Illinois Seeks To Keep Bears in State with $895 Million Plan
A bid by the Chicago Bears to relocate from their current stadium in Indiana has set off a heated debate among Illinois lawmakers, who are considering a plan to keep the team in the state. The proposed scheme involves providing up to $895 million in capital funding for various infrastructure projects and improvements in Arlington Heights, with no direct funds allocated towards building a new stadium or its surrounding commercial district.
The plan's supporters argue that these enhancements will enhance the area, while critics point out that the majority of the funds will likely be used for construction and maintenance purposes. Politically, Illinois lawmakers are keen to avoid giving the billionaire Bears ownership a taxpayer-funded stadium, as it would undermine their efforts to justify the expense.
A recent move by Indiana Senate committee has added pressure on Illinois lawmakers, with the bill allowing for the relocation of the team without minority and women's contract goals and protections. The proposal also relies on local sales taxes and other revenues to finance the construction funding.
While some lawmakers are warming up to the idea, others remain cautious, citing concerns over potential tax increases and revenue disparities between different regions of Indiana. The legislative calendars in both states may play a significant role in determining the fate of this proposal.
The Illinois House Speaker has indicated that they will not push forward with any plans until after the March primary, but it remains to be seen whether they can muster enough support for their efforts. Meanwhile, the Bears' ownership has expressed interest in the proposed payment-in-lieu-of-taxes bill, which would allow them to secure annual payments from local governments.
Ultimately, it appears that motion and actual movement are two different things in this high-stakes game of sports politics.
A bid by the Chicago Bears to relocate from their current stadium in Indiana has set off a heated debate among Illinois lawmakers, who are considering a plan to keep the team in the state. The proposed scheme involves providing up to $895 million in capital funding for various infrastructure projects and improvements in Arlington Heights, with no direct funds allocated towards building a new stadium or its surrounding commercial district.
The plan's supporters argue that these enhancements will enhance the area, while critics point out that the majority of the funds will likely be used for construction and maintenance purposes. Politically, Illinois lawmakers are keen to avoid giving the billionaire Bears ownership a taxpayer-funded stadium, as it would undermine their efforts to justify the expense.
A recent move by Indiana Senate committee has added pressure on Illinois lawmakers, with the bill allowing for the relocation of the team without minority and women's contract goals and protections. The proposal also relies on local sales taxes and other revenues to finance the construction funding.
While some lawmakers are warming up to the idea, others remain cautious, citing concerns over potential tax increases and revenue disparities between different regions of Indiana. The legislative calendars in both states may play a significant role in determining the fate of this proposal.
The Illinois House Speaker has indicated that they will not push forward with any plans until after the March primary, but it remains to be seen whether they can muster enough support for their efforts. Meanwhile, the Bears' ownership has expressed interest in the proposed payment-in-lieu-of-taxes bill, which would allow them to secure annual payments from local governments.
Ultimately, it appears that motion and actual movement are two different things in this high-stakes game of sports politics.