The article discusses the recent departure of Erik ten Hag as manager of Manchester United, and the reasons behind it. The author suggests that Ten Hag's inability to adapt his playing style to the team's strengths and weaknesses was a major factor in his departure.
The article also touches on the role of the club's hierarchy, particularly Ratcliffe and Berrada, in making decisions about the team's direction. The author questions whether they were too hasty in backing Ten Hag for the job, given his unconventional approach to the game.
Additionally, the article explores the impact of Amorim's departure on the team's recruitment strategy. The author notes that Amorim was wedded to a certain formation and players, which may not be the best fit for the team's current strengths and weaknesses.
Overall, the article presents a nuanced view of Ten Hag's departure, highlighting both the challenges he faced as manager and the role of the club's hierarchy in shaping his tenure.
The article also touches on the role of the club's hierarchy, particularly Ratcliffe and Berrada, in making decisions about the team's direction. The author questions whether they were too hasty in backing Ten Hag for the job, given his unconventional approach to the game.
Additionally, the article explores the impact of Amorim's departure on the team's recruitment strategy. The author notes that Amorim was wedded to a certain formation and players, which may not be the best fit for the team's current strengths and weaknesses.
Overall, the article presents a nuanced view of Ten Hag's departure, highlighting both the challenges he faced as manager and the role of the club's hierarchy in shaping his tenure.