Hereditary peers aren't out of touch with the realities of the job market | Letter

C

CoreLogic

A recent debate surrounding the role of hereditary peers in the House of Lords has highlighted a concerning lack of understanding about their involvement in shaping policy. Critics claim that these lawmakers are out of touch with the realities of the job market, but this assertion is far from accurate.

The truth is, many hereditary peers have extensive experience in setting up and running businesses, large and small. This experience would suggest they are well-equipped to understand the challenges faced by businesses and individuals alike. In fact, it's the critics – namely, those with no real-world business experience – who may be out of touch.

The unemployment rate has hit 5%, with over 1.7 million people now reliant on benefits. The government's own analysis has revealed that the proposed employment bill will cost businesses a staggering £5 billion annually. It is precisely this kind of practical, real-world knowledge that hereditary peers bring to the table.

Notably, many prominent business organizations, including the Federation of Small Businesses, the CBI, and the Institute of Directors, have backed the Lords' stance on this issue. Even Sir Tony Blair, a former Labour leader, has thrown his weight behind the amendment.

The real question is not who is out of touch, but rather how the government plans to address the pressing issues at hand. By ignoring the concerns of these organizations and dismissing their expertise, it seems the government is more interested in scoring political points than finding genuine solutions.

The fact that fewer than two-thirds of Labour peers supported this bill highlights a worrying trend within the party. It suggests that even those who claim to be champions of workers' rights are not immune to being swayed by ideological interests rather than practical realities.

Ultimately, it is time for the government to listen to the concerns of all stakeholders – not just politicians with a vested interest in passing legislation. By doing so, they may yet avoid stonking defeats and find a way forward that truly benefits British business and its workers.
 
🤔 I mean come on... critics think hereditary peers are out of touch but like what do we know about them? Some of 'em have actually built successful businesses from scratch! That's actual world experience, not just some policy paper nonsense. And don't even get me started on Labour MPs who didn't support the bill... some of 'em are just there for the paycheck 🤑. It's all about politics, not about what's best for the country. The gov needs to listen to experts and stop playing party games 👊
 
Omg, 5% unemployment rate?? 🤯 That's crazy! My friend's cousin's brother is actually struggling to get a job right now... I mean, what can the government do to help? Like, they're already doing so much with £5 billion... that's like, a lot of money! 🤑 Does anyone know how that's going to be used exactly? And btw, why are hereditary peers so underrated? They have business experience and stuff... doesn't that count for something? 😒 Also, what's up with the fact that only 2/3 of Labour peers supported the bill? That sounds like a major party drama... can someone explain it to me? 🤔
 
I think the whole debate around hereditary peers is being blown out of proportion 🤔. These guys have been running businesses for years, so shouldn't their opinion count when it comes to employment laws? It's not like they're just a bunch of old rich dudes who don't care about anyone but themselves... although that might be true in some cases 😒.

Seriously though, the fact that business organizations and even Sir Tony Blair are backing this bill says something. They've got expertise on their side, which is what we need more of in politics – not just ideology. The unemployment rate is still a big issue, and if the government can't work with people who have real-world experience, it's going to be tough to make progress.

It's also interesting that fewer than two-thirds of Labour peers supported this bill... I think that says something about how out of touch some politicians are when it comes to the issues facing ordinary people. We need more voices like these in parliament – not just the ones who can spin a good soundbite or promise the world 🤑.

Anyway, I hope the government takes a step back and listens to what's really going on out there. We don't need more empty promises or grand gestures... we need real solutions that actually make a difference 💸.
 
I don't get why ppl say hereditary peers are outta touch 🤔. I think they're actually pretty useful cuz they've run businesses & seen the ups & downs 📈💸. They know what's gonna hit 'em when it comes to the job market, which is more than most politicians can say 🙃. The gov's got a big problem with this employment bill, but they ain't listening 2 the people who matter most - like business owners 🤝. It's all about politics & scoring points, not finding real solutions 💸. Labour party should b lookin' at their own ppl & seein' if they're bein' swayed by ideology or just listenin' 🤔💬. The gov needs 2 take the concerns of all stakeholders seriously, not just politicians with an agenda 🙏
 
💡 The debate around hereditary peers in the House of Lords is a classic case of politicians getting defensive about their own lack of practical experience 🙄. Meanwhile, businesses are struggling to cope with a 5% unemployment rate & £5 billion annual hit from the proposed employment bill 📉. What's really needed is for the government to listen to the experts, not just those with a vested interest in passing legislation 💬.
 
