The way they're looking at this is so cool

... think of it like when you're doodling on a notepad

and you add an extra curve or line that changes the whole vibe of the drawing, right? That's what Brit Edelen is saying, but instead of changing the shape of the picture, Styles is playing with the words to make them more dynamic.
And I mean, we're already in 2025, so by now we should be used to seeing all kinds of weird and wonderful art forms out there

... like experimental music, or poetry that doesn't follow traditional rules

.
For me, the question isn't whether it's "correct" grammar or not, but more like, how does it make you feel when you see those commas? Does it add to the energy of the title, or does it make you think too hard about it? I say, if it makes it sound cool and catchy to me, then job well done, Harry

.
It's also worth noting that punctuation can be super subjective

... like what constitutes a "correct" use of commas? Is it just the US English way of doing things, or is there some other standard that we're supposed to follow?
Anyway, I think Styles has got something going on here

... and even if some people are like, "Uh, isn't that comma in the wrong place?"... ultimately, it's all about how you respond to it. Do you appreciate the risk-taking, or do you prefer to stick with what you know?
