Reference to Trump's impeachments removed from photo at Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery

US President Trump's portrait has had references to his two impeachments removed from the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery. The updated display now shows a photograph of Trump with no accompanying text, unlike previous versions which included information about his impeachments and Supreme Court nominations.

The change comes as part of an effort by the White House to shape how U.S. history is documented. In August, the White House ordered Smithsonian officials to review all exhibits before the nation's 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence on July 4. The Republican administration stated that the effort aimed to "celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions."

Before the changes, a description of Trump's first presidency noted his impeachments, stating he was "Impeached twice" before being acquitted by the Senate. However, this text has now been removed from the display.

The gallery stated that they are undergoing a larger refresh of their American Presidents gallery and will be using quotes or tombstone labels instead of biographical summaries for some new exhibitions. The history of Presidential impeachments remains represented in other museums, including the National Museum of American History.

Trump has made clear his intentions to shape how U.S. history is documented and culture is presented. He has also taken steps to reshape how he and his contemporary rivals are depicted, particularly with regards to their depiction in the "Presidential Walk of Fame" at the White House.
 
OMG 🀯 just saw that they removed Trump's impeachment references from the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery 😲 I mean, can't say I'm shocked tbh πŸ™ƒ it's not like this is the first time politics have influenced historical displays. But still, it's a bit weird to see a president's portrait without any context on it πŸ€” especially considering how much drama went down during his two impeachments πŸ“š

anywayz, I think it's super interesting that the White House is trying to shape our understanding of US history πŸ€“ and present it in a more... let's say, "neutral" way 😊 I mean, can't we just have an open conversation about our past instead of trying to sugarcoat it? πŸ’¬
 
This whole thing got me thinking... How do we decide what's 'divisive' or 'partisan' when it comes to our history? πŸ€” I mean, isn't the point of learning from the past to learn from our triumphs and mistakes alike? It seems like they're trying to sanitize Trump's record by erasing his impeachments, but what about all the others who've faced similar challenges? Are we really gonna rewrite history just because it makes some people uncomfortable? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ The gallery might say they're removing 'divisive' narratives, but aren't those exactly what make us human – our flaws and controversies? It's like trying to erase the shadows on a tree by painting them over. You can't change the past, but you can learn from it.
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure if it's a good idea to remove references to Trump's impeachments from the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery... I mean, isn't that part of history? πŸ›οΈ Shouldn't we be learning about all sides of the story, even if they're not always pretty? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ It seems like the White House is trying to shape how U.S. history is documented and it's kinda worrying... What about free speech? πŸ—£οΈ Are museums supposed to just follow what the government says? πŸ€”
 
OMG, like what's going on?! 🀯 Trump's portrait just got a major revamp at the Smithsonian and it's literally mind-blowing! I'm low-key freaking out because now his two impeachments are GONE πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈπŸ˜³. I mean, can you even believe it? The White House is trying to shape US history and it's like they're really going for it πŸ’ͺ. And let's be real, Trump loves this kind of thing... he's all about controlling the narrative and presenting his own version of reality πŸ“Ί. It's crazy to think that now his presidency is gonna be depicted as "just" his first term without any mention of the drama πŸ˜‚. I need to see more about how they're doing this in other museums, like the National Museum of American History... it's all soooo interesting πŸ€”.
 
OMG WHATS GOING ON WITH THE US PRESIDENTIAL PORTRAIT GALLERY?? I THOUGHT IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT SHAPING AMERICAN HISTORY NOT ERASING PART OF IT!!! 🀯 I GET WHY THEY WANT TO CELEBRATE AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM AND ALL THAT BUT CAN'T WE JUST KEEP THE IMPEACHMENT STUFF IN THERE TOO?!?! IT'S NOT LIKE IT WAS A BIG DEAL OR SOMETHING... WAIT, IT WAS TWO TIMES SO I GUESS IT IS πŸ˜‚. ANYWAY, IT SOUNDS LIKE THEY'RE TRYING TO CONTROL WHAT GETS SHOWCASED BUT WHY DO THEY NEED TO DO THAT? πŸ€”
 
idk why they're erasing this part of history πŸ€”... like, what's wrong with acknowledging someones 2 impeachments? it just shows how much power there is in the system and how it can affect people 🀯. but i guess that's the point - to make it seem less divisive or partisan πŸ€‘. its kinda weird that they're doing this now, after trump was out of office... like, cant we just leave things as they are? πŸ™„. plus, whats next? erasing other controversies too? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
just think about it 🀯 the US is literally erasing its history now lol like what's next gonna get rewritten or erased ?? this whole thing just smells like a big attempt by trump to cover his own tracks and rewrite history to suit his narrative 🚫
 