I dont think the gov is doin enuf 2 address the unemployment probs 🤕. Those hereditary peers got some serious experience under their belts. Like, who else gonna understand whats goin on in the job market? 🤑 The fact thats Labour peeps not supportin the bill is sus too. Shouldn't they be lookin out for workers' rights? 🤷‍♀️ Anyways, lets just hope gov listens 2 both sides & we get some real solutions 🙏
 
I think this debate about hereditary peers is getting totally out of hand 🙄. The whole thing seems like a PR stunt to me. All these big business organizations are backing the Lords on this, but what's the real reason? Is it because they genuinely care about businesses and workers or just because they're trying to make some noise? I mean, come on, £5 billion is a lot of cash 💸. If that's what this bill is going to cost businesses, then surely those in power should be having an open and honest discussion about it instead of just relying on the advice of people who actually know what they're talking about. And btw, has anyone thought about how this would affect startup companies or small business owners? 🤔
 
🤔 I think people are getting it wrong about hereditary peers in the House of Lords. They're not out of touch just 'cause they come from wealthy families, but because we've forgotten what it's like to run a small business or create jobs ourselves 📈💼 It's all about real-world experience and understanding the struggles many people face. The fact that big biz orgs are backing them says a lot about how out of touch politicians can be with actual reality 😒
 
🤔 I'm genuinely surprised by how often we hear people claiming hereditary peers are out of touch with reality. Like, have you seen the stats on unemployed folks? 5% unemployment is no joke! It's like they're trying to forget that there are real-world problems being faced every day. The fact that so many business organizations and even a former Labour leader are backing this bill shows that these people actually get it. They've been around the block a few times, they know how hard it is for businesses to stay afloat.

It's like the government just wants to score points with their own base rather than listening to everyone else. I mean, what's the point of having all those peers if you're not going to use their expertise? They've got experience, they've got knowledge, and they can actually make a difference.

The problem is, it sounds like the party that claims to be for workers' rights isn't even listening to their own people. Like, fewer than two-thirds of Labour peers supported this bill? That's a pretty clear sign that some folks are more interested in ideology than actual solutions. 🤷‍♂️
 
🤔 I mean, come on... 5% unemployment is pretty high, right? 📉 You'd think the government would want to support people who are struggling to make ends meet. But instead of listening to experts like the Federation of Small Businesses and Sir Tony Blair, they're trying to score political points. That's just not right 😒.

I've got a friend who runs a small business, and he's been telling me about how hard it is to find decent staff these days. He says that wages are too low, benefits aren't enough... it's like the government isn't even listening to him! 🤷‍♂️ And now they're proposing a bill that's going to cost businesses £5 billion? That just doesn't add up.

I think we need politicians who actually have experience running real-world businesses. Not just people who are trying to pad their CVs with some fancy title or connection to the party. 📊 We need people who understand what it's like to be on the front line, making decisions that affect actual lives and livelihoods.

The whole thing just seems so... out of touch 😒. Can't we get some sense back into politics? 🤞
 
The gov't's got this whole thing totally backwards 🙄. They're more worried about scoring points than actually fixing the problems. And honestly, who can blame them? The system is all messed up, and it takes a lot of guts to challenge it.

I mean, think about it - these hereditary peers have real-world experience that most politicians don't even dream of having. They know what it's like to run a business, make tough decisions, and deal with the consequences. So why are they getting left out of the conversation? It's time for them to be listened to, IMHO 😊.

The fact that Labour is already getting its feathers ruffled about this amendment just shows how out of touch some of their members are 🤷‍♂️. I mean, if you're not willing to listen to people who actually know what they're talking about, then maybe you shouldn't be in charge of making laws in the first place 💡.

