This whole situation is like a big mess 
. If Raymond was never actually Corvex's CTO, then why did they list him as such in their press release and SEC filings? It sounds like they're trying to cover their tracks, but it just makes things worse.I'm not surprised that Corvex is denying the whole thing now that Raymond got indicted. They probably knew he was involved in something shady and didn't want it getting out. But this raises so many questions - did they really think they could get away with it? Were their investors aware of what was going on?
It's like, if you're gonna make a claim, own up to it and be honest about it. Don't just change your story midstream when things start to go south. It's not exactly rocket science
.I think Corvex needs to come clean about this whole thing and explain what really went down. Transparency is key in situations like this. Until then, I'll be keeping a close eye on this one
corvex seems to be playing with fire here, trying to spin a narrative that could've been avoided from the get-go 
their attempt to downplay raymond's role is just confusing and makes me question everything they said before 
i'm curious to see how this all unfolds, especially when it comes to the impact on investors 
And meanwhile, who gets to decide what's true and what's not? Investors, shareholders, or is it something more complex than that? The more I think about it, the more I realize that this whole thing is a microcosm of our own moral ambiguity. We're all just trying to navigate the gray areas, right? 