US Defence Secretary Hegseth Accused of Using Signal Messaging App to Share Sensitive Info
A scathing Inspector General report has raised significant concerns about US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's use of the messaging app Signal, which allegedly put a top-secret military operation at risk. According to anonymous sources familiar with the document, Hegseth used his personal device to transmit sensitive information, violating Pentagon policy.
The controversy began in late March when The Atlantic magazine editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg received an invitation to join a Signal chat, supposedly sent by then-national security adviser Mike Waltz. Although Goldberg was unsure if the message was legitimate, he accepted the invitation and found himself caught up in a conversation involving senior Trump administration officials, including Hegseth.
The discussion reportedly revealed sensitive details about a March 15 attack on Houthi rebels in Yemen, including the timing of F-18 plane launches and drone arrivals. Critics have expressed outrage over the risks posed by the messages, fearing that they could have endangered service members' lives if intercepted by foreign intelligence operatives.
Despite the allegations, the Inspector General's report has declined to determine whether the information Hegseth transmitted was classified at the time. However, it recommends greater training for officials to ensure compliance with operational security standards.
Defence Secretary Hegseth has denied sharing "war plans" over Signal and called the controversy a "witch-hunt." Administration officials have repeatedly pushed for the scandal, dubbed Signalgate, to be closed. Despite this, critics, including Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer, have demanded an investigation into Hegseth's actions.
The Pentagon's acting Inspector General has launched a probe into the matter, citing concerns over compliance with classification and records retention requirements. This move comes amid a broader purge of government watchdogs during Trump's presidency, which has raised questions about the independence of oversight agencies.
A scathing Inspector General report has raised significant concerns about US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth's use of the messaging app Signal, which allegedly put a top-secret military operation at risk. According to anonymous sources familiar with the document, Hegseth used his personal device to transmit sensitive information, violating Pentagon policy.
The controversy began in late March when The Atlantic magazine editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg received an invitation to join a Signal chat, supposedly sent by then-national security adviser Mike Waltz. Although Goldberg was unsure if the message was legitimate, he accepted the invitation and found himself caught up in a conversation involving senior Trump administration officials, including Hegseth.
The discussion reportedly revealed sensitive details about a March 15 attack on Houthi rebels in Yemen, including the timing of F-18 plane launches and drone arrivals. Critics have expressed outrage over the risks posed by the messages, fearing that they could have endangered service members' lives if intercepted by foreign intelligence operatives.
Despite the allegations, the Inspector General's report has declined to determine whether the information Hegseth transmitted was classified at the time. However, it recommends greater training for officials to ensure compliance with operational security standards.
Defence Secretary Hegseth has denied sharing "war plans" over Signal and called the controversy a "witch-hunt." Administration officials have repeatedly pushed for the scandal, dubbed Signalgate, to be closed. Despite this, critics, including Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer, have demanded an investigation into Hegseth's actions.
The Pentagon's acting Inspector General has launched a probe into the matter, citing concerns over compliance with classification and records retention requirements. This move comes amid a broader purge of government watchdogs during Trump's presidency, which has raised questions about the independence of oversight agencies.