I'm so done with this update, you know? πŸ™„ I mean, come on! Removing references to Trump's impeachments from the National Portrait Gallery is like erasing a part of history, man... The Smithsonian is supposed to be all about preserving our cultural heritage, not whitewashing it. What's next, they gonna make sure his tweets are removed too? πŸ˜‚ I get that the White House wants to promote American exceptionalism and confidence in institutions, but this feels like an attempt to manipulate the narrative instead of having a real discussion. And let's be real, if we're gonna do it for Trump, why not for all our presidents, past and present? πŸ€”
 
lol think this change is actually kinda awesome 🀩! they're trying to move away from all that drama and controversy surrounding Trump's presidency and focus on celebrating American exceptionalism instead. it's like, we can still learn about history without having to sift through all the beef πŸ˜‚. and honestly, who needs to know every juicy detail about a president's past when you can just see their face and move on? gallery's gonna be way more chill now πŸ™Œ. btw, it's kinda cool that they're embracing quotes and tombstone labels for new exhibits – feels like a fresh start! πŸ’‘
 
I don't usually comment but I'm kinda surprised about this update πŸ€”. It's like they're trying to erase some part of history, you know? Removing details about Trump's impeachments just seems like a way to avoid talking about them altogether... and that doesn't sit well with me 😐. I get what the White House is trying to do – celebrate American exceptionalism and all that – but it feels like they're trying to cover up some pretty big controversies πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. What's next, gonna start rewriting schoolbooks too?
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure if removing Trump's impeachment references from the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery is a good idea. On one hand, it does show that the White House is trying to shape how US history is documented and promote some sense of unity. But on the other hand, it feels like they're trying to whitewash his time in office and gloss over some pretty significant controversies. I mean, who gets to decide what's "divisive" or "partisan"? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ And what about the value of acknowledging the complexities of American history? It's not all sunshine and rainbows, but it's part of what makes us interesting, right? Maybe they should just leave the quotes or tombstone labels alone and let the history speak for itself... 😊
 
πŸ™„ so they're just gonna leave it out now? that's just hiding the truth, you know? what's next? they'll be erasing the whole history of presidential scandals too... like, if anything, a bit of context about Trump's time in office should've been included, not removed. and why do they need to "celebrate American exceptionalism" anyway? it sounds like just an excuse for whitewashing his legacy. btw, this is just another example of how the powerful try to control the narrative...
 
😏 Just saw that Trump's portrait got a major makeover at the Smithsonian! They ditched the impeachment references because, let's be real, who wants to associate the 45th Prez with those drama-filled days? 🀣 But seriously, I think this is all about shaping history and culture to fit the administration's agenda. It's kinda interesting how they're trying to "celebrate American exceptionalism" by removing any narrative that might be seen as divisive. Still, I wonder what other changes we'll see before July 4th... πŸŽ‰
 
πŸ€” So I'm thinking, if they're trying to remove divisive or partisan narratives from history, isn't that kinda ironic? Like, shouldn't we be learning from our past and all that? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ It's also a bit weird that Trump is so heavily involved in this decision. Shouldn't it just be about preserving American history for future generations? The Smithsonian is like, super neutral and impartial, right? πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ
 
πŸ€” just wondering why they're doing this? like, isn't it okay to acknowledge past presidents' flaws and mistakes? it's all part of history, right? πŸ“š i mean, trump's got a lot going on in his past... two impeachments aren't exactly something to sweep under the rug. what's next? hiding stuff about obama's healthcare or Clinton's email scandal? 😬
 
πŸ€” just think about it, you gotta wonder what's going on here... they're tryin' to alter history right? like, who gets to decide how our stories get told? can't have one guy shapin' the narrative to fit his own agenda... that's not exactly the American way πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ. and i'm all for refreshin' exhibits and gettin' rid of divisive stuff, but at what cost? are we erasin' parts of our history that need bein' talked about? or just hidin' 'em so they don't offend anyone? need to have a more nuanced conversation about this 🀝.
 
πŸ€” so they're just gonna leave it out now? I mean, didn't we already figure out that Trump was a bit of a wild card during his first stint as President? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ no hard feelings or anything, but I'm not sure why they felt the need to sanitize history quite so much. I guess it's good that someone's keeping an eye on how US history is being presented, even if it means making some tough calls about what gets left out... or in this case, what gets removed from the portrait gallery πŸ–ΌοΈ
 
So they're trying to tone down Trump's legacy now πŸ€”. I think it's kinda weird that they're doing this on a national level, especially considering how many people have different opinions about him. It feels like an attempt to gloss over some pretty big controversies πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. The Smithsonian is all about preserving history and giving context, but by removing these references, they're essentially taking the discussion out of the equation πŸ’¬. Now it's up to other museums like the National Museum of American History to carry on that conversation. I'm kinda curious to see how this plays out in the long run πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
can u believe they're trying to erase trump's history now πŸ™„? it's like they think we forgot about the whole impeach thing πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. what's next, gonna rewrite the constitution too? i mean, come on, man... he was impeached TWICE! shouldn't that be part of our shared cultural institutions? or are they just trying to make him look all wholesome and stuff? lol, please don't try to whitewash his legacy πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. we should be having a convo about this not at the National Portrait Gallery, though... maybe at the Twitterverse 🀣
 
Back
Top