Bangladesh's ousted Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has been handed down a death sentence by an international crimes tribunal for her alleged role in the July and August crackdown on student-led protests that left hundreds dead. The three-judge bench found her guilty of inciting violence, ordering the use of lethal force against civilians, and failing to prevent atrocities.
In a dramatic reading of the verdict, Justice Golam Mortuza Mozumder stated that Hasina had committed crimes against humanity by using drones, helicopters, and lethal weapons against civilians. The sentence marks the culmination of months-long tribunal proceedings against Hasina in absentia, as she has been living in exile in India since fleeing Bangladesh last year.
The ruling comes amid heightened security across Dhaka ahead of the verdict, with police, army, and paramilitaries cordoning off the tribunal area and issuing a "shoot-on-sight" order for anyone caught launching explosives or setting fire to vehicles. The atmosphere was tense as protesters gathered outside the court building, with some carrying pictures of loved ones who died in the crackdown.
Hasina had pleaded not guilty to the charges, claiming that the tribunal was a "politically motivated charade." However, prosecutors presented audio recordings of calls made by Hasina to directly link instructions from her office to the deadly street operations. The prosecution described her as "the mastermind, conductor and superior commander" of the atrocities.
The verdict has brought relief to families of those killed in the uprising, with Golam Rahman, whose son was among the victims, stating that the death sentence was an "acceptable verdict for what was done to my child." Hasina's son Sajeeb Wazed also spoke out, saying his mother would remain "safe" but vowed to fight back against her opponents.
The ruling marks a significant development in Bangladesh's ongoing struggle for democracy and accountability. As the country prepares for its first election since Hasina's ouster, opposition parties have vowed to cause mass unrest in response to the verdict. With the interim government led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus claiming that the tribunal functioned transparently, human rights groups remain divided over the fairness of the trial process.
In a dramatic reading of the verdict, Justice Golam Mortuza Mozumder stated that Hasina had committed crimes against humanity by using drones, helicopters, and lethal weapons against civilians. The sentence marks the culmination of months-long tribunal proceedings against Hasina in absentia, as she has been living in exile in India since fleeing Bangladesh last year.
The ruling comes amid heightened security across Dhaka ahead of the verdict, with police, army, and paramilitaries cordoning off the tribunal area and issuing a "shoot-on-sight" order for anyone caught launching explosives or setting fire to vehicles. The atmosphere was tense as protesters gathered outside the court building, with some carrying pictures of loved ones who died in the crackdown.
Hasina had pleaded not guilty to the charges, claiming that the tribunal was a "politically motivated charade." However, prosecutors presented audio recordings of calls made by Hasina to directly link instructions from her office to the deadly street operations. The prosecution described her as "the mastermind, conductor and superior commander" of the atrocities.
The verdict has brought relief to families of those killed in the uprising, with Golam Rahman, whose son was among the victims, stating that the death sentence was an "acceptable verdict for what was done to my child." Hasina's son Sajeeb Wazed also spoke out, saying his mother would remain "safe" but vowed to fight back against her opponents.
The ruling marks a significant development in Bangladesh's ongoing struggle for democracy and accountability. As the country prepares for its first election since Hasina's ouster, opposition parties have vowed to cause mass unrest in response to the verdict. With the interim government led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus claiming that the tribunal functioned transparently, human rights groups remain divided over the fairness of the trial process.