Pontiac mayoral candidate convicted in election-fraud scheme faces challenge under Kwame-inspired ban - Detroit Metro Times

Pontiac Mayoral Candidate's Conviction Under Fire as He Pursues Office Despite Corruption Scandal.

A Wayne County Circuit Court judge will be tasked with determining whether Pontiac mayoral candidate Michael McGuinness is eligible to run for office under a state constitutional amendment inspired by former Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick's corruption scandal. The measure, passed in 2010 following widespread public outrage over corruption, bars former public officials convicted of felony crimes involving dishonesty or deceit from holding elected office or high-level public jobs for 20 years.

McGuinness, who served as chairman of the Oakland County Democratic Party during the 2010 election cycle, was involved in an election-fraud scheme. He was accused of forging documents and placing Tea Party candidates on the ballot under a third party to mislead voters and draw votes away from Republicans in several local races. In 2011, McGuinness was convicted of uttering and publishing and perjury and sentenced to probation, community service, and a $1,000 fine.

Now president of the Pontiac City Council, McGuinness is seeking to run for mayor despite his felony conviction. An activist has filed an emergency court motion questioning whether McGuinness's past conviction bars him from seeking public office under the state constitutional amendment inspired by Kilpatrick's corruption scandal.

Lawmakers said the measure was meant to restore confidence in government and prevent disgraced officials from returning to power following public outrage over political corruption. Detroit attorney Todd Russell Perkins, representing activist Marcus Kelley, who submitted the emergency court motion, argues that McGuinness's conviction raises important questions about public integrity and transparency.

"We're not just talking about felony offenses; we're talking about felony offenses in which he tried to affect the outcome of an election," Perkins said. "It remains unclear whether serving as a political party chair qualifies as holding a position in local, state, or federal government under the amendment."

Perkins added that McGuinness's case is not meant to be a personal attack but rather to determine if the candidate falls within the law. The unsealing of court records related to McGuinness's conviction could provide crucial information for voters in Pontiac.

The motion filed by Kelley argues that it is "in the public interest" to discover and learn about McGuinness's employment and specific circumstances surrounding his conviction, particularly since he was serving as chairman of the Oakland County Democratic Party at the time.
 
I don't usually comment but I'm kinda surprised that Michael McGuinness is still running for mayor despite being convicted of election fraud πŸ€”. Like, I get it, people make mistakes and all, but this guy's past conviction seems pretty serious to me πŸ˜’. And now there's some activist trying to figure out if he's eligible to run under a state law that's supposed to prevent exactly this kinda thing from happening again πŸ‘€. It's like, the law was put in place after Kwame Kilpatrick's whole corruption scandal went down, and it seems like McGuinness is basically playing with fire 🚨. I don't know what the judge will decide, but I hope someone's doing their due diligence to make sure this guy doesn't get away with some shady stuff πŸ’Ό.
 
OMG, can u believe this?? 🀯 So like, Michael McGuinness, who's running for mayor in Pontiac, has a felony conviction from 2011... and now he wanna be in office anyway? πŸ™„ Like, what even is that? He was convicted of election-fraud and forgery, and still thinks it's okay to run for public office? I'm literally shook 😲. And the fact that the activist is questioning whether this law applies to him is like, super relevant because, I mean, how can we trust someone with a felony conviction in their past to make good decisions for our community? πŸ€” Plus, it's not just about him, it's about restoring confidence in government and all that jazz... but still, it's kinda weird that he's not being held accountable for his actions πŸ™ƒ.
 
πŸ€” This whole situation with Michael McGuinness is super messy! 😬 He got convicted for some pretty shady stuff like election-fraud scheme, forging documents, and perjury... that's some serious red flags 🚨. And now he wants to run for mayor despite all this? It just doesn't add up πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ.

I mean, lawmakers said they passed the constitutional amendment to restore confidence in government and prevent corrupt officials from coming back to power. But here's McGuinness trying to do the exact opposite by running for office despite his conviction! πŸ’” It's like he thinks he can just waltz in and ignore all the laws that are supposed to protect us from people like him.

And what really gets me is that Perkins, the lawyer representing activist Marcus Kelley, is saying that McGuinness's case isn't about being a personal attack, but rather about determining if he's eligible to run under the law. And I'm like... yeah, dude, that's exactly what it should be! πŸ™„ We deserve to know the truth about our candidates and make informed decisions.

This whole thing just has me shook πŸ’₯. Can't we trust our politicians to do the right thing? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
πŸ€” Um, I mean, come on guys, what's wrong with being honest? So, Michael McGuinness gets in some trouble for trying to mess with the election, but now he's trying to run for mayor anyway? That doesn't make sense to me... πŸ™„ Like, didn't he learn his lesson when he got caught and convicted? I don't think serving on the city council is the same as running for mayor, especially considering what happened. The whole point of this constitutional amendment was to prevent people like Kilpatrick from coming back into power because they can't be trusted. πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ And now, McGuinness is trying to take advantage of it? No thanks... πŸ˜’
 
πŸ˜‚ So this guy gets convicted of election fraud and now he wants to be mayor? That's like trying to win a prize for 'Most Likely to Bribe Their Way to Power' πŸ†. And honestly, I'm not sure if 20 years is long enough for someone who's basically done one wrong thing already πŸ˜‚. It's like they say, 'once a cheater, always a cheater... or in this case, once an election fraudster, always trying to get back into politics' 🀣. Can't we just make the punishment 'volunteer work' for the next 20 years? That way everyone gets a chance to serve their community while doing some actual good πŸ’ͺ.
 
