UK Energy Suppliers Struggle with Finances Amid Rising Wholesale Gas Prices
A report from regulator Ofgem reveals that more energy suppliers are falling short on their financial resilience targets, sparking concerns about the industry's ability to weather future crises.
The introduction of capital targets last year aimed to ensure financial stability among suppliers. However, according to a National Audit Office calculation, the added costs of complying with these rules equated to £94 per household bill, amounting to £2.7 billion during the 2021-22 gas crisis. The regulator's efforts to strengthen suppliers' balance sheets came too late for some, leaving them struggling to meet their targets.
Ofgem's latest assessment shows that an additional three suppliers have failed to meet their financial resilience targets since June, bringing the total number of underperforming firms to five out of 23. While this is a significant proportion, Ofgem claims it is working proactively with these companies to help them improve their plans and meet the target.
However, critics argue that Ofgem's approach is too soft. Unlike banks, which are subject to regular stress tests and penalties for underperformance, the energy market lacks transparency. Centrica's chief executive has called for suppliers who fail to meet targets to be barred from taking on new customers immediately, a measure that Ofgem has not adopted.
The stakes are lower in the retail energy market compared to banking, but the lack of clarity around Ofgem's criteria for what constitutes a "credible plan" means it is impossible to determine how much extra time suppliers will receive. The regulator's reluctance to disclose details on underperforming firms also undermines the credibility of its get-tough regime.
As wholesale gas prices continue to fluctuate, the industry's reliance on hedging arrangements makes it increasingly vulnerable to market shocks. With Ofgem's targets not providing sufficient deterrents for suppliers to improve their financial resilience, it remains to be seen whether the regulator can effectively prevent another major crisis.
A report from regulator Ofgem reveals that more energy suppliers are falling short on their financial resilience targets, sparking concerns about the industry's ability to weather future crises.
The introduction of capital targets last year aimed to ensure financial stability among suppliers. However, according to a National Audit Office calculation, the added costs of complying with these rules equated to £94 per household bill, amounting to £2.7 billion during the 2021-22 gas crisis. The regulator's efforts to strengthen suppliers' balance sheets came too late for some, leaving them struggling to meet their targets.
Ofgem's latest assessment shows that an additional three suppliers have failed to meet their financial resilience targets since June, bringing the total number of underperforming firms to five out of 23. While this is a significant proportion, Ofgem claims it is working proactively with these companies to help them improve their plans and meet the target.
However, critics argue that Ofgem's approach is too soft. Unlike banks, which are subject to regular stress tests and penalties for underperformance, the energy market lacks transparency. Centrica's chief executive has called for suppliers who fail to meet targets to be barred from taking on new customers immediately, a measure that Ofgem has not adopted.
The stakes are lower in the retail energy market compared to banking, but the lack of clarity around Ofgem's criteria for what constitutes a "credible plan" means it is impossible to determine how much extra time suppliers will receive. The regulator's reluctance to disclose details on underperforming firms also undermines the credibility of its get-tough regime.
As wholesale gas prices continue to fluctuate, the industry's reliance on hedging arrangements makes it increasingly vulnerable to market shocks. With Ofgem's targets not providing sufficient deterrents for suppliers to improve their financial resilience, it remains to be seen whether the regulator can effectively prevent another major crisis.