Judge tosses indictments against James Comey and Letitia James

Federal Judge Dismisses Indictments Against James Comey and Letitia James Over Trump's Appointment Power

A US federal judge has dismissed the criminal cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James, ruling that the appointment of the U.S. attorney who brought the indictments was invalid. The decision came after a lengthy legal battle over President Donald Trump's influence on the appointment process.

Judge Cameron McGowan Currie concluded that Lindsey Halligan, the interim US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, had no lawful authority to present the indictment, as her appointment was not valid under federal law. This means that the charges against Comey and James can be refiled by an appropriately appointed U.S. attorney.

The indictment against Comey centered on allegations that he made false statements during a Senate hearing in 2020. The case against James relates to mortgage fraud charges stemming from a property purchase in 2020.

Halligan, who was handpicked by Trump as interim US Attorney, had no experience as a prosecutor and was criticized for her lack of qualifications. Her appointment was also deemed unconstitutional by Judge Currie.

This decision comes after President Biden's pick for US Attorney, Jessica Aber, resigned, allowing the judges in the Eastern District of Virginia to appoint Erik Siebert as interim US Attorney. However, Trump later nominated Lindsey Halligan as interim US Attorney, which sparked controversy over her lack of qualifications.

Judge Currie ruled that the appointment power had shifted from the attorney general to the judges in the district after 120 days, and thus Halligan's appointment was invalid. The judge stated that allowing the government to appoint any private citizen as a prosecutor "cannot be the law."

The implications of this decision are significant, as it sets a precedent for presidential influence on the judiciary and highlights concerns over politicization of the justice system.

Comey's attorney, Patrick Fitzgerald, welcomed the ruling, stating that it vindicated the rule of law and protected Comey from what he described as "unlawful prosecution." James' attorney also expressed confidence in her client's case, saying they would challenge any further "politically motivated charges" through every available legal means.

The decision may have limited options for refiled cases against the two politicians.
 
Ugh, can you believe this? Another example of how our system is just too darn complicated ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿ˜ฉ The whole thing with Lindsey Halligan's appointment just sounds like a mess to me... I mean, who picks someone as interim US Attorney without any experience in law? It's like Trump thought he could just play some kind of game here. And now that the judge has ruled her out, I guess Comey and Letitia James are pretty much back in the clear ๐Ÿ™Œ But still, it's all about the politics and who gets to pull the strings... sometimes I wish we had a simpler system where people didn't get to just pick their own prosecutors ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
man this ruling is a huge win for transparency and accountability in our justice system ๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿป๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ it's crazy to think that someone who was basically a political appointee had so much influence over a major prosecutor like Lindsey Halligan...like what even is the point of having an attorney general if they can just let Trump handpick whoever he wants? ๐Ÿ˜’ it's gonna be super interesting to see how this plays out in terms of Comey and James' cases getting refiled, or if they'll end up with some sketchy "new" prosecutor who's also beholden to the whims of the president ๐Ÿค”
 
This is wild, right? ๐Ÿคฏ I mean, who knew that a federal judge could just declare someone's appointment invalid? It's like a game of judicial Twister โ€“ you gotta know which one to grab onto or everything falls apart! ๐Ÿ˜‚ The whole thing with Lindsey Halligan and her lack of experience as a prosecutor is cringeworthy. Like, come on, Donald Trump, did you really think you could just handpick someone and make them a prosecutor? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

And what's up with this whole politicization of the justice system thing? I mean, I get it, it's a big deal, but can't we just have some semblance of fairness here? It feels like Trump is trying to rewrite the rules as he goes along. That's not how democracy works, folks! ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ

Anyway, I guess this decision might give James Comey and Letitia James a bit more breathing room, but it's also gonna be interesting to see how they play out their cases now that Lindsey Halligan is off the table. It's like a game of chess โ€“ we just don't know what's gonna happen next! ๐ŸŽฒ
 
omg can't believe this is happening ๐Ÿคฏ https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...omey-and-james-over-trump-s-appointment-power

comey and james should've known better than to mess with trump's buddies ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ he's always finding ways to screw the system

anyway, this ruling is a big deal for the judiciary and it shows that even presidents can't just do whatever they want ๐Ÿšซ gotta keep those in power accountable

can someone explain how this all went down? like, who gave halligan the job and why? ๐Ÿ’”

edit: just read about how aber resigned because of controversy over her appointment lol guess that's what happens when you mess with the system
 