It's all about politics as usual, and that's exactly what we need less of - more focus on finding practical solutions that benefit everyone. 💸
 
omg I had this convo w my biz class prof last sem & we were discussing the unemployment rate 🤯 1.7 mil ppl on benefits is CRAZY! & I was saying how hereditary peers actually have more experience in running businesses than most politicians 🤑 like, who better to understand the struggles of businesses than someone who's been there? it's all about real-world knowledge & not just ideology 💡
 
I think hereditary peers bring some much needed perspective to the House of Lords 🤝. They're not just politicians who have been handed a seat, they've built businesses from scratch and understand what it takes to keep people employed 💼. The government needs to listen to people with real-world experience like this before making decisions that will cost businesses £5 billion annually 📉. It's about time the government stopped being so ideological and started thinking about how their policies affect everyday people 🙏.
 
I think hereditary peers have a right point about this employment bill 🤔... it's kinda scary how much money the government is planning to spend on unemployment and I'm not sure anyone with experience running businesses would agree with throwing £5 billion at it 💸. They know from personal experience that some policies can be super expensive and hard to make work, so its good they're bringing their expertise to the table 🙌. And what's really worrying is if Labour peers are getting swayed by politics over actual help for people... we need all parties listening to the real people and businesses, not just the politicians 💬
 
I'm literally stressing out thinking about this employment bill, like what's going on in the government?? They're basically expecting businesses to take a £5 billion hit without considering how that'll affect the people who need jobs the most 😩💸 I mean, some of these hereditary peers might have business experience but it's not all about them, it's about listening to everyone involved 🤝🏼. And those big business orgs like CBI and Federation of Small Businesses are totally backing the Lords' stance, so maybe we should be listening to them too 🤔💼. It's just so frustrating that politicians are more worried about scoring points than finding real solutions 👎😡
 
I don't get why everyone's going on about the hereditary peers, you know? Like, what's the big deal? They've got experience running businesses, right? That's gotta count for something! 🤔 I mean, I was reading this article yesterday and it said that unemployment's at 5% now, like over a million people are out of work. And this bill's supposed to cost businesses £5 billion a year... what's the point of even having them in the Lords if they're just gonna throw a wobbly? 🤑 I reckon the government's more worried about getting re-elected than actually helping people, you know? 😒
 
I'm getting so frustrated with these debates 😩. Can't we just have a discussion about what's best for the country without all the backstabbing? The idea that hereditary peers are out of touch is just a cop-out 🤷‍♂️. They're not some clueless rich kids playing at politics – they've got real-world experience and business sense. And who are these critics really? Just politicians who don't have to worry about losing their next election 😒.

And another thing, what's with the £5 billion annual cost of the employment bill? Is that even realistic? 🤔 I'm all for finding solutions, but we need to be careful not to just pawn off responsibility on businesses. We should be supporting them, not strapping them down with more regulations 🚫.

The fact that Sir Tony Blair is backing this amendment is pretty telling – he's got experience and expertise, and he's not afraid to speak up 💬. Maybe the gov't should listen to people like him instead of just trying to score points 📊.
 
I don't usually comment but... I think it's crazy how many people assume hereditary peers are all out of touch just because they're rich and stuff 🤑. Like, have you met any of them? Some of them are entrepreneurs, small business owners, or even just regular people who happened to inherit a bunch of money 💸. They actually understand what's going on in the real world. And yeah, it's weird how the gov's more worried about scoring points than figuring out actual problems 🤔.

The thing is, I'm not saying they're perfect and all that. But come on, let's give them some credit where credit is due. They're not just some bunch of toffs in fancy suits; they're people with experience and knowledge. And those who are against the bill? Most of 'em don't have a clue what they're talking about 😂.

It's like, the gov's so caught up in being PC that they forget the actual issues at hand 🙄. The unemployment rate is through the roof, and yet they're more concerned with scoring points than finding solutions 💸. Let's get some real-world expertise into that House of Lords already! 👊
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top