China's Low-Cost Solar Revolution Is Killing the 'Green Premium'
Critics in North America often dismiss the growing clean tech industry as an overpriced niche for environmentalists, unaware of the exponential change it is driving in major industries. The term "green premium" refers to the higher cost associated with eco-friendly products and services. However, China's entry into the market with affordable solar panels, wind turbines, electric vehicles (EVs), and critical minerals has killed this premium.
The analogy of a chess game comes to mind here. A king is presented with any reward he can name, but eventually realizes that the total number of grains on the board becomes astronomical by the 64th square, far exceeding his kingdom's rice production. In a similar manner, today's cleantech critics have underestimated exponential growth and failed to recognize China's significant advancements in clean energy.
The green premium is dead, replaced by what can be described as the "fossil premium." This phenomenon refers to the artificially high cost of fossil fuels due to protectionist measures such as tariffs. The impact on North American automakers has been severe, with many scaling back EV production and delaying or canceling projects altogether. Canada's electric vehicle and battery projects are no exception.
To put this into perspective, consider a Chinese-made electric hatchback called the BYD Dolphin Surf, which starts at €22,950 (approximately $26,552 USD) and boasts a range of up to 265 miles. This compares favorably to more expensive EVs like the Tesla 3. The difference in pricing is largely due to China's low-cost solar panels, wind turbines, and batteries.
Tariffs are the only thing temporarily saving North American carmakers from BYD. However, as long as tariffs remain in place, consumers will be forced to pay a higher premium for fossil fuels, which can have significant economic and political consequences.
The fossil premium extends beyond the automotive industry to electricity production. Onshore wind and utility-scale solar have been the most affordable sources of energy for the last decade, according to financial advisory firm Lazard. Furthermore, the International Renewable Energy Agency found that 91% of renewable energy projects commissioned in 2024 were more cost-effective than any new fossil fuel alternatives.
The IEA estimates that investment in clean energy will hit $2.2 trillion in 2025, about double the $1.1 trillion going to fossil fuels. Most investors are not green idealists but rather expect stronger returns from clean energy.
Denying reality is having severe economic consequences for North America and Europe. China must be thrilled with its dominance in solar cell production, battery cell capacity, wind-turbine manufacturing value, rare earth mineral production, and rare earth refining.
The transition to clean energy is not happening overnight. However, it's essential to recognize that the current pace of change can lead to significant economic benefits in the long run. BloombergNEF founder Michael Liebreich estimates that global energy demand will continue to grow at 2% annually, while renewables will grow at 5%, leading to a substantial decline in fossil fuel use by 2045 and eventual phasing out by 2065.
The West is not losing the future yet. The key difference now is that clean tech economics work without subsidies. A $13,000 BYD running on cheap solar and wind is a better value proposition than a $22,000 vehicle running on subsidized gasoline.
As countries continue to invest in clean energy, they will dominate the next century by producing abundant, affordable, and clean power. The West should acknowledge this reality and act accordingly.
Critics in North America often dismiss the growing clean tech industry as an overpriced niche for environmentalists, unaware of the exponential change it is driving in major industries. The term "green premium" refers to the higher cost associated with eco-friendly products and services. However, China's entry into the market with affordable solar panels, wind turbines, electric vehicles (EVs), and critical minerals has killed this premium.
The analogy of a chess game comes to mind here. A king is presented with any reward he can name, but eventually realizes that the total number of grains on the board becomes astronomical by the 64th square, far exceeding his kingdom's rice production. In a similar manner, today's cleantech critics have underestimated exponential growth and failed to recognize China's significant advancements in clean energy.
The green premium is dead, replaced by what can be described as the "fossil premium." This phenomenon refers to the artificially high cost of fossil fuels due to protectionist measures such as tariffs. The impact on North American automakers has been severe, with many scaling back EV production and delaying or canceling projects altogether. Canada's electric vehicle and battery projects are no exception.
