Pakistan's parliament has approved a contentious constitutional amendment that will grant army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir unprecedented powers and lifelong immunity from prosecution. The move is seen as a significant blow to democracy in Pakistan, with critics labeling it a "funeral for democracy".
Under the amendment, Munir will be elevated to the newly created post of Chief of Defence Forces, overseeing all three branches of the military, while also holding absolute immunity from criminal prosecution. This will effectively render him above reproach and shield him from accountability.
The move is also expected to substantially undermine the independence of the Supreme Court, with a new federal constitutional court being established above it. The judges on this new court will be selected by the executive, removing any checks on their appointments or removals. Furthermore, the decision on how and where to transfer judges will rest solely with the president, eroding any semblance of an independent judiciary.
The amendment has been welcomed by figures within the ruling coalition government as a means to modernize and streamline the military and judicial systems. However, critics argue that it serves only to enshrine military rule and push Pakistan further down the path towards authoritarianism.
Pakistan has a history of military rule, with full dictatorships prevalent since its establishment in 1947. Even after the country transitioned to democracy in 2008, the powerful military continues to exert significant influence behind the scenes.
Munir's ascent to the army chief role has been marked by unprecedented international meetings, including two high-profile encounters with US President Donald Trump. His role as de facto ruler of Pakistan has raised concerns about the erosion of democratic norms and the consolidation of power in the hands of senior generals.
The amendment sailed through parliament with only four lawmakers opposing it, indicating a lack of strong opposition from within the government itself. However, several prominent parties, including Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), boycotted the vote due to their concerns over the move's implications for democracy and human rights.
Critics say that the amendment represents a significant threat to the rule of law in Pakistan, with lawyers and civil society activists denouncing it as "tampering with the constitution". Over 100 signatories have expressed concerns about the move, highlighting its potential impact on the country's democratic foundations.
Under the amendment, Munir will be elevated to the newly created post of Chief of Defence Forces, overseeing all three branches of the military, while also holding absolute immunity from criminal prosecution. This will effectively render him above reproach and shield him from accountability.
The move is also expected to substantially undermine the independence of the Supreme Court, with a new federal constitutional court being established above it. The judges on this new court will be selected by the executive, removing any checks on their appointments or removals. Furthermore, the decision on how and where to transfer judges will rest solely with the president, eroding any semblance of an independent judiciary.
The amendment has been welcomed by figures within the ruling coalition government as a means to modernize and streamline the military and judicial systems. However, critics argue that it serves only to enshrine military rule and push Pakistan further down the path towards authoritarianism.
Pakistan has a history of military rule, with full dictatorships prevalent since its establishment in 1947. Even after the country transitioned to democracy in 2008, the powerful military continues to exert significant influence behind the scenes.
Munir's ascent to the army chief role has been marked by unprecedented international meetings, including two high-profile encounters with US President Donald Trump. His role as de facto ruler of Pakistan has raised concerns about the erosion of democratic norms and the consolidation of power in the hands of senior generals.
The amendment sailed through parliament with only four lawmakers opposing it, indicating a lack of strong opposition from within the government itself. However, several prominent parties, including Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), boycotted the vote due to their concerns over the move's implications for democracy and human rights.
Critics say that the amendment represents a significant threat to the rule of law in Pakistan, with lawyers and civil society activists denouncing it as "tampering with the constitution". Over 100 signatories have expressed concerns about the move, highlighting its potential impact on the country's democratic foundations.