Police block Ukip march through Tower Hamlets over violence fears

Scotland Yard has taken a firm stance against far-right Ukip supporters by banning them from marching through Tower Hamlets on January 31st. The decision comes after months of tension in the area, with concerns that the event could boil over into serious violence.

While officials claim it's not a full-blown ban, they're imposing conditions to prevent any potential risks, citing the need to protect both local residents and police officers from potential harm.

Critics have drawn parallels with last year's Maccabi Tel Aviv fan incident in Birmingham, where some senior officers admitted that the force had caved under pressure from extremists, but Scotland Yard maintains the two cases are distinct.

This latest move comes as part of a growing trend of protests taking place across London, many of which have tested police resources to the limit. Harman acknowledged that Ukip's protest would be allowed to take place elsewhere if an alternative route could be found, while warning that any attendees believed to be connected to the group could face arrest.

As one of Britain's most culturally diverse boroughs, Tower Hamlets has a history of resisting racist attacks and hate crimes through peaceful resistance.
 
I think its a bloody good idea! ๐Ÿ™Œ Scotland Yard should do whatever it takes to keep people safe in Tower Hamlets, especially when there's been months of tension buildin' up. I mean, we can't have some far-right Ukip supporters causin' trouble and puttin' our local residents at risk, right? The fact that they're not exactly callin' it a ban is just semantics - the conditions they're imposin' are basically a ban in all but name.

And honestly, who's to say that this is a case of "cavering under pressure" like they did with the Maccabi Tel Aviv fans? I think its more likely that Scotland Yard's seen some real intelligence and are takin' proactive steps to prevent anythin' from goin' down. Plus, it's good to see Harman standin' firm on this one - she's doin' her part to protect the community and keep London safe. Fingers crossed it helps prevent any violence! ๐Ÿ‘
 
๐Ÿšจ just read that Scotland Yard is banning Ukip supporters from marching in Tower Hamlets... feels like a slippery slope tho ๐Ÿคฏ if they're gonna crack down on one group, what's next? ๐Ÿ˜ฌ got my money on another protest being ruined by far-right extremism this year. btw, it's wild how Harman says they'd let the protest happen elsewhere but still gotta arrest anyone "connected" to Ukip... what even is that? ๐Ÿค”
 
๐Ÿ™ I totally get why Scotland Yard is being super cautious here - those Ukip supporters have been causing so much tension in the area already ๐Ÿคฏ it's not just about protecting the residents, but also the police officers who are risking their lives to keep everyone safe ๐Ÿ’ช. I'm actually kinda relieved that they're taking a firm stance against hate groups like Ukip - we need more of this kind of leadership, you know? ๐Ÿ˜Š And yeah, it's interesting to see how Harman is handling the situation... alternative routes, arrests on the side... it's all about balance, right? ๐Ÿค
 
๐Ÿค” Scotland Yard's move to ban far-right Ukip supporters from marching in Tower Hamlets on January 31st is a step in the right direction, but it raises questions about how effective it'll be in preventing potential risks ๐Ÿšจ. I think what's concerning is that they're not taking a hardline stance and instead opting for conditions that may just allow them to regroup elsewhere ๐Ÿ‘Š. The fact that Harman mentioned allowing the protest to take place elsewhere if an alternative route can be found seems like a bit of a cop-out ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ.

What really gets me is how we're framing this as 'tough' on extremism, but also making it clear that anyone connected to Ukip will face arrest ๐Ÿ”’. It's not about letting the group march freely or giving them a free pass; it's about finding ways to address the underlying issues that lead people to support such ideologies ๐Ÿ’ก.

I'm also worried about how this affects the community in Tower Hamlets, who have a long history of resisting racist attacks and hate crimes through peaceful resistance ๐Ÿค. If we're going to create space for them to protest, shouldn't that be a more inclusive and less bureaucratic process? ๐Ÿค”
 
I don't get why they can't just let Ukip march there if it means keeping everyone safe? It feels like they're making it up as they go along ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. I mean, one minute they're saying no way, next minute they're being all flexible about finding an alternative route... it's confusing. And what's with the "not a full-blown ban" thing? Either you let them march or you don't - there's no in between ๐Ÿค”. It's just going to lead to more tension and potentially some bad stuff happening. I'm all for people being free to express themselves, but not when it comes at the cost of public safety ๐Ÿ˜•.
 
