New York Attorney General Letitia James has filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration's plan to slash funding for homeless housing programs. The move comes after the Department of Housing and Urban Development announced it would cut two-thirds of funding for long-term housing programs beginning next year.
The new policy prioritizes short-term programs that require participants to undergo treatment, work with law enforcement, or demonstrate employment status. Critics argue this approach punishes those who do not align with the administration's policies, particularly individuals struggling with mental illness and addiction disorders.
New York City stands to lose at least $109 million in housing grants, a significant blow to its efforts to house over 10,000 people across 8,400 units. Department of Social Services Commissioner Molly Wasow Park described the move as "a giant step backwards from what we know works."
Homeless advocates argue that reducing funding for supportive housing will drive up street homelessness and the shelter population, exacerbating an already dire crisis. Pascale Leone, executive director of the Supportive Housing Network of New York, warned that providers may be forced to shut down buildings due to lack of funding.
The Trump administration has maintained that its policy shift is necessary to address the root causes of homelessness. However, critics argue that this approach ignores the economic reality faced by many Americans and fails to provide a sustainable solution to the crisis.
New York joins a coalition of over a dozen states in challenging the new grant guidelines. The lawsuit argues that these conditions are unlawful and could potentially shut people out of aid based on their mental health or disability status.
In an effort to mitigate the impact, some lawmakers have urged HUD to extend grant contracts for another year. However, officials warn that the cuts will have a ripple effect, shifting money away from other programs and projects to fill the gap.
The new policy prioritizes short-term programs that require participants to undergo treatment, work with law enforcement, or demonstrate employment status. Critics argue this approach punishes those who do not align with the administration's policies, particularly individuals struggling with mental illness and addiction disorders.
New York City stands to lose at least $109 million in housing grants, a significant blow to its efforts to house over 10,000 people across 8,400 units. Department of Social Services Commissioner Molly Wasow Park described the move as "a giant step backwards from what we know works."
Homeless advocates argue that reducing funding for supportive housing will drive up street homelessness and the shelter population, exacerbating an already dire crisis. Pascale Leone, executive director of the Supportive Housing Network of New York, warned that providers may be forced to shut down buildings due to lack of funding.
The Trump administration has maintained that its policy shift is necessary to address the root causes of homelessness. However, critics argue that this approach ignores the economic reality faced by many Americans and fails to provide a sustainable solution to the crisis.
New York joins a coalition of over a dozen states in challenging the new grant guidelines. The lawsuit argues that these conditions are unlawful and could potentially shut people out of aid based on their mental health or disability status.
In an effort to mitigate the impact, some lawmakers have urged HUD to extend grant contracts for another year. However, officials warn that the cuts will have a ripple effect, shifting money away from other programs and projects to fill the gap.