I gotta say, I'm intrigued by Luc Donckerwolke's approach to winning 
. On one hand, it's awesome that he's pushing for greatness and willing to take risks – that's what gets you noticed in the cutthroat world of motorsports 
. But at the same time, I'm a bit concerned about him being too optimistic about their chances. Like, three years might be a pretty aggressive timeline to become a WEC contender 
. Still, it'll be interesting to see how he navigates the balance between innovation and rules adherence – that's what separates the heroes from the zeroes 
.
. On one hand, it's awesome that he's pushing for greatness and willing to take risks – that's what gets you noticed in the cutthroat world of motorsports . But at the same time, I'm a bit concerned about him being too optimistic about their chances. Like, three years might be a pretty aggressive timeline to become a WEC contender . Still, it'll be interesting to see how he navigates the balance between innovation and rules adherence – that's what separates the heroes from the zeroes .
genesis is trying to make a name for themselves but it's just gonna be hard to compete with established brands like porsche and ferrari, especially if they're putting all their eggs in one basket like the wec. also i'm skeptical about the "emotional bonding" angle - isn't that just corporate speak for trying to appeal to young Koreans? 
. Donckerwolke sounds like a total go-getter, but can't he just chill for once? Three race wins in six races is impressive, but does it really take two to three years to become a contender? I mean, what's the plan B? Are they gonna crash and burn? 
And let's be real, Euisin Chung's quote about winning sounds like marketing speak. "Tell me what you need to win" is just a fancy way of saying "let's make some money". 
I'm all for innovation and pushing boundaries, but can't we just have a discussion about the rules instead of ignoring them? 