๐Ÿ˜ฌ๐Ÿคฏ So basically Trump's attempts to pack the justice system with his buddies are getting shot down ๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ’ช. It's about time someone held him accountable for trying to politicize the judiciary ๐Ÿ™„. The fact that Lindsey Halligan, a total newbie, was handpicked by Trump and didn't have any qualifications is just ridiculous ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™€๏ธ. I'm glad Patrick Fitzgerald is pushing back on this and vouching for James' case ๐Ÿ‘Š. This ruling is a big deal because it sets a precedent for the president's influence on the judiciary ๐Ÿ’ฅ. It's all about maintaining the integrity of our justice system and making sure everyone plays by the same rules ๐Ÿค.
 
This ruling is a big win for accountability, you feel me? ๐Ÿค” Like, Trump was trying to stack the deck with his interim pick, Lindsey Halligan, and it just didn't fly. The judge was clear that her appointment was invalid because of how it happened. It's like, no way can a private citizen just waltz in and take over as prosecutor without going through the proper channels. This sets a bad precedent if we're not careful, but for now, it's a win for the rule of law. Let's hope it doesn't get watered down ๐Ÿคž
 
๐Ÿค” This ruling is a huge deal, I'm not surprised though - Trump's always been trying to bend the rules to his advantage ๐Ÿ™„. The whole thing feels like a classic case of power abuse... it's just too convenient that Halligan had no qualifications for the job ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ and got appointed in such a short time frame. It's also worrying that judges have to intervene like this, shouldn't they be above all this politics?! ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
I'm loving how this whole thing is playing out ๐Ÿคฏ. I mean, can you imagine if Trump had gotten away with just handing out who he wanted to be prosecutors? It's like, no thanks! The fact that a judge finally stepped in and said "nope, not gonna let you do that" is huge for the rule of law, man ๐Ÿ’ช. And now we get to see what happens when the cases are refiled - I'm keeping an eye on it ๐Ÿค”. One thing's for sure, though: this whole thing just goes to show how important it is to have checks and balances in place to prevent politicians from trying to muscle in on the judiciary ๐Ÿ“š.
 
๐Ÿค” this is a huge deal and it's crazy how politicization of the judiciary can play out like this ๐Ÿ™„. I mean, who gets to just hand-pick some random lawyer as interim US Attorney and expect them to go after someone like Comey? It's not right. And now that Lindsey Halligan's appointment has been ruled invalid, I'm curious to see how this all plays out for Letitia James' case... was she really in over her head trying to take on the mortgage fraud charges? ๐Ÿค‘
 
๐Ÿค” this whole thing is wild... like, Trump tried to handpick some random dude as a prosecutor and then got called out for it? ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ it's not exactly surprising that the judge ruled against it, but still. The implications of this decision are big, especially since it sets a precedent for presidential power over the judiciary. It feels like we're seeing more and more of these kinds of cases where politicians are trying to exert control over the justice system, which is just not how it's supposed to work ๐Ÿ™„.
 
๐Ÿคฏ I'm low-key relieved that justice is being served here! ๐Ÿ˜… I mean, can you imagine if Trump was able to just hand-pick any private citizen as a prosecutor? ๐Ÿ™„ That's like, totally un-American! The fact that the judge ruled it invalid is, like, super important for setting a precedent. We need to make sure our justice system isn't being politicized all the time. ๐Ÿ’ฏ I'm also kinda curious to see how this plays out with James' case - will she still be able to refile? ๐Ÿค”
 
lolol what a surprise that Trump's crony made a mess of it ๐Ÿ™„ like, didn't we learn from his last stint as head honcho? Anyway, gotta give props to Judge Currie for having some serious guts - I mean, taking on the big cheese himself over a little thing like appointment power ๐Ÿ’ช. Now, can someone please explain why the government still can't seem to get its act together when it comes to prosecution and justice? Like, isn't that what we pay our judges to figure out? ๐Ÿค”
 
This ruling is a major blow to Trump's attempts to exert influence over the judiciary ๐Ÿ™Œ. The fact that Judge Currie deemed Halligan's appointment invalid is a significant setback, as it highlights the importance of checks and balances in our system of government ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ. It's also worth noting that this decision sets a precedent for the politicization of the justice system, which could have far-reaching consequences if not addressed ๐Ÿšจ. The fact that Comey's attorney described the ruling as "vindication" for the rule of law is telling, and it suggests that the impact of this decision will be felt by both Comey and James ๐Ÿ‘€.
 