πŸ€” I'm not buying this whole 'I can still run for office despite my corruption conviction' thing. Like, come on, dude, you got caught up in a major election-fraud scheme and served probation? That's some serious shady stuff right there. And now you're trying to just waltz back into politics like nothing ever happened? πŸ™„

I get that politicians are human beings too and we all make mistakes, but this is different. You're not just talking about a little white lie or a mistake on the job – you were actively trying to cheat people out of their right to vote and manipulate the system for your own gain. That's not something you can just sweep under the rug and move on from.

And don't even get me started on the fact that he was chairman of the Oakland County Democratic Party at the time... like, wasn't that a supervisory role or something? Doesn't that count as holding a position in government? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

I think this whole situation stinks to high heaven and it's only going to serve as a distraction from actual issues in Pontiac. And honestly, I don't trust McGuinness one bit right now. πŸ’”
 
πŸ€” This whole situation just got super complicated 🀯. I mean, on one hand, it seems like McGuinness is trying to sweep his past under the rug πŸ˜’. He's already in a position of power with the city council, and now he wants to be mayor despite having a felony conviction? That's just not right πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ.

But on the other hand, I get why there are concerns about public integrity and transparency πŸ’‘. If someone is willing to play fast and loose with election laws like McGuinness did, it raises some serious questions about who they're really representing 😳.

I think what's most important here is that the people of Pontiac deserve to know what's going on πŸ—£οΈ. They need to be able to trust their elected officials, especially when it comes to something as big as the mayor's office πŸ’―.

The fact that McGuinness is trying to run for office despite his conviction just makes me think he's not being totally honest about himself πŸ‘€. And if that's the case, then maybe he shouldn't be in a position of power 🚫. It's time to shine some light on this situation and make sure everything is on the up and up πŸ’‘.
 
I'm totally down with this idea of making sure former officials who've been convicted of corruption can't get back into power so easily πŸ™Œ. It's all about maintaining integrity in government and keeping the public's trust. I mean, we've seen what happens when politicians think they're above the law - it's a total disaster 😬. If McGuinness is found ineligible to run for office, it's gonna send a strong message that corruption won't be tolerated in Pontiac. And can you believe he was chair of the Oakland County Democratic Party at the time? That's like being part of the inner circle 🀯. Anyway, I'm all about transparency and accountability in politics - let's keep it real! πŸ’―
 
πŸ˜• This all reminds me of that time I thought Bill Clinton would never get off for his impeachment... like, what a wild ride! 🀯 Now we got this Mike McGuinness fella trying to run for mayor despite being convicted of election fraud? It's just crazy how quickly people can change sides and forget about the mistakes of others. Did they not learn from Kwame Kilpatrick's mess back in the day? πŸ™„ I mean, I'm all for second chances, but not when it comes to breaking the law and messing with people's votes. The fact that this guy is even trying to run for office despite his conviction just goes to show how messed up our system can be sometimes... ugh, what's next?! 😩
 
Umm... so like, what's going on here? πŸ€” Michael McGuinness, who's running for mayor in Pontiac, got convicted of some serious stuff back in 2011. He's talking about election-fraud and trying to sway votes, which is super shady. And now he wants to be the one making decisions for the city? πŸ™„ Like, how does that even work?

And it gets even weirder because this whole thing happened in 2010, so like, five years ago. So why is he still getting away with it? πŸ˜’ The law says that if you've been convicted of certain crimes, you gotta wait for 20 years before you can run for office again. But McGuinness is all like "I'm good, I'll just ignore the rule and be mayor anyway". πŸ™ƒ

I don't get why he's not facing more consequences for this. Like, didn't he do something wrong? πŸ˜• The activist who's trying to stop him is saying that it's about public integrity and transparency, which sounds pretty legit to me. I mean, if someone tries to cheat in an election, that's a big deal. 🀝

I'm just confused because I don't see why McGuinness gets to just waltz back into politics after doing something so shady. Like, what's the point of even having laws if you can just ignore them? πŸ€”
 
omg u wont bliev wut's happnin in pontiac rn! michael mcguiness, who's currently presiding over the city council, is tryin 2 run 4 mayor despite bein convicted of election fraud & perjury 20 yrs ago 🀯 like, whats up wit that?? he got off scot free wit a slap on the wrist (probation, community service, and a $1k fine lol) but now theres activsts questioning whether hes eligible 2 hold public office b4. its not just bout the conviction, its about whether his past actions affectin an election r against the law πŸ€” so hopefully the judge will get to the bottom of it & voters in pontiac get the lowdown on mcguinesss employement & circumstances. this is def a situation to watch! πŸ’―
 
πŸ€” so michelle mcguinnis been convicted for some shady stuff like 4 years ago but now he wanna be mayors πŸ€‘πŸ’Έ how can u even? didnt do ur sentence prob or community serv or something πŸ‘Ž and what about the whole election fraud thing fam? that's like a big deal πŸ˜‚ and u want to run for office AGAIN? that's just not right πŸ’” shouldnt he do his time 4 real? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
Back
Top