Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration's Immigrant Arrests Without Warrants or Probable Cause in DC
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration's plan to make widespread immigration arrests in Washington D.C. without warrants or probable cause, dealing a significant blow to the administration's efforts to crack down on undocumented immigrants.
The ruling, issued by US District Judge Beryl Howell, grants a preliminary injunction sought by civil liberties and immigrant rights groups who sued the US Department of Homeland Security over the policy. The lawsuit alleged that since Donald Trump declared an emergency in Washington in August, there has been a pattern of widespread, unlawful immigration arrests in the city.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and other plaintiffs' attorneys argued that federal officers were frequently patrolling neighborhoods with large numbers of Latino immigrants and then stopping and arresting people indiscriminately. They cited public statements by administration officials that suggested the administration was not using the probable cause standard for warrantless arrests.
The judge's ruling establishes that federal officers must have an administrative warrant to make civil immigration arrests, except in cases where they have probable cause to believe a person is in the US illegally and is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained. The order also requires any agent who conducts a warrantless arrest to document the specific facts that supported their pre-arrest decision.
The ruling is seen as a victory for immigrant rights groups, who had been living in fear of being stopped by immigration enforcement agents while going about their daily lives. Ama Frimpong, the legal director of Maryland-based immigrant advocacy organization Casa, said the ruling gives hope to community members who had been afraid to conduct their daily activities without fear of being arrested.
However, Frimpong also acknowledged that it may take time for community members to regain trust and confidence in the safety of their neighborhoods. "It's been three, four months of just fear that we have been living with in the city," she said. "I don't think change is going to happen overnight."
The ruling is similar to two other federal lawsuits involving the ACLU, one in Colorado and another in California. However, it marks a significant shift in the administration's approach to immigration enforcement in Washington D.C., where community members had been living under fear of widespread arrests without warrants or probable cause.
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration's plan to make widespread immigration arrests in Washington D.C. without warrants or probable cause, dealing a significant blow to the administration's efforts to crack down on undocumented immigrants.
The ruling, issued by US District Judge Beryl Howell, grants a preliminary injunction sought by civil liberties and immigrant rights groups who sued the US Department of Homeland Security over the policy. The lawsuit alleged that since Donald Trump declared an emergency in Washington in August, there has been a pattern of widespread, unlawful immigration arrests in the city.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and other plaintiffs' attorneys argued that federal officers were frequently patrolling neighborhoods with large numbers of Latino immigrants and then stopping and arresting people indiscriminately. They cited public statements by administration officials that suggested the administration was not using the probable cause standard for warrantless arrests.
The judge's ruling establishes that federal officers must have an administrative warrant to make civil immigration arrests, except in cases where they have probable cause to believe a person is in the US illegally and is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained. The order also requires any agent who conducts a warrantless arrest to document the specific facts that supported their pre-arrest decision.
The ruling is seen as a victory for immigrant rights groups, who had been living in fear of being stopped by immigration enforcement agents while going about their daily lives. Ama Frimpong, the legal director of Maryland-based immigrant advocacy organization Casa, said the ruling gives hope to community members who had been afraid to conduct their daily activities without fear of being arrested.
However, Frimpong also acknowledged that it may take time for community members to regain trust and confidence in the safety of their neighborhoods. "It's been three, four months of just fear that we have been living with in the city," she said. "I don't think change is going to happen overnight."
The ruling is similar to two other federal lawsuits involving the ACLU, one in Colorado and another in California. However, it marks a significant shift in the administration's approach to immigration enforcement in Washington D.C., where community members had been living under fear of widespread arrests without warrants or probable cause.