Netflix's Formula for Filmmaking Success is a Recipe for Disaster
The latest addition to Netflix's police procedural thriller genre, "The Rip," highlights the streaming giant's questionable approach to filmmaking. This movie, starring Matt Damon and Ben Affleck, has all the makings of a decent action film: plenty of twists, turns, and high-stakes tension.
However, it's the constant repetition and over-explanation that truly sets this film apart from its more intelligent counterparts. The protagonist, Lieutenant Dane Dumars, constantly checks his phone to see a picture of his late son, as if to remind viewers of his backstory. The problem is that this detail feels forced, like a crutch for an audience member who might be too distracted to absorb the film's narrative.
As one critic astutely notes, the inclusion of this character quirk has become a staple of Netflix filmmaking, aimed at catering to viewers who are glued to their phones while watching. The result is a constant barrage of repetition that feels more like a shallow attempt to coddle the audience rather than genuinely engage them.
But what's truly alarming is how far this approach has gone. Even two-time Oscar winner Ben Affleck, one of the film's co-stars and writers, can't resist pointing out the flaws in Netflix's formula. In an interview with Joe Rogan, Affleck suggests that popular shows like "Adolescence" demonstrate a different approach to storytelling – one that balances the need for explanation with genuine emotional resonance.
The contrast between these two productions is jarring. While "The Rip" feels like a cynical attempt to tick off every box on Netflix's formulaic checklist, "Adolescence" showcases the power of intelligent filmmaking that prioritizes plot over pander. It raises an uncomfortable question: are we the ones who've been complicit in this trend, or is it just the way the algorithm works?
The answer, unfortunately, seems to be yes – and no. We have the power to choose what we watch, but our habits as viewers often prioritize convenience over quality. By embracing these formulaic approaches to storytelling, we're allowing Netflix to shape our cinematic experiences in ways that compromise artistic integrity.
As we continue to binge-watch "The Rip" or its ilk, let's take a moment to reflect on the impact of our choices. It's time to turn off the autopilot and demand more from the films we watch – not just for ourselves, but for the sake of future generations of filmmakers who will be forced to navigate this cluttered landscape.
As Affleck so eloquently puts it, "We need to screw with their data, and fast." By supporting intelligent, well-crafted content, we can begin to create a new model for storytelling that prioritizes respect over repetition.
The latest addition to Netflix's police procedural thriller genre, "The Rip," highlights the streaming giant's questionable approach to filmmaking. This movie, starring Matt Damon and Ben Affleck, has all the makings of a decent action film: plenty of twists, turns, and high-stakes tension.
However, it's the constant repetition and over-explanation that truly sets this film apart from its more intelligent counterparts. The protagonist, Lieutenant Dane Dumars, constantly checks his phone to see a picture of his late son, as if to remind viewers of his backstory. The problem is that this detail feels forced, like a crutch for an audience member who might be too distracted to absorb the film's narrative.
As one critic astutely notes, the inclusion of this character quirk has become a staple of Netflix filmmaking, aimed at catering to viewers who are glued to their phones while watching. The result is a constant barrage of repetition that feels more like a shallow attempt to coddle the audience rather than genuinely engage them.
But what's truly alarming is how far this approach has gone. Even two-time Oscar winner Ben Affleck, one of the film's co-stars and writers, can't resist pointing out the flaws in Netflix's formula. In an interview with Joe Rogan, Affleck suggests that popular shows like "Adolescence" demonstrate a different approach to storytelling – one that balances the need for explanation with genuine emotional resonance.
The contrast between these two productions is jarring. While "The Rip" feels like a cynical attempt to tick off every box on Netflix's formulaic checklist, "Adolescence" showcases the power of intelligent filmmaking that prioritizes plot over pander. It raises an uncomfortable question: are we the ones who've been complicit in this trend, or is it just the way the algorithm works?
The answer, unfortunately, seems to be yes – and no. We have the power to choose what we watch, but our habits as viewers often prioritize convenience over quality. By embracing these formulaic approaches to storytelling, we're allowing Netflix to shape our cinematic experiences in ways that compromise artistic integrity.
As we continue to binge-watch "The Rip" or its ilk, let's take a moment to reflect on the impact of our choices. It's time to turn off the autopilot and demand more from the films we watch – not just for ourselves, but for the sake of future generations of filmmakers who will be forced to navigate this cluttered landscape.
As Affleck so eloquently puts it, "We need to screw with their data, and fast." By supporting intelligent, well-crafted content, we can begin to create a new model for storytelling that prioritizes respect over repetition.