TikTok's 'Union Busting' Accused as Workers Launch Legal Challenge Over Sacked Moderators
The social media giant has faced a new wave of criticism over its handling of content moderators in the UK, with hundreds of workers being fired just before they were set to vote on forming a union. The move, described by critics as "union busting," has sparked a legal challenge against TikTok, alleging unfair dismissal and breach of trade union laws.
The firing of around 400 content moderators in London took place during the week before their planned vote, with many workers having already experienced high levels of stress due to checking extreme and violent online content. The affected workers had expressed concerns about the lack of resources and support for the role, which was deemed "high pressure" by a union representative.
A TikTok spokesperson has denied any wrongdoing, stating that the sackings were part of a global restructuring process aimed at improving safety on the platform. However, critics argue that this excuse does not justify the company's actions, particularly in light of the use of AI to automate content moderation, which has reduced exposure to graphic material by 76%.
The Communication Workers Union, representing around 250 moderators who lost their jobs, claims that TikTok is trying to silence its workers and undermine labor laws. The union believes that the company prioritizes profits over user safety, citing instances of traumatic content being processed at high speed.
"This is holding TikTok to account for union busting," said John Chadfield, national officer for tech workers at the Communication Workers Union. "Content moderators have the most dangerous job on the internet and deserve better."
A legal challenge has been lodged with an employment tribunal, backed by the tech justice non-profit Foxglove, which argues that TikTok's actions are "appalling" and put users, including children, at risk.
As the case unfolds, labor advocates are calling for increased protections for content moderators and stronger regulations on big tech companies. With millions of users depending on the platform for social interaction and information, it remains to be seen how this legal challenge will impact TikTok's handling of online safety and moderation.
The social media giant has faced a new wave of criticism over its handling of content moderators in the UK, with hundreds of workers being fired just before they were set to vote on forming a union. The move, described by critics as "union busting," has sparked a legal challenge against TikTok, alleging unfair dismissal and breach of trade union laws.
The firing of around 400 content moderators in London took place during the week before their planned vote, with many workers having already experienced high levels of stress due to checking extreme and violent online content. The affected workers had expressed concerns about the lack of resources and support for the role, which was deemed "high pressure" by a union representative.
A TikTok spokesperson has denied any wrongdoing, stating that the sackings were part of a global restructuring process aimed at improving safety on the platform. However, critics argue that this excuse does not justify the company's actions, particularly in light of the use of AI to automate content moderation, which has reduced exposure to graphic material by 76%.
The Communication Workers Union, representing around 250 moderators who lost their jobs, claims that TikTok is trying to silence its workers and undermine labor laws. The union believes that the company prioritizes profits over user safety, citing instances of traumatic content being processed at high speed.
"This is holding TikTok to account for union busting," said John Chadfield, national officer for tech workers at the Communication Workers Union. "Content moderators have the most dangerous job on the internet and deserve better."
A legal challenge has been lodged with an employment tribunal, backed by the tech justice non-profit Foxglove, which argues that TikTok's actions are "appalling" and put users, including children, at risk.
As the case unfolds, labor advocates are calling for increased protections for content moderators and stronger regulations on big tech companies. With millions of users depending on the platform for social interaction and information, it remains to be seen how this legal challenge will impact TikTok's handling of online safety and moderation.
. Like, I get that companies need to make changes, but not at the expense of their workers' rights, you know? These content moderators were already under so much stress, dealing with all that graphic stuff 24/7. And then TikTok just fires them like that? It's just not cool, man 
.
. I mean, the fact that TikTok is using AI to automate content moderation just makes their whole situation more ridiculous – if they care so much about user safety, why are they getting rid of the people who actually do the hard work? 
. We need to start looking out for our content moderators and making sure they're treated with respect and care – they're not just numbers on a spreadsheet, you know? 
i mean what's wrong with ppl unionizing and having a say in their workplace? 
it sounds like they're just trying to squeeze more profit outta the company without caring about the impact on employees mental health 
have u ever had to watch violent vids all day? 
no thanks! 
. The fact that they claim it reduced exposure to graphic material by 76% is suspicious too, what does that even mean? Did they just magically make all the bad stuff disappear? I don't trust these big tech companies with my back 
. Like, can't a company just treat its employees with some basic respect? These moderators were basically told their livelihoods depended on not speaking up about the lack of support for their role... it's like, totally unfair 
.
. Like, that's just a fancy way of saying they're trying to cut costs and avoid accountability 
.
. It's time for some major reforms in the tech industry 
. Can we please get some stronger regulations on these big players? Our moderators deserve better 
. We should be calling for stronger regulations and better working conditions, not just lip service from the company 
. And now they're just getting fired? No wonder there's high stress and burnout 
. These workers deserve better 
. I hope the legal challenge goes through and changes things for the better 
76% less exposure to graphic material? sounds like a pretty sweet deal for them but not so much for the poor mods 
gotta keep big tech companies in check 
The fact that they used AI to automate content moderation so they wouldn't have to look at all the nasty stuff is just a cop-out... I mean, what kind of company prioritizes saving face over actual safety and well-being? 
This whole thing is just a recipe for disaster...