The safety of train users and staff is paramount, but it seems the government and rail companies are willing to gamble with lives. The recent spate of violent incidents on trains, including a mass stabbing on a busy train in Cambridgeshire, raises serious concerns about the decision to scrap driver-only trains. 
In fact, just two weeks ago, a railway employee made a heroic attempt to protect passengers from a lone attacker on the same train, highlighting the need for more support and resources for staff who are left to deal with emergencies alone. Can it really be right to leave the public and train drivers at the mercy of single manning?
It's not just the safety of passengers that is at stake โ the well-being of railway staff is also a major concern. Many have spoken out about the risks and stress they face in their roles, and it's imperative that these voices are listened to.
The introduction of driver-only trains is a case in point. With the risk of violent incidents on the rise, can we really afford to prioritize convenience over safety? The recent decision to delay the launch of an east-west train service between Oxford and Milton Keynes due to this issue only serves to underscore the need for more careful planning and consideration.
It's time to put passenger safety above all else. We need to see a renewed focus on providing adequate support and resources for railway staff, as well as safer trains that can withstand emergencies like the one on the Cambridgeshire train. Anything less would be irresponsible and unacceptable.
				
			In fact, just two weeks ago, a railway employee made a heroic attempt to protect passengers from a lone attacker on the same train, highlighting the need for more support and resources for staff who are left to deal with emergencies alone. Can it really be right to leave the public and train drivers at the mercy of single manning?
It's not just the safety of passengers that is at stake โ the well-being of railway staff is also a major concern. Many have spoken out about the risks and stress they face in their roles, and it's imperative that these voices are listened to.
The introduction of driver-only trains is a case in point. With the risk of violent incidents on the rise, can we really afford to prioritize convenience over safety? The recent decision to delay the launch of an east-west train service between Oxford and Milton Keynes due to this issue only serves to underscore the need for more careful planning and consideration.
It's time to put passenger safety above all else. We need to see a renewed focus on providing adequate support and resources for railway staff, as well as safer trains that can withstand emergencies like the one on the Cambridgeshire train. Anything less would be irresponsible and unacceptable.