Ugh I mean yay?
They're trying to save this historic building from being sold off, but at what cost?
Like, the city's all about safety concerns and stuff, which I get, but come on, can't they find a way to help tenants without displacing them?
But then again, what if the current owners are just trying to clean up the building for its true potential? Maybe this is an opportunity for the community to come together and find a new use for the space?
On the other hand, it's not like they're being transparent about their plans or anything...
I mean, I feel bad for the tenants who lost their homes in December, but what if they were all just getting in the way of progress?
Like, maybe this is a chance for them to move on and find better things.
But then again, that's not really fair to people who are already struggling...
Can we just take a step back and think about what's best for everyone involved here?
Maybe there's a way to make this work without hurting anyone?
just got my hands on some deets about the Leland House situation 
its crazy that the city is more worried about "safety" than the tenants' well-being... like what's the point of having a progressive mayor if she's gonna prioritize profits over people? 
anyway, I think it's super reasonable for the tenants to want their stuff back and for the court to pause enforcement. its not too much to ask for a safe and dignified place to call home 
and btw, has anyone thought about what would happen if the city just renovated the building instead of auctioning it off? 