers, we should have more flexible forwards who can do both? πŸƒβ€β™‚οΈ I'm not saying it's easy, but it seems like England's got some great minds trying to figure it out! 😊
 
So I'm thinking, what's really going on here is that English football has lost its way when it comes to creating that perfect strike partnership. Alan Shearer brings up some valid points about the current crop of strikers just not being able to fill the void left by the likes of Wayne Rooney or Michael Owen back in their prime πŸ€”.

It's true, Harry Kane is an incredible talent, but does he truly have the vision and creativity to create scoring opportunities on his own? And as for playing with two strikers... I mean, we've seen it work before, but it's not like it's a new strategy or anything πŸ˜…. The issue lies in finding that one special player who can lead the line and make something happen when needed.

I think what Michael Owen said about his own playing style changing over time is really insightful. It's not just about being a striker; it's about having the pace, agility, and intelligence to outmaneuver defenders and create space for yourself or your teammates πŸ‘Ÿ.

Anyway, England needs to find a solution to this problem ASAP πŸ•°οΈ, especially before the World Cup in 2022. Can't have them showing up unprepared like they did in 2018... 😳
 
Wow πŸ˜‚, can you imagine playing with two strikers? That's like me trying to do both my job and become a professional gamer at the same time 🀣! Alan Shearer makes a valid point about the traditional partnership though. I think what's missing is that teams are playing so possession-based football now, it's hard for one player to make an impact on their own without anyone else making space for them πŸ€”. Michael Owen's thoughts on adapting to the new style of play is interesting too... I mean, who needs a golden boot when you can just be super speedy and agile? πŸ˜‚
 
man, i feel like england's strikers are stuck in a rut 🀯 they're not creating enough chances on goal and it's all on the shoulders of harry kane πŸ™Œ but honestly, he's only human πŸ˜… and even if he scores every game, it's not gonna be enough to take them all the way. i think they need to rethink their approach, maybe play with a few different strikers at once, or find someone who can bring that extra something special πŸ’‘ like alan shearer used to do back in the day πŸ™Œ or even just work on getting those wide forwards more involved in creating scoring chances πŸƒβ€β™‚οΈ
 
I mean, it's like, what's up with these old school strikers? They're all about the goals, but can they create something out of nothing? I'm watching these England games and it's always "Harry Kane is our best striker" πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. Newsflash: having one guy who scores 30 goals a season isn't enough. We need someone who can make magic happen on the pitch, not just put the ball in the net 🎩. And what's with this "number nine" business? It's like they're trying to recreate the past or something. Can't we just adapt to the game and find new ways to score? πŸ˜’
 
Back
Top