Iran's internet shutdown has entered its 36th hour, with no signs of letting up, as authorities continue to quell escalating anti-government protests. The blackout, which blocks an astonishing 90% of internet traffic, is being characterized by experts as "unprecedented" and "far harsher than previous digital blackouts in the country."
The shutdown's sophistication and severity have been likened to a "new high-water mark," with Iranian digital rights expert Amir Rashidi describing it as "like living in the middle of nowhere, with no BTS towers" β a stark contrast to the limited connectivity Iranians once enjoyed. Even Elon Musk's Starlink satellite system was jammed during this period, rendering even the lifeline internet services ineffective.
What sets this blackout apart from previous instances is its fine-tuned precision and what appears to be a more permanent solution for the authorities. According to Doug Madory, an expert in internet infrastructure, "this might be for the long haul."
The shutdown's implications extend beyond mere communication; it also stifles access to essential information and social media platforms, where Iranians rely on these platforms to voice their dissent. The fact that Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, continued to post updates online despite the blackout underscores the regime's reliance on internet connectivity for propaganda purposes.
This raises questions about the effectiveness of such measures in curtailing dissent and maintaining control. As Madory noted, "there are big costs to taking everything down." The Iranian government's attempts to fine-tune its censorship tools suggest a desire to prolong this blackout, potentially rendering it a defining feature of their response to ongoing protests.
The implications of Iran's internet shutdown also resonate beyond the country's borders, as other nations grapple with similar issues. India is developing its own state-managed messaging app, while Russia pushes for a "super app" model akin to China's WeChat. However, for now, it appears that Iran's approach remains uniquely severe and restrictive.
The shutdown's sophistication and severity have been likened to a "new high-water mark," with Iranian digital rights expert Amir Rashidi describing it as "like living in the middle of nowhere, with no BTS towers" β a stark contrast to the limited connectivity Iranians once enjoyed. Even Elon Musk's Starlink satellite system was jammed during this period, rendering even the lifeline internet services ineffective.
What sets this blackout apart from previous instances is its fine-tuned precision and what appears to be a more permanent solution for the authorities. According to Doug Madory, an expert in internet infrastructure, "this might be for the long haul."
The shutdown's implications extend beyond mere communication; it also stifles access to essential information and social media platforms, where Iranians rely on these platforms to voice their dissent. The fact that Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, continued to post updates online despite the blackout underscores the regime's reliance on internet connectivity for propaganda purposes.
This raises questions about the effectiveness of such measures in curtailing dissent and maintaining control. As Madory noted, "there are big costs to taking everything down." The Iranian government's attempts to fine-tune its censorship tools suggest a desire to prolong this blackout, potentially rendering it a defining feature of their response to ongoing protests.
The implications of Iran's internet shutdown also resonate beyond the country's borders, as other nations grapple with similar issues. India is developing its own state-managed messaging app, while Russia pushes for a "super app" model akin to China's WeChat. However, for now, it appears that Iran's approach remains uniquely severe and restrictive.