Louisiana's Department of Wildlife and Fisheries has been detained at least six people in federal custody this year, as part of a partnership with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The agency, which typically oversees wildlife reserves and enforces local hunting rules, signed a memorandum of agreement with ICE in May that gives it the authority to detain individuals suspected of immigration violations.
Under the program, known as 287(g), state and local law enforcement agencies can work with federal authorities to investigate, apprehend, and deport individuals who are believed to be in the US illegally. The partnership has expanded significantly this year, with over 1,000 agencies signing on to the program - a 693% increase compared to last year.
The LDWF is one of only three state wildlife agencies that have partnered with ICE through the 287(g) program, according to public records. All three agreements were signed in May, and the agency has been actively detaining people not guilty of any crimes, facilitating their arrests and possible deportations.
One incident report obtained by WIRED describes a joint patrol conducted by LDWF officers with US Coast Guard and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents in August. The officers were searching for individuals suspected of violating state statutes related to seed oyster harvesting, but no one was seen committing any crimes. However, three men were taken into federal custody after being identified as potential immigration violators.
The reports reveal that the LDWF has been working closely with CBP and ICE to identify and detain individuals suspected of immigration violations. The agency has also been using its patrols to enforce local laws related to hunting and wildlife management.
When asked for comment, a spokesperson for the LDWF acknowledged that the agency had made contact with Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) regarding one individual who was issued a final removal order. However, they did not confirm whether the man had been deported or remained in federal custody.
The reports raise questions about the role of state wildlife agencies in enforcing immigration laws and the potential for abuse of power. Critics argue that such partnerships can lead to the detention of innocent people and undermine trust between law enforcement and immigrant communities.
Under the program, known as 287(g), state and local law enforcement agencies can work with federal authorities to investigate, apprehend, and deport individuals who are believed to be in the US illegally. The partnership has expanded significantly this year, with over 1,000 agencies signing on to the program - a 693% increase compared to last year.
The LDWF is one of only three state wildlife agencies that have partnered with ICE through the 287(g) program, according to public records. All three agreements were signed in May, and the agency has been actively detaining people not guilty of any crimes, facilitating their arrests and possible deportations.
One incident report obtained by WIRED describes a joint patrol conducted by LDWF officers with US Coast Guard and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents in August. The officers were searching for individuals suspected of violating state statutes related to seed oyster harvesting, but no one was seen committing any crimes. However, three men were taken into federal custody after being identified as potential immigration violators.
The reports reveal that the LDWF has been working closely with CBP and ICE to identify and detain individuals suspected of immigration violations. The agency has also been using its patrols to enforce local laws related to hunting and wildlife management.
When asked for comment, a spokesperson for the LDWF acknowledged that the agency had made contact with Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) regarding one individual who was issued a final removal order. However, they did not confirm whether the man had been deported or remained in federal custody.
The reports raise questions about the role of state wildlife agencies in enforcing immigration laws and the potential for abuse of power. Critics argue that such partnerships can lead to the detention of innocent people and undermine trust between law enforcement and immigrant communities.