'I can see a world where Spotify doesn't exist': will a new generation of music streaming companies succeed?

๐ŸŽถ can't say I'm surprised, man, Spotify's always been all about the algorithm ๐Ÿค– and treating artists like, well, assets ๐Ÿ’ธ. but these new platforms, like Nina Protocol and Cantilever, are really showing that there's a better way to do things. I mean, using expert curators to select albums is a total game-changer ๐Ÿ“š. it's all about the music now, not just what Spotify thinks you'll listen to next ๐Ÿ”„. and the fact that these platforms prioritize artist welfare is a huge win for creatives ๐Ÿ™Œ. we're talking 100% royalties from downloads? that's like, totally fair ๐Ÿ’ฏ. can't wait to see how this all plays out in the future ๐Ÿ”ฎ
 
Im not sure about this whole new gen of music streaming platforms trying to challenge Spotify... sounds like just another hype ๐Ÿค”. cantilever and Nina Protocol might have some good points with their curatorial approach, but how do we know its not just a fancy way to keep users engaged longer? ๐Ÿค‘ also, 100% revenue for artists on Nina Protocol seems too good to be true - what's the catch? want some concrete data or evidence before getting all excited about this "hope" for a more artist-friendly industry ๐Ÿ“Š.
 
Spotify's been getting all this flack about treating artists poorly? Like, yeah, I get it. They're not exactly the most artist-friendly company out there ๐Ÿค‘. But new kids on the block like Nina Protocol and Cantilever are showing us that we can do better. It's about time someone stood up for those creatives and gave 'em a fair shake ๐Ÿ’ธ.

I mean, Spotify's all about algorithms and playlists and whatnot, but these newcomers are taking a more human approach ๐Ÿค. They're curating content with experts who actually know what they're talking about, not just some fancy algorithm that's gonna spit out whatever's trendy at the moment. And let's be real, those endless playlists can be super overwhelming ๐Ÿ˜ด.

I'm all for giving artists more control over their work and making sure they get paid fairly ๐Ÿ’ธ. It's not like it's rocket science or anything. We just need to stop supporting companies that don't have our best interests at heart ๐Ÿ™„. So yeah, I'm hyped about these new platforms and the direction they're taking the industry in ๐Ÿ‘
 
idk about all this ๐Ÿค” i mean, cantilever's approach to curating content sounds cool, but isn't that just gonna be a bunch of critics' picks? wouldn't that limit the whole "discovery" thing that spotify does so well? and what about these new platforms charging artists a fee to join their network? isn't that just gonna price out all the smaller acts who can't afford it? ๐Ÿค‘ i guess my brain's having a major identity crisis - on one hand, i love the idea of more control for users & artists, but on the other, i'm worried about all these new platforms just being another example of spotify's business model... ๐Ÿคฏ
 
I think its crazy how many ppl are leaving spotify for these new platforms ๐Ÿคฏ I mean, who needs algorithms telling u what music to listen to when u can have some expert curators doin the dirty work? ๐Ÿ˜‚ Cantilever's approach sounds so much more chill, like they're actually lookin at what makes music meaningful, rather than just pumpin out playlists for clicks.

And artist welfare is a huge deal! I mean, its not right that they gotta fight for fair compensation on major platforms. Nina Protocol's open public network is genius ๐Ÿคฉ Artists can set their own terms and keep all the cash? That's like music heaven right there.

Its also cool to see ppl demand more control over their streaming habits ๐Ÿ“Š Spotify's been criticized before, but its clear now that ppl are onto somethin' better. And if Nina Protocol's CEO is sayin "I can see a world where spotify doesn't exist in the future"... then thats definitely somethin we should be lookin forward to ๐ŸŒŽ
 
Back
Top