Scarlett Johansson and Cate Blanchett back campaign accusing AI firms of theft

I'm telling ya, this is way deeper than just some Hollywood folks complaining about AI firms using their stuff πŸ€”. I mean, think about it - these AI companies are basically using publicly available data to make billions off our creative work without even asking permission. It's like they're getting away with plagiarism on a massive scale πŸ˜’. And now they're saying "oh, we're doing it for fair use"? Give me a break! πŸ™„ They want to label everything as "fair use" just so they can keep profiting off our work without paying up πŸ’Έ. I'm all for innovation and progress, but not if it comes at the expense of creators' rights 🎨. This whole thing reeks of corporate greed and manipulation 🚫. Mark my words, this is just the beginning - they're going to push back hard against these creatives and try to silence them πŸ’£.
 
Man, I'm loving this wave of creatives standing up for their rights 🀝🎨. It's crazy how these big AI firms just swoop in and use people's work without giving them a dime πŸ’Έ. I mean, I get that they're using public domain materials, but come on, that doesn't excuse the lack of permission or compensation πŸ’”.

It's wild to see all these Hollywood heavyweights getting together on this issue 🎬. Cate Blanchett and Cyndi Lauper are like, "Hey, we're not just artists, we're also humans with families to feed" πŸ‘¨β€πŸ‘©β€πŸ‘§β€πŸ‘¦.

But at the same time, I can see where these AI firms are coming from πŸ€”. They do seem to be relying on a lot of public domain materials, and it's not like they're profiting off people's work directly πŸ’Έ.

I just wish we had better solutions for this issue πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. Maybe there's a way to balance innovation with fairness? Like, can't we find a middle ground where everyone gets paid fairly for their contributions? πŸ€‘
 
I'm so done with these AI companies 🀯 they're basically just copying off the work of others and expecting it's okay because they're "using public domain" lol what even is that πŸ™„ they think they can just use our creativity and sell it as their own? give me a break πŸ’β€β™€οΈ I mean, sure Scarlett Johansson got burned by OpenAI but at least she spoke up about it πŸ—£οΈ we should all be doing the same thing instead of waiting for someone to sue us first πŸ˜… and another thing, if AI firms are using so much "public domain" material, shouldn't they be paying royalties or something? πŸ€‘ it's not like that stuff just magically appears in their models πŸ’» I'm all about fairness and transparency when it comes to intellectual property rights πŸ’―
 
🀯 I'm low-key surprised by how fast this issue is blowing up πŸš€. As someone who's all about format and structure, I can see both sides of this argument πŸ“. On one hand, AI firms are literally just using publicly available data to train their models πŸ’». But on the other hand, it's a whole lot easier for them to use that data rather than getting permission from copyright holders πŸ™…β€β™€οΈ.

I think what's really important here is setting some clear guidelines around "fair use" vs actual permission πŸ“. We need more transparency in AI development so creatives know how their work is being used πŸ’‘. And let's be real, if you're gonna make money off someone else's IP, you should at least give them a shoutout or something πŸ‘Š.

This whole thing is just a reminder that the digital age is changing the way we think about ownership and creativity πŸ“±. We need to adapt our laws and regulations to keep up with these new developments πŸ”„. Can't wait to see how this plays out πŸ€”.
 
πŸ€” I'm not surprised to see Hollywood heavyweights joining forces over this issue - it's only fair that creatives are compensated for their work πŸŽ­πŸ’Έ. The AI firms' reliance on public domain materials without permission is like taking someone else's art and passing it off as your own... that just ain't cool πŸ˜’. I'm all about innovation, but let's make sure we're not sacrificing creators' rights in the process πŸ’‘. It's time for these tech giants to get creative and find ways to work with, not against, the people who are making their AI models possible 🀝. We need to see more transparency and fair compensation - it's about time! πŸ’ͺ
 
I'm not surprised to see Hollywood heavyweights uniting over a common issue like this πŸ€”. I mean, who wouldn't want to protect their work and get paid for it? But at the same time, I think we have to consider the bigger picture here - AI is just getting more advanced and powerful by the day, so some form of collaboration or licensing deal seems like a necessary evil.

I'm not entirely convinced that "stealing" is the right word to use here, though πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. These tech firms are basically using publicly available data to train their models, so I guess you could argue it's fair use? But still, shouldn't they be making some form of compensation for using people's work without permission?

The fact that we're already seeing lawsuits over this stuff is pretty wild 🀯. It just goes to show how fast the game is changing and how quickly our laws are getting left behind. I guess what I'm saying is, let's all try to stay calm and think about finding a solution that works for everyone... even if it means making some compromises πŸ™.
 
Back
Top