New York City's NYPD Fails to Meet Deadline for Police Body Camera Footage, Audit Reveals
A scathing audit by New York City Comptroller Brad Lander has found that the NYPD consistently fails to meet deadlines for turning over video footage of police encounters. The review, which covered requests submitted between 2020 and 2024 under the city's freedom of information law, revealed that in many cases, the department didn't submit the footage until after an appeal was filed.
The audit suggests a system that relies heavily on appeals to resolve delayed responses. In most instances where the request was denied initially, the requester later appealed, only for the NYPD to turn over the footage afterwards. This raises questions about the effectiveness of body-worn cameras as a tool for increasing transparency and accountability in policing.
Comptroller Lander has emphasized the need for proper oversight of these cameras, stating that without it, they become mere "hunks of metal." The audit's findings highlight concerns that the NYPD is not adequately checking whether officers are activating their cameras correctly during encounters.
According to the report, nearly all denied requests were later granted after an appeal. However, experts point out that this may be due in part to a lack of transparency and accountability from the department itself.
The review also found significant delays in responding to body-worn camera footage requests. In most cases, the NYPD took over 133 business days to grant or deny a request, far exceeding the standard 25-day timeline set by city agencies for such responses.
In response to the audit's findings, the NYPD has agreed to several recommendations aimed at improving transparency and oversight of body-worn camera footage. These measures include increasing staffing at its Legal Bureau to handle FOIL requests and investigating lower activation rates at certain precincts across the city.
However, critics like Deputy Commissioner Kristine Ryan have disputed the audit's methodology, arguing that using 2020 data as a benchmark is "methodologically flawed" due to the extraordinary circumstances of that year.
A scathing audit by New York City Comptroller Brad Lander has found that the NYPD consistently fails to meet deadlines for turning over video footage of police encounters. The review, which covered requests submitted between 2020 and 2024 under the city's freedom of information law, revealed that in many cases, the department didn't submit the footage until after an appeal was filed.
The audit suggests a system that relies heavily on appeals to resolve delayed responses. In most instances where the request was denied initially, the requester later appealed, only for the NYPD to turn over the footage afterwards. This raises questions about the effectiveness of body-worn cameras as a tool for increasing transparency and accountability in policing.
Comptroller Lander has emphasized the need for proper oversight of these cameras, stating that without it, they become mere "hunks of metal." The audit's findings highlight concerns that the NYPD is not adequately checking whether officers are activating their cameras correctly during encounters.
According to the report, nearly all denied requests were later granted after an appeal. However, experts point out that this may be due in part to a lack of transparency and accountability from the department itself.
The review also found significant delays in responding to body-worn camera footage requests. In most cases, the NYPD took over 133 business days to grant or deny a request, far exceeding the standard 25-day timeline set by city agencies for such responses.
In response to the audit's findings, the NYPD has agreed to several recommendations aimed at improving transparency and oversight of body-worn camera footage. These measures include increasing staffing at its Legal Bureau to handle FOIL requests and investigating lower activation rates at certain precincts across the city.
However, critics like Deputy Commissioner Kristine Ryan have disputed the audit's methodology, arguing that using 2020 data as a benchmark is "methodologically flawed" due to the extraordinary circumstances of that year.