The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) has announced its closure of operations in the besieged territory, citing a "failure" in its mission to deliver aid. But what exactly was the foundation's approach, and how did it fail those seeking assistance?
Since May, GHF was the sole distributor of aid in Gaza, with Israeli soldiers and American subcontractors killing nearly 3,000 Palestinians who tried to access food or medical supplies. The organization's model, which relied on private logistics and security firms, was widely criticized by humanitarian experts as a disaster.
Gaza health officials reported that doctors without borders described the GHF distribution points as "sites of orchestrated killing." Medical teams caring for nearly 900 patients wounded at the four GHF hubs suffered this dire situation.
The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification declared a famine in Gaza City in August, with at least 175 Palestinians dying of starvation within its first month. GHF did not expand operations beyond its four distribution sites, allowing thousands to travel long distances to access aid β only to face deadly queues and gunfire from Israeli forces or private contractors.
Critics argue that the GHF model was a symptom of the problem, rather than a solution, created by Israel's occupation of Gaza and its blockade on aid. The organization's chair, Johnnie Moore, an evangelical minister and former Trump administration advisor, defended the foundation's approach, stating that it would not abandon its NGO status but instead expand its operations with the Civil-Military Coordination Center in southern Israel.
Humanitarian experts warn that the GHF's tactics could be replicated by the Board of Peace, a proposed entity meant to govern Gaza's rebuilding under Trump's 20-point plan. This plan excludes Palestinian voices and ignores previous UN resolutions calling for an end to occupation.
Aid groups are concerned that this model normalizes private logistics and security firms managing humanitarian aid to turn a profit. They fear it could lead to further exploitation of desperate populations in conflict zones across the world.
As the situation in Gaza continues to deteriorate, aid groups are calling on those with influence to support their efforts and protect the integrity of humanitarian work.
Since May, GHF was the sole distributor of aid in Gaza, with Israeli soldiers and American subcontractors killing nearly 3,000 Palestinians who tried to access food or medical supplies. The organization's model, which relied on private logistics and security firms, was widely criticized by humanitarian experts as a disaster.
Gaza health officials reported that doctors without borders described the GHF distribution points as "sites of orchestrated killing." Medical teams caring for nearly 900 patients wounded at the four GHF hubs suffered this dire situation.
The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification declared a famine in Gaza City in August, with at least 175 Palestinians dying of starvation within its first month. GHF did not expand operations beyond its four distribution sites, allowing thousands to travel long distances to access aid β only to face deadly queues and gunfire from Israeli forces or private contractors.
Critics argue that the GHF model was a symptom of the problem, rather than a solution, created by Israel's occupation of Gaza and its blockade on aid. The organization's chair, Johnnie Moore, an evangelical minister and former Trump administration advisor, defended the foundation's approach, stating that it would not abandon its NGO status but instead expand its operations with the Civil-Military Coordination Center in southern Israel.
Humanitarian experts warn that the GHF's tactics could be replicated by the Board of Peace, a proposed entity meant to govern Gaza's rebuilding under Trump's 20-point plan. This plan excludes Palestinian voices and ignores previous UN resolutions calling for an end to occupation.
Aid groups are concerned that this model normalizes private logistics and security firms managing humanitarian aid to turn a profit. They fear it could lead to further exploitation of desperate populations in conflict zones across the world.
As the situation in Gaza continues to deteriorate, aid groups are calling on those with influence to support their efforts and protect the integrity of humanitarian work.