man... $30 billion for a rocket that can't even launch without leaking liquid hydrogen 
like what's going on with NASA? they're playing with fire here, literally 
. I get it, the SLS rocket is complex and needs testing, but 15 years in and still struggling? that's just sad 
. they should've built those test tanks or used more frequent flights by now... like, what's the hold up? 
Jared Isaacman says the rocket is "dead hardware walking" 
, yeah no kidding 
. SpaceX and Blue Origin are already ahead of them with their Starship and New Glenn vehicles, so it'll be interesting to see how this all plays out 
...
like what's going on with NASA? they're playing with fire here, literally . I get it, the SLS rocket is complex and needs testing, but 15 years in and still struggling? that's just sad . they should've built those test tanks or used more frequent flights by now... like, what's the hold up? Jared Isaacman says the rocket is "dead hardware walking" , yeah no kidding . SpaceX and Blue Origin are already ahead of them with their Starship and New Glenn vehicles, so it'll be interesting to see how this all plays out ...
. i mean, who needs to launch a rocket on time when you can just leak liquid hydrogen all over the place 
. seriously though, it's crazy how much of a safety concern this is. i'm not surprised the admin is only now acknowledging the problem, like they've been trying to sweep it under the rug 
.