Trump Unleashes Plan to "Take Over" Voting, Despite Denials from GOP Leaders
In a recent podcast interview with former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino, President Donald Trump called on Republicans to "nationalize" elections and take control of voting in at least 15 states. While Trump's comments were quickly downplayed by White House officials, the move marks another step in his ongoing efforts to centralize federal control over election administration.
The specifics of this plan are unclear, but it signals a desire for Trump to remove election administration from state hands and impose his own vision on the process. This comes as he continues to make unsubstantiated claims about widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election, despite numerous investigations and court rulings that have found no evidence of such impropriety.
Trump's push for nationalized voting has been met with resistance from GOP leaders, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senator Rand Paul. While they acknowledge the need for some federal oversight, they argue that Congress should not take over administering and running federal elections.
However, Trump's actions outside of Congress demonstrate a clear intent to expand federal control over election administration. He has already taken numerous steps in this direction, including suing at least 24 states for failing to turn over their voter registration lists and requesting data from the Department of Justice on unredacted voter rolls.
Critics argue that these moves are part of an effort to undermine faith and trust in elections by suggesting that states cannot be trusted to run their own affairs. They point out that the Constitution explicitly gives states the power to regulate and administer elections, but also reserves authority for Congress to make or alter such regulations.
Experts say that while Trump's plan is vague, it raises serious concerns about the potential for partisan manipulation and erosion of state sovereignty. As one University of Southern California law professor noted, "It really depends on what nationalizing elections entails."
The move has also sparked criticism from state election officials, who argue that Trump's comments are a thinly veiled attempt to justify federal overreach and undermine the work of local election administrators.
"We have serious concerns about how federal officials want to use private and protected voter information," said Washington Secretary of State Steve Hobbs. "We don't think the President has any authority to do this."
As tensions around voting rights continue to escalate, it remains to be seen whether Trump's push for nationalized elections will gain traction with Congress or if he will be forced to reconsider his approach. One thing is clear: the stakes are high, and the outcome could have far-reaching implications for American democracy.
In a recent podcast interview with former FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino, President Donald Trump called on Republicans to "nationalize" elections and take control of voting in at least 15 states. While Trump's comments were quickly downplayed by White House officials, the move marks another step in his ongoing efforts to centralize federal control over election administration.
The specifics of this plan are unclear, but it signals a desire for Trump to remove election administration from state hands and impose his own vision on the process. This comes as he continues to make unsubstantiated claims about widespread voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election, despite numerous investigations and court rulings that have found no evidence of such impropriety.
Trump's push for nationalized voting has been met with resistance from GOP leaders, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senator Rand Paul. While they acknowledge the need for some federal oversight, they argue that Congress should not take over administering and running federal elections.
However, Trump's actions outside of Congress demonstrate a clear intent to expand federal control over election administration. He has already taken numerous steps in this direction, including suing at least 24 states for failing to turn over their voter registration lists and requesting data from the Department of Justice on unredacted voter rolls.
Critics argue that these moves are part of an effort to undermine faith and trust in elections by suggesting that states cannot be trusted to run their own affairs. They point out that the Constitution explicitly gives states the power to regulate and administer elections, but also reserves authority for Congress to make or alter such regulations.
Experts say that while Trump's plan is vague, it raises serious concerns about the potential for partisan manipulation and erosion of state sovereignty. As one University of Southern California law professor noted, "It really depends on what nationalizing elections entails."
The move has also sparked criticism from state election officials, who argue that Trump's comments are a thinly veiled attempt to justify federal overreach and undermine the work of local election administrators.
"We have serious concerns about how federal officials want to use private and protected voter information," said Washington Secretary of State Steve Hobbs. "We don't think the President has any authority to do this."
As tensions around voting rights continue to escalate, it remains to be seen whether Trump's push for nationalized elections will gain traction with Congress or if he will be forced to reconsider his approach. One thing is clear: the stakes are high, and the outcome could have far-reaching implications for American democracy.