US President Donald Trump's foreign policy stance towards Africa is increasingly being shaped by Christian nationalism, which has led to protection being withdrawn from immigrants facing violence and instability in Nigeria and South Sudan.
Following a recent threat to deploy military action in Nigeria over claims that Christians were being persecuted, the Trump administration has instead ended temporary protected status for Afrikaners who are fleeing violence and persecution in South Africa. Despite this decision, experts argue that it serves as part of a broader white Christian nationalist strategy to shape US immigration policy.
The narrative surrounding Afrikaner refugees is deeply rooted in a flawed understanding of their cultural identity. According to Professor Stephen Lloyd, "Afrikaners often feel themselves to be a tribe in the way that the Zulu or the Xhosa people are a tribe. And so there is still that sort of national sentiment that you look out for each other, you try to care for each other's political future."
However, this narrative does not hold up when examining the facts on the ground. In Nigeria, while Christians have undoubtedly faced violence from militant groups like Boko Haram, they are by no means the exclusive target of attacks. Research has shown that around 50% of attacks targeted Christians in Nigeria last year, and Christians from other faiths also suffer.
Similarly, the claim that Afrikaners are being persecuted in South Africa does not match up with reality. Despite Trump's claims that white Christians are facing genocide, this narrative appears to be motivated by a desire to drum up concerns over immigration, rather than any genuine attempt to protect these groups.
Experts believe that Trump's strategy feeds into his base's fears of immigration and demographic change, positioning the president as a defender of Christian values. By framing these complex scenarios in terms of a genocide of white people or Christians, the narrative allows Trump not only to drum up concerns over immigrants but also motivates his base to support him out of that fear.
Ultimately, this policy decision appears to be an example of how Christian nationalism is shaping US foreign policy towards Africa, and highlights the need for greater scrutiny of these narratives as they unfold.
Following a recent threat to deploy military action in Nigeria over claims that Christians were being persecuted, the Trump administration has instead ended temporary protected status for Afrikaners who are fleeing violence and persecution in South Africa. Despite this decision, experts argue that it serves as part of a broader white Christian nationalist strategy to shape US immigration policy.
The narrative surrounding Afrikaner refugees is deeply rooted in a flawed understanding of their cultural identity. According to Professor Stephen Lloyd, "Afrikaners often feel themselves to be a tribe in the way that the Zulu or the Xhosa people are a tribe. And so there is still that sort of national sentiment that you look out for each other, you try to care for each other's political future."
However, this narrative does not hold up when examining the facts on the ground. In Nigeria, while Christians have undoubtedly faced violence from militant groups like Boko Haram, they are by no means the exclusive target of attacks. Research has shown that around 50% of attacks targeted Christians in Nigeria last year, and Christians from other faiths also suffer.
Similarly, the claim that Afrikaners are being persecuted in South Africa does not match up with reality. Despite Trump's claims that white Christians are facing genocide, this narrative appears to be motivated by a desire to drum up concerns over immigration, rather than any genuine attempt to protect these groups.
Experts believe that Trump's strategy feeds into his base's fears of immigration and demographic change, positioning the president as a defender of Christian values. By framing these complex scenarios in terms of a genocide of white people or Christians, the narrative allows Trump not only to drum up concerns over immigrants but also motivates his base to support him out of that fear.
Ultimately, this policy decision appears to be an example of how Christian nationalism is shaping US foreign policy towards Africa, and highlights the need for greater scrutiny of these narratives as they unfold.