๐Ÿค” The recent ruling by Judge Currie is a significant development in the ongoing debate about presidential influence on the judiciary. The dismissal of indictments against James Comey and Letitia James highlights the importance of maintaining the independence of the justice system, particularly in the face of political pressure.

The fact that Lindsey Halligan's appointment as interim US Attorney was deemed invalid due to her lack of qualifications is a stark reminder of the need for accountability in the appointment process. The shifting of authority from the attorney general to the judges in the district after 120 days also underscores the limitations of presidential power and the importance of judicial oversight.

While this decision may limit options for refiled cases, it also sets an important precedent for future prosecutions and serves as a reminder that the rule of law must be upheld. The implications of this ruling will likely be far-reaching, particularly in the context of ongoing investigations into presidential conduct.

In any case, it's reassuring to know that there are still mechanisms in place to ensure that justice is served and that no individual is above the law. ๐Ÿ’ก
 
I don't usually comment but...this whole thing is kinda wild ๐Ÿคฏ. I mean, you've got a judge dismissing indictments against high-profile figures like Comey and James just because of some technicality about Trump's appointment power? It sounds like a lot of politicking going on behind the scenes ๐Ÿ˜’. And what's up with this Lindsey Halligan lady being appointed as US Attorney without any qualifications? Like, come on ๐Ÿ™„. Anyway, I guess it shows that even in the justice system, there are still checks and balances to prevent politics from getting out of hand ๐Ÿ’ผ.
 
omg i cant even rn ๐Ÿคฏ this is huge!!! so like a federal judge just threw out the indictments againt james comey and letitia james cuz of trump's "influence" on who gets appointed as us attorney ๐Ÿ™„ it's literally like he was trying to stack the deck against them. and get this, the judge said halligans appointment was invalid cuz she had no experience at all ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™€๏ธ like what even is that? anyway i guess comey and james can refile their cases but idk if they'll actually be able to do anything about it ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
omg this is wild ๐Ÿคฏ, like can't believe a judge actually went thru all that to say trumps influence on judges appointments isn't legit lol what's next? ๐Ÿค” are we gonna see more of these cases come up? i think its really shady how halligan was just picked by trump with no experience and then got the power to bring indictments against important ppl.
 
๐Ÿค” This is a big win for the rule of law! I'm loving how the judge called out Trump's attempt to appoint someone with no experience as a prosecutor ๐Ÿ™„ and basically said that can't be legit. It's like, come on, Mr President! You can't just handpick someone to be in charge of investigating your buddies ๐Ÿ˜‚. The fact that this decision sets a precedent for future cases is super concerning tho - it means we might see more politicians trying to game the system ๐Ÿคฅ. Anyway, I'm all about vindicating the rule of law here ๐Ÿ‘ and hopefully this sends a message that no one's above the law (except maybe the President, amirite ๐Ÿ˜‰). This ruling feels like a major victory for accountability! ๐Ÿ’ช
 
๐Ÿค” I'm not surprised to hear that a federal judge dismissed the indictments against James Comey and Letitia James. It's been pretty clear that Trump's involvement in their appointments was shady at best ๐Ÿ™„. I mean, Lindsey Halligan had zero experience as a prosecutor, but somehow Trump made her interim US Attorney anyway! ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ The fact that she didn't have lawful authority to present the indictment is just common sense ๐Ÿ“š.

This decision sets a huge precedent for presidential influence on the judiciary and highlights concerns over politicization of the justice system. It's like, come on guys, can we keep our politics out of the law? ๐Ÿ˜ฉ I'm glad Comey's attorney welcomed the ruling, it shows that they're standing up for the rule of law too ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ. Now let's see how James' team plans to refile their case and challenge any further "politically motivated charges"... fingers crossed! ๐Ÿคž
 
Back
Top