To put this into perspective, consider a Chinese-made electric hatchback called the BYD Dolphin Surf, which starts at €22,950 (approximately $26,552 USD) and boasts a range of up to 265 miles. This compares favorably to more expensive EVs like the Tesla 3. The difference in pricing is largely due to China's low-cost solar panels, wind turbines, and batteries.
Tariffs are the only thing temporarily saving North American carmakers from BYD. However, as long as tariffs remain in place, consumers will be forced to pay a higher premium for fossil fuels, which can have significant economic and political consequences.
The fossil premium extends beyond the automotive industry to electricity production. Onshore wind and utility-scale solar have been the most affordable sources of energy for the last decade, according to financial advisory firm Lazard. Furthermore, the International Renewable Energy Agency found that 91% of renewable energy projects commissioned in 2024 were more cost-effective than any new fossil fuel alternatives.
The IEA estimates that investment in clean energy will hit $2.2 trillion in 2025, about double the $1.1 trillion going to fossil fuels. Most investors are not green idealists but rather expect stronger returns from clean energy.
Denying reality is having severe economic consequences for North America and Europe. China must be thrilled with its dominance in solar cell production, battery cell capacity, wind-turbine manufacturing value, rare earth mineral production, and rare earth refining.
The transition to clean energy is not happening overnight. However, it's essential to recognize that the current pace of change can lead to significant economic benefits in the long run. BloombergNEF founder Michael Liebreich estimates that global energy demand will continue to grow at 2% annually, while renewables will grow at 5%, leading to a substantial decline in fossil fuel use by 2045 and eventual phasing out by 2065.
The West is not losing the future yet. The key difference now is that clean tech economics work without subsidies. A $13,000 BYD running on cheap solar and wind is a better value proposition than a $22,000 vehicle running on subsidized gasoline.
As countries continue to invest in clean energy, they will dominate the next century by producing abundant, affordable, and clean power. The West should acknowledge this reality and act accordingly.
. Anyway, so China's killing the "green premium" thing with their super cheap solar panels... it's about time someone brought down those prices 
. North America's been living in a bubble thinking clean tech is just for eco-warriors and rich investors. Newsflash: it's not just about saving the planet, it's about making money too 
.
. If China can make electric cars that beat out Tesla at half the price, why do we need to keep paying more for gas? It's just not fair to consumers anymore 
. And don't even get me started on the "fossil premium" - it's like they're trying to hold us back or something 
.
. $2 trillion for renewables vs $1 trillion for fossil fuels... that's a pretty clear winner 
. And BloombergNEF says renewables will grow at 5% while energy demand grows at 2%. That's some serious momentum 
️.
.
. we should be grateful china is making clean energy more accessible
.
. It's not just about protecting American carmakers; it's about consumers like us who are paying more for fossil fuels because of tariffs 
.
. The West needs to catch up and acknowledge that clean tech economics are working without subsidies 
it's game changing for electric vehicles and renewable energy in general. They're basically making fossils look expensive 
and it's not just about the solar panels, they're also killing it in battery production 
. They're like a Band-Aid on a bullet wound. North American automakers are gonna keep losing money until they start innovating and coming up with their own green solutions, not just relying on subsidies and tariffs to stay afloat.
. And $2.2 trillion in clean energy investment this year? That's what I call a wake-up call.
.
. The analogy of the chess game, where an overemphasis on short-term gains becomes unsustainable in favor of exponential growth, serves as a fitting metaphor for the cleantech landscape 
.
.
. I mean, their solar panels are killing the "green premium" - basically, they're making eco-friendly products more affordable than ever. It's crazy to think that by 2045, fossil fuel use will decline and eventually phase out 
. They're investing massive amounts of money in solar cell production, battery capacity, and wind turbine manufacturing value 
. Europe & NA need to step up their clean energy game or get left behind, sadly 
, making clean tech so cheap that it's basically free money for everyone except fossil fuel companies, which is why they're all crying foul with tariffs 