I'm not sure I agree with Scotland Yard's decision on this one ๐Ÿค”. It seems like they're prioritizing safety over free speech, which is already a pretty sensitive topic. The fact that they're willing to find an alternative route for the protest suggests that they don't think it's an all-out ban, so why impose conditions then? ๐Ÿ’ก

It does make sense from a practical standpoint, though - with tensions running high and the recent Maccabi Tel Aviv incident, you can't blame them for taking precautions. But at the same time, it feels like we're setting a precedent where protests are only allowed if they don't pose a risk to anyone ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ.

I'm just worried that this could be the start of something bigger, and we might see more restrictions on free speech in the future ๐Ÿ˜ฌ. Britain's always been a great place for people to express themselves, so I hope they can find a balance between safety and freedom ๐Ÿ’ฌ.
 
๐Ÿค” I don't think banning far-right Ukip supporters from marching is the right approach... ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ I mean, it's great that the police are taking steps to ensure public safety, but restricting their freedom of speech like this could be seen as an overreach. ๐Ÿšซ What if these protesters are just passionate about their views and want to express themselves? Shouldn't we be encouraging open dialogue and debate, not stifling it? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ I'm also concerned that this might set a precedent for other groups being banned or restricted from protesting in the future... ๐Ÿ“ Can't we find a way to balance security with freedom of expression? ๐Ÿ’ก
 
I'm so done with all these protests and marches... it feels like we're stuck in some kind of never-ending loop from the 80s, you know? Like, remember those old dystopian movies where the government would ban certain groups from marching, but they'd just find a way to circumvent the system? Yeah, this feels kinda like that ๐Ÿ™„. I mean, Ukip's got nothing on the BNP or the NF, if you ask me... all these far-right groups are just a bunch of noise, in my opinion.

But, for real, Tower Hamlets has always been a hub for community resistance and activism, since the 80s when the IRA was still around ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ. The fact that they're trying to protect residents from potential harm is exactly what this area needs โ€“ it's about time someone stood up to these extremist groups, if you ask me.

It's also kinda funny how Scotland Yard is acting like this is a new thing, when we've seen similar cases in the 90s and early 2000s... I mean, remember the Battle of Oldham in '96? ๐Ÿคฏ That was some wild stuff.
 
I'm so relieved they're taking this seriously ๐Ÿ™. It can't be easy dealing with that kind of tension in one area, especially when it comes to something as sensitive as politics and extremism. I think the fact that Harman is willing to let them march elsewhere if an alternative route can be found shows they're trying to find a balance between freedom of speech and public safety.

As a parent, it's heartbreaking to think about how easily things could escalate into violence ๐Ÿค•. I just hope all parties involved are being mindful of the impact their actions (or lack thereof) could have on our community's children who live in that area. We need to make sure we're teaching them not only about tolerance but also how to stand up for what they believe in without resorting to hate or aggression ๐Ÿ’ช.
 
I'm not sure about this new decision from Scotland Yard ๐Ÿค”. It seems like they're taking a pretty hard stance against these far-right Ukip supporters ๐Ÿšซ. I mean, I get why they want to protect the local residents and police officers - safety first, right? ๐Ÿ’ฏ But at the same time, isn't it fair to let people express their views in a peaceful way? Like, I know some of those protests can get pretty heated ๐Ÿ”ฅ, but you also gotta respect people's freedom of speech, you know?

And what really worries me is when people start to draw parallels with that Maccabi Tel Aviv fan incident last year ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ. That was a dark time for the police and it feels like they're still trying to recover from that. I don't think this new decision necessarily addresses the root causes of those tensions, just kind of sweeps them under the rug ๐Ÿ”ฎ.

