omg i was so confused by the original html code lol what's with all the nested divs?! 
it looks like they used way too many classes and ids. the refactored version makes way more sense, tho! using shorter names for elements is a good idea. i wish they'd also included the css styles in the example tho. that would've been super helpful.
it looks like they used way too many classes and ids. the refactored version makes way more sense, tho! using shorter names for elements is a good idea. i wish they'd also included the css styles in the example tho. that would've been super helpful.
The refactored HTML code is really well done, makes so much sense now with all the different sections like header, main content, grid views and whatnot. And you know what’s even better? It's still super easy to read and maintain, which is more than I can say for some other coding projects I've seen 
. I love how they've broken down long elements into shorter ones and used more descriptive class names 
. It makes total sense why they'd want to improve readability for maintainability purposes 
. And yeah, it's pretty cool that they didn't mess with the CSS or JS code 
. One tiny suggestion I might make is adding some comments to explain what each section of the refactored HTML does, but overall, it looks like a solid job 
!
. I was reading about website building and came across this HTML code example. It's amazing how much of a difference refactoring code can make in terms of readability and maintainability. The use of CSS frameworks like Guis makes it super easy to style websites without having to write all that code from scratch. Can't believe some devs still have to do that, right? 