Has Rachel Reeves made the right calls in this budget? Our panel responds | Polly Toynbee and others

I gotta agree with Julia Davies on this one πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. The freezing of income tax thresholds is a big mistake, especially for working-class individuals who can barely make ends meet. It's like they're saying, "Hey, we care about you, but not enough to take from the rich". Come on, if we want to really tackle inequality, we need to start targeting those at the top. A mansion tax would be a great place to start πŸ’Έ. And don't even get me started on Andy Summers' point about ad hoc revenue-grabs - that's just not going to cut it πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. We need a comprehensive plan here, not just band-aids on symptoms. Sarah Nankivell's got some good points about moving green policy costs off household bills, but we need more than just tweaks to get us out of this mess πŸ“‰.
 
I don't know about this new two-child benefit cap thingy... my daughter's been saying she wants a sibling for ages now! πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ I get that it's trying to help low-income families, but isn't the idea of having kids just because you can have more kids kinda the opposite of what they're trying to do? And then there's the minimum wage increase... my son just started a part-time job and he's already feeling the pinch. Hopefully, it'll make a difference for people like him 🀞
 
The recent Labour budget has sparked a nuanced debate among experts, with some hailing it as a significant step towards mitigating poverty and inequality πŸ€”. While measures such as abolishing the two-child benefit cap and increasing the minimum wage are undoubtedly positive, I'm not entirely convinced that they address the underlying structural issues πŸ”’.

The freezing of income tax thresholds is indeed problematic, particularly for working-class individuals who are already struggling to make ends meet πŸ’Έ. However, I'm not convinced that targeting the wealthy is a straightforward solution either – after all, there's no clear evidence that taxing the super-rich would magically solve the problem πŸ€‘.

What concerns me more is the lack of ambition and comprehensive vision in the budget πŸ“ˆ. Council tax reform, while an important step, feels like a tokenistic attempt to placate critics 😐. And let's be real – the government has a history of kicking the can down the road on major reforms πŸ’₯.

Ultimately, I think we need to see more concrete policies and structural changes to address the root causes of inequality πŸ”„. Until then, it feels like we're stuck in a never-ending cycle of ad hoc fixes rather than meaningful reform πŸ”’.
 
I think it's awesome that they're finally making changes to help low-income families 😊. The two-child benefit cap has been a nightmare for so many parents trying to make ends meet. But at the same time, I'm like 'what about the super-rich guys?' πŸ€‘ They're basically getting off scot-free with no tax on their mansions or luxury cars. It's just not fair that they get to accumulate all this wealth while everyone else is struggling. And yeah, council tax reform sounds great in theory but let's be real it's gonna take a lot more than just tweaking the system to make it work for everyone πŸ€”.
 
omg I'm literally so frustrated with this budget lol the thing is they're trying to help low-income fams and young ppl but isn't it just a bandaid on the real issue? like what's gonna happen when we actually tackle poverty and inequality? πŸ€”

I was talking to my friend who's a social worker and she said that abolishing the 2-child benefit cap is only a small step and we need to be addressing the root causes of poverty in our communities. Like, how many ppl have access to affordable housing, healthcare, and education?

and can we pls talk about taxation? like Polly Toynbee makes some good points but I feel like the government's not being aggressive enough. We need a mansion tax ASAP! πŸ’Έ

I'm also kinda disappointed that they're freezing income tax thresholds, it's just gonna make things worse for working-class individuals who are already struggling. And what about green policy costs? moving them off household bills is a good start but we need to do more.

I don't know, maybe I'm just being too optimistic πŸ˜… but I think if the government puts their minds to it they could actually make some real changes that benefit ppl in this country.
 
πŸ˜” I feel like this budget is setting us up for a better future, but it's also kinda sad that we're still struggling so much with inequality πŸ€•. I mean, abolishing the two-child benefit cap and increasing the minimum wage are huge steps forward πŸ‘, but at the same time, I'm really disappointed that it doesn't do more to address the root causes of poverty πŸ’Έ.

I feel like the super-rich are getting away scot-free, and that's just not right πŸ€‘. It's like, come on, government! You can do better than this πŸ˜”. And what about those living in energy poverty? It's so unfair that they're being asked to pay more for something they need to survive πŸ’Έ.

I'm all for a mansion tax, but I guess that would've been too much to ask πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. Still, it's good that the government is trying to do better πŸ’ͺ. We just need more ambition and a bit more courage to take on the tough issues 😊.
 
Back
Top