FDA's top drug regulator, Richard Pazdur, Quits Just Three Weeks After Taking Job Amid Criticism and Tensions.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has lost its lead agency for regulating prescription drugs just three weeks into the new role after an extremely tumultuous tenure. The decision of Richard Pazdur to leave his position comes amid a multitude of issues including allegations of petty revenge, public health risks, and accusations of erratic behavior by former officials.
Pazdur, who took over as head of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research in late November, was seen as a stabilizing force during the chaotic Trump administration's final stretch. However, his tenure quickly turned sour after he expressed deep concerns about FDA Commissioner Marty Makary's plans to overhaul agency operations, citing significant public health risks.
According to multiple sources, Pazdur took issue with Makary's proposal to shorten the length of time spent reviewing labels for pharmaceuticals, which could have serious implications for patients. Additionally, Pazdur disputed the commissioner's decision to reduce the number of studies needed before making decisions related to medication labeling changes.
These disagreements between Pazdur and Makary were seen as a significant blow to the agency's credibility by industry representatives and patient advocacy groups. One prominent venture capital investor described the FDA as a "clown show" due to the instability caused by internal power struggles and controversy surrounding former officials.
Pazdur's abrupt decision to leave his position, reportedly filed with paperwork to retire in late December, has left many feeling sad for the loss of guidance from an agency insider who was well-respected by peers across the pharmaceutical industry. Ellen Sigal, chairperson of Friends of Cancer Research, expressed profound sadness at Pazdur's departure, calling him "our guiding light" and labeling his loss as "profound."
It remains to be seen how this sudden change will impact the FDA's operations and its ability to effectively regulate the pharmaceutical sector.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has lost its lead agency for regulating prescription drugs just three weeks into the new role after an extremely tumultuous tenure. The decision of Richard Pazdur to leave his position comes amid a multitude of issues including allegations of petty revenge, public health risks, and accusations of erratic behavior by former officials.
Pazdur, who took over as head of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research in late November, was seen as a stabilizing force during the chaotic Trump administration's final stretch. However, his tenure quickly turned sour after he expressed deep concerns about FDA Commissioner Marty Makary's plans to overhaul agency operations, citing significant public health risks.
According to multiple sources, Pazdur took issue with Makary's proposal to shorten the length of time spent reviewing labels for pharmaceuticals, which could have serious implications for patients. Additionally, Pazdur disputed the commissioner's decision to reduce the number of studies needed before making decisions related to medication labeling changes.
These disagreements between Pazdur and Makary were seen as a significant blow to the agency's credibility by industry representatives and patient advocacy groups. One prominent venture capital investor described the FDA as a "clown show" due to the instability caused by internal power struggles and controversy surrounding former officials.
Pazdur's abrupt decision to leave his position, reportedly filed with paperwork to retire in late December, has left many feeling sad for the loss of guidance from an agency insider who was well-respected by peers across the pharmaceutical industry. Ellen Sigal, chairperson of Friends of Cancer Research, expressed profound sadness at Pazdur's departure, calling him "our guiding light" and labeling his loss as "profound."
It remains to be seen how this sudden change will impact the FDA's operations and its ability to effectively regulate the pharmaceutical sector.