The lack of nuance in recent Hollywood movies that tackle the threat of autocracy in America is a worrying trend. Many films, such as Netflix's latest release Anniversary, focus on the more sensational aspects of this issue, opting for explosive confrontations over detailed explorations of how we arrived at this point.
While Anniversary shows promise in its first half, where Diane Lane plays a centrist mom trying to keep her family and the discourse together, it ultimately falls short by glossing over the finer details of how a subtle shift in language can lead to an Orwellian-style assault on democracy. The film's portrayal of a beautiful young woman convincing the country to ditch democracy via a book of essays feels more like a caricature than a thoughtful analysis.
In contrast, Alex Garland's 2024 movie Civil War offers a more nuanced exploration of the threat of autocracy in America. Although it too has its limitations, particularly in its lack of detailed explanations, the film manages to tap into something deeper and more unsettling. By reflecting back to us the seriousness of our present situation, Civil War makes a future reign of terror easier to imagine.
This is perhaps why Civil War had a greater impact on me than some of the other movies I watched this week. Despite being a "far inferior" film compared to Paul Thomas Anderson's One Battle After Another, which showcases the brutal military establishment hell-bent on chasing down "illegals", Civil War managed to evoke a sense of unease and discomfort that was hard to shake off.
One Battle After Another is a masterclass in storytelling, with Sean Penn delivering a perfection as Colonel Steven J Lockjaw. However, its ability to reflect back to us the seriousness of our present situation feels more like a commentary on the current state of America rather than a nuanced exploration of the threat of autocracy itself.
Ultimately, the lack of nuance in many Hollywood movies that tackle this issue is a problem that needs addressing. By opting for simplistic explanations and explosive confrontations over detailed explorations of how we arrived at this point, these films fail to capture the complexity and subtlety of the threat of autocracy in America. As such, they risk trivializing the very real concerns that should be at the forefront of our collective consciousness.
As a culture, it's time for us to demand more from our creative industries. We need movies and TV shows that can tackle the complexities of the world we live in with nuance and subtlety. By doing so, they may not always make for blockbuster entertainment, but they will have a far greater impact on shaping our understanding of the world around us.
While Anniversary shows promise in its first half, where Diane Lane plays a centrist mom trying to keep her family and the discourse together, it ultimately falls short by glossing over the finer details of how a subtle shift in language can lead to an Orwellian-style assault on democracy. The film's portrayal of a beautiful young woman convincing the country to ditch democracy via a book of essays feels more like a caricature than a thoughtful analysis.
In contrast, Alex Garland's 2024 movie Civil War offers a more nuanced exploration of the threat of autocracy in America. Although it too has its limitations, particularly in its lack of detailed explanations, the film manages to tap into something deeper and more unsettling. By reflecting back to us the seriousness of our present situation, Civil War makes a future reign of terror easier to imagine.
This is perhaps why Civil War had a greater impact on me than some of the other movies I watched this week. Despite being a "far inferior" film compared to Paul Thomas Anderson's One Battle After Another, which showcases the brutal military establishment hell-bent on chasing down "illegals", Civil War managed to evoke a sense of unease and discomfort that was hard to shake off.
One Battle After Another is a masterclass in storytelling, with Sean Penn delivering a perfection as Colonel Steven J Lockjaw. However, its ability to reflect back to us the seriousness of our present situation feels more like a commentary on the current state of America rather than a nuanced exploration of the threat of autocracy itself.
Ultimately, the lack of nuance in many Hollywood movies that tackle this issue is a problem that needs addressing. By opting for simplistic explanations and explosive confrontations over detailed explorations of how we arrived at this point, these films fail to capture the complexity and subtlety of the threat of autocracy in America. As such, they risk trivializing the very real concerns that should be at the forefront of our collective consciousness.
As a culture, it's time for us to demand more from our creative industries. We need movies and TV shows that can tackle the complexities of the world we live in with nuance and subtlety. By doing so, they may not always make for blockbuster entertainment, but they will have a far greater impact on shaping our understanding of the world around us.