Europe's relationship with China is becoming increasingly one-sided. The Dutch government's decision last September to seize Nexperia, a Chinese-owned chip factory, sent shockwaves through the European car industry, highlighting the vulnerabilities of Europe's reliance on Chinese suppliers.
In a bid to ease tensions, Beijing agreed to relax restrictions on automotive chip supplies to the EU, but the move was not without strings attached. The 12-month supply deal comes with a hefty price tag – Nexperia will only supply chips for civilian use, leaving the door open for future intervention in the EU's defense industry.
China is taking a deliberate approach in weaponizing its trading relationships with Europe. By choking off supplies of critical components like magnets and rare earths, Beijing can exert significant economic pressure on European industries. The risks to Europe are very real – manufacturers in Germany, which imports 95% of its rare earths from China, are being forced to hand over sensitive business information to secure the necessary materials.
China's strategy is not just about extracting economic advantage but also projecting power on a weaker rival. By leveraging its dominance in key industries like clean tech and automotive components, Beijing can shape Europe's industrial landscape to suit its own interests.
Europe's attempt to navigate this complex situation has been met with frustration. While Brussels has been using traditional tools like trade defenses to counter China's moves, member states are not doing enough to diversify their supply chains.
The EU is walking a tightrope between maintaining economic ties with China and defending its sovereignty. The anti-coercion instrument (ACI), a never-before-used trade defense law passed in 2023, could provide a critical safeguard against Chinese coercion. However, Germany remains hesitant to use it, citing concerns about retaliation.
The reality is that decoupling from China is not a viable option for Europe – it would have disastrous economic consequences. Instead, the EU must find a more nuanced approach to managing its relationship with Beijing. This may involve leveraging other global partners like the US to secure access to critical components and technologies.
For now, Europe remains at the mercy of China's economic leverage, forced to dance to Beijing's tune in industries that are critical to its economy. The stakes have never been higher – as Andrew Small, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund thinktank, notes, "China is repeatedly taking steps that does not actually stop industries from functioning but just chokes supplies."
In a bid to ease tensions, Beijing agreed to relax restrictions on automotive chip supplies to the EU, but the move was not without strings attached. The 12-month supply deal comes with a hefty price tag – Nexperia will only supply chips for civilian use, leaving the door open for future intervention in the EU's defense industry.
China is taking a deliberate approach in weaponizing its trading relationships with Europe. By choking off supplies of critical components like magnets and rare earths, Beijing can exert significant economic pressure on European industries. The risks to Europe are very real – manufacturers in Germany, which imports 95% of its rare earths from China, are being forced to hand over sensitive business information to secure the necessary materials.
China's strategy is not just about extracting economic advantage but also projecting power on a weaker rival. By leveraging its dominance in key industries like clean tech and automotive components, Beijing can shape Europe's industrial landscape to suit its own interests.
Europe's attempt to navigate this complex situation has been met with frustration. While Brussels has been using traditional tools like trade defenses to counter China's moves, member states are not doing enough to diversify their supply chains.
The EU is walking a tightrope between maintaining economic ties with China and defending its sovereignty. The anti-coercion instrument (ACI), a never-before-used trade defense law passed in 2023, could provide a critical safeguard against Chinese coercion. However, Germany remains hesitant to use it, citing concerns about retaliation.
The reality is that decoupling from China is not a viable option for Europe – it would have disastrous economic consequences. Instead, the EU must find a more nuanced approach to managing its relationship with Beijing. This may involve leveraging other global partners like the US to secure access to critical components and technologies.
For now, Europe remains at the mercy of China's economic leverage, forced to dance to Beijing's tune in industries that are critical to its economy. The stakes have never been higher – as Andrew Small, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund thinktank, notes, "China is repeatedly taking steps that does not actually stop industries from functioning but just chokes supplies."