Still, at the end of the day, safety is what matters most ๐Ÿ’•. If it means keeping people safe in Tower Hamlets, then I can kinda get behind it ๐Ÿ‘... but I still think there's gotta be a better way to handle things than this ๐Ÿค”
 
I'm loving how Scotland Yard is finally taking a stand against far-right extremists in Tower Hamlets! ๐Ÿ™Œ The fact that they're not fully banning the Ukip supporters but instead imposing conditions to prevent any risks shows they're willing to take a firm stance while still trying to find a balance. It's also interesting to see how Harman is offering an alternative route for the protest, which means attendees won't be able to converge on Tower Hamlets. ๐Ÿšซ I'm all about peaceful resistance in areas that have historically been targeted by hate crimes - it's so important for communities to come together and protect themselves! ๐Ÿ’ช
 
๐Ÿšจ I totally get why they're taking this stance ๐Ÿค Tower Hamlets is an area that's all about community & acceptance, you know? ๐Ÿ˜Š It's crazy to think that some people would even try to disrupt the peace there with far-right nonsense. The fact that Scotland Yard is putting conditions on the march to prevent things from getting out of hand is a good move in my opinion ๐Ÿ“. And yeah, it's not like they're banning the event outright, but still, safety should always be the top priority ๐Ÿš’. I'm glad Harman is being pragmatic about finding an alternative route for the protest if needed ๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ. The whole thing feels a bit like a warning shot across the bow to make people think twice before causing trouble ๐Ÿ”Š.
 
idk why they cant just let them march already? its not like their protest is gonna bring people together or anything ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ... i mean what's the big deal about a few far-right extremists showing up? but at the same time, idc if ppl get hurt either way. its all so predictable ๐Ÿ™„... and whats with the conditions they're imposing? like, can't they just ban them altogether then? ๐Ÿ˜’
 
Wow ๐Ÿคฏ, can't believe they're taking it so seriously this time around!
Interesting how Harman is willing to let the protest happen elsewhere if it means keeping things peaceful, but also cracking down on anyone connected to Ukip... like a big ol' grey area ๐ŸŒ€
And I'm with you, Tower Hamlets has always been all about standing up against hate & racism in its own unique way ๐ŸŒŽ
 
I'm totally with Harman on this one ๐Ÿค. The police have to prioritize public safety, especially in areas like Tower Hamlets where tensions are already running high. It's not about silencing free speech or cracking down on dissent, it's about preventing a potential powder keg situation that could put innocent lives at risk. I mean, can you imagine if the protest turned ugly and people got hurt? It'd be a disaster ๐Ÿšจ. The fact that Ukip is trying to whip up hate against the local community is just unacceptable. It's good that the police are taking a firm stance against extremism, even if it means limiting the group's ability to march through certain areas. And Harman's willingness to let the protest happen elsewhere if alternative arrangements can be made is a reasonable compromise. Tower Hamlets has always been a beacon of community and diversity, and I'm proud that it's standing up for itself against hate and intolerance ๐ŸŒŸ.
 
so glad to see scotland yard taking action against far-right groups ๐Ÿ™ they're not being heavy-handed or draconian, they're just making sure everyone's safety is protected. it's all about finding that balance between free speech and preventing harm to people & communities. i love how harman is saying that the protest would be allowed elsewhere if a better route could be found - shows he's open to compromise ๐Ÿค meanwhile, tower hamlets has always been a beacon of resistance against racism & hate crimes, so it's awesome to see more ppl taking a stand in solidarity ๐Ÿ’ช
 
can't say i'm surprised by this decision ๐Ÿค” tower hamlets is like a powder keg waiting for something to spark it off, and ukip's presence would've been a recipe for disaster ๐Ÿšจ the thing is, what's being proposed isn't exactly a ban either - it's more like a 'let's be cautious' approach, which i get. we all know how easily things can escalate when you've got a crowd of passionate people on one side and police officers trying to keep them in check ๐Ÿ˜ฌ at the end of the day, it's about keeping everyone safe ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
I don't get why they gotta make such a big deal about it... like, sure, safety is important, but you can't just ban a group from an event altogether. It's like, where does it end? Are they gonna start banning people for having certain views or something? ๐Ÿค” And what's with the conditions? "Protect both local residents and police officers"? What exactly does that even mean? It sounds like they're just making stuff up as they go along... and Harman's all like "if you can't do it here, you can do it elsewhere", but that's not exactly reassuring either. ๐Ÿ™„
 
man I'm all for keepin' it calm in Tower Hamlets ๐Ÿ™, but at the same time you gotta wonder how far these far-right groups are willin' to go ๐Ÿคฏ. I mean, banning 'em from marchin' there might seem like a good solution, but what about just puttin' 'em on notice that we won't stand for it? it's all about findin' that balance, you know? and btw, I think Harman's got the right idea by suggestin' they can still have their protest elsewhere... just gotta make sure those Ukip fans don't get a free pass ๐Ÿšซ.
 